Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jun;44(7):1224-1232. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0369-9. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
Short- and long-term antidepressant effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been demonstrated for several brain targets in open-label studies. For two stimulation targets, pivotal randomized trials have been conducted; both failed a futility analysis. We assessed efficacy and safety of DBS of the supero-lateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (slMFB) in a small Phase I clinical study with a randomized-controlled onset of stimulation in order to obtain data for the planning of a large RCT. Sixteen patients suffering from TRD received DBS of the slMFB and were randomized to sham or real stimulation for the duration of 2 months after implantation. Primary outcome measure was mean reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) during 12 months of DBS (timeline analysis). Secondary outcomes were the difference in several clinical measures between sham and real stimulation at 8 weeks and during stimulation phases. MADRS ratings decreased significantly from 29.6 (SD +/- 4) at baseline to 12.9 (SD +/- 9) during 12 months of DBS (mean MADRS, n = 16). All patients reached the response criterion, most patients (n = 10) responded within a week; 50% of patients were classified as remitters after 1 year of stimulation. The most frequent side effect was transient strabismus. Both groups (active/sham) demonstrated an antidepressant micro-lesioning effect but patients had an additional antidepressant effect after initiation of stimulation. Both rapid onset and stability of the antidepressant effects of slMFB-DBS were demonstrated as in our previous pilot study. Given recent experiences from pivotal trials in DBS for MDD, we believe that slow, careful, and adaptive study development is germane. After our exploratory study and a large-scale study, we conducted this gateway trial in order to better inform planning of the latter. Important aspects for the planning of RCTs in the field of DBS for severe and chronic diseases are discussed including meaningful phases of intra-individual and between-group comparisons and timeline instead of single endpoint analyses.
在开放性研究中,已经证明了针对几种脑目标的深部脑刺激(DBS)在治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)中的短期和长期抗抑郁作用。对于两个刺激靶点,已经进行了关键性随机试验;两者均未通过无效性分析。我们评估了在一项小型 I 期临床研究中,内侧眶额束(slMFB)超外侧分支的 DBS 的疗效和安全性,该研究采用随机对照刺激起始,以便为大型 RCT 的规划提供数据。16 名患有 TRD 的患者接受了 slMFB 的 DBS,并随机分为假刺激和真刺激组,持续 2 个月。主要观察指标是 12 个月 DBS 期间蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)的平均降低量(时间线分析)。次要结局是 8 周和刺激期间假刺激和真刺激之间几种临床指标的差异。MADRS 评分从基线时的 29.6(SD +/- 4)显著降低至 12 个月 DBS 时的 12.9(SD +/- 9)(n = 16)。所有患者均达到了反应标准,大多数患者(n = 10)在一周内即有反应;50%的患者在刺激 1 年后被归类为缓解者。最常见的副作用是短暂斜视。两组(主动/假刺激)均表现出抗抑郁微损伤作用,但在刺激开始后,患者有额外的抗抑郁作用。slMFB-DBS 的快速起效和抗抑郁作用的稳定性均如我们之前的初步研究所示。鉴于最近在 DBS 治疗 MDD 的关键性试验中的经验,我们认为缓慢、谨慎和适应性的研究发展是相关的。在我们的探索性研究和大规模研究之后,我们进行了这个门控试验,以便更好地为后者的规划提供信息。讨论了 DBS 治疗严重和慢性疾病领域 RCT 规划的重要方面,包括个体内和组间比较的有意义阶段以及时间线而不是单一终点分析。