Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Periodontology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 May;46(5):564-571. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13103. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
Few studies have looked at professional assessment or patient perception of aesthetics after root coverage procedures. The addition of connective tissue grafts (CTG) seems to improve aesthetic outcomes. The objective of this a priori analysis was to compare aesthetics after addition of CTG or a collagen matrix (CMX) to coronally advanced flap (CAF).
Two independent, trained and calibrated assessors analysed baseline and 6-month post-operative Images from 183 subjects with 475 recessions from a previously reported multicentre multinational randomized clinical trial. The root coverage aesthetic score (RES) was assessed in its five constituent components after assessing the suitability of images blindly with regard to treatment assignment and centre. Data were analysed at the tooth and subject level.
One hundred and fifty-five subjects (81 CTG) and 393 teeth (207 CTG) were included in the analysis. CTG control subjects had higher total RES scores (mean adjusted difference of 1.3 ± 0.8 RES units, p = 0.002). Analyses of RES subcomponents showed that the CTG group had higher scores in terms of gingival margin position but that better marginal tissue contour (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.7) and soft tissue texture (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.9-5.8) was observed for the CMX group. No significant differences were observed for mucogingival alignment and gingival colour.
Better overall RES scores were observed for the CTG group. Better marginal tissue texture and marginal contour were observed in the CMX group. More research and development is needed to optimize materials to be used in conjunction with CAF to improve root coverage without negatively affecting tissue texture and marginal contour.
很少有研究关注根覆盖术后专业评估或患者对美学的感知。添加结缔组织移植物(CTG)似乎可以改善美学效果。本预先分析的目的是比较 CTG 或胶原基质(CMX)添加到冠向推进瓣(CAF)后美学效果。
两名独立的、经过培训和校准的评估员分析了来自先前报道的多中心、多国随机临床试验的 183 名患者的 475 个退缩部位的基线和术后 6 个月的图像。在不考虑治疗分配和中心的情况下,对图像进行盲法评估后,评估根覆盖美学评分(RES)的五个组成部分。数据分析在牙齿和受试者水平进行。
155 名受试者(81 例 CTG)和 393 颗牙齿(207 例 CTG)纳入分析。CTG 对照组的总 RES 评分较高(平均调整差异为 1.3±0.8 RES 单位,p=0.002)。RES 亚组分分析显示,CTG 组龈缘位置评分较高,但 CMX 组边缘组织轮廓(OR 3.0,95%CI 1.2-7.7)和软组织质地(OR 3.3,95%CI 1.9-5.8)更好。龈乳头黏膜和牙龈颜色无显著差异。
CTG 组的总体 RES 评分较高。CMX 组的边缘组织质地和边缘轮廓更好。需要进一步的研究和开发,以优化与 CAF 联合使用的材料,在不影响组织质地和边缘轮廓的情况下改善根覆盖。