• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联想学习的双误差动态渐近模型。

A double error dynamic asymptote model of associative learning.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, City, University of London.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2019 Jul;126(4):506-549. doi: 10.1037/rev0000147. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1037/rev0000147
PMID:30869968
Abstract

In this article a formal model of associative learning is presented that incorporates representational and computational mechanisms that, as a coherent corpus, empower it to make accurate predictions of a wide variety of phenomena that, so far, have eluded a unified account in learning theory. In particular, the Double Error Dynamic Asymptote (DDA) model introduces: (a) a fully connected network architecture in which stimuli are represented as temporally clustered elements that associate to each other, so that elements of one cluster engender activity on other clusters, which naturally implements neutral stimuli associations and mediated learning; (b) a predictor error term within the traditional error correction rule (the double error), which reduces the rate of learning for expected predictors; (c) a revaluation associability rate that operates on the assumption that the outcome predictiveness is tracked over time so that prolonged uncertainty is learned, reducing the levels of attention to initially surprising outcomes; and critically (d) a biologically plausible variable asymptote, which encapsulates the principle of Hebbian learning, leading to stronger associations for similar levels of cluster activity. The outputs of a set of simulations of the DDA model are presented along with empirical results from the literature. Finally, the predictive scope of the model is discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本文提出了一种形式化的联想学习模型,该模型结合了表示和计算机制,作为一个连贯的整体,使其能够准确预测到各种现象,到目前为止,这些现象在学习理论中还没有得到统一的解释。特别是,双误差动态渐近(DDA)模型引入了:(a)一种全连接的网络架构,其中刺激被表示为时间上聚类的元素,这些元素彼此关联,从而一个聚类的元素会在其他聚类上产生活动,这自然实现了中性刺激的关联和中介学习;(b)在传统的误差修正规则(双误差)中引入了预测误差项,这降低了对预期预测器的学习速度;(c)重新评估可联想性率,其假设是对结果的可预测性进行跟踪,从而学习到长时间的不确定性,降低对最初令人惊讶的结果的注意力水平;以及关键的(d)一个具有生物合理性的可变渐近值,它包含了赫布学习的原理,导致相似水平的聚类活动产生更强的关联。本文展示了 DDA 模型的一系列模拟的输出结果,并结合了文献中的实证结果。最后,讨论了模型的预测范围。(PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
A double error dynamic asymptote model of associative learning.联想学习的双误差动态渐近模型。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jul;126(4):506-549. doi: 10.1037/rev0000147. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Mediated learning: A computational rendering of ketamine-induced symptoms.中介学习:氯胺酮诱导症状的计算呈现。
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Jun;138(3):178-194. doi: 10.1037/bne0000591. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect.结果处理中的习得性偏差:结果可预测性效应的简要综述。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/xan0000195.
4
Learned predictiveness models predict opposite attention biases in the inverse base-rate effect.习得性预测模型预测了逆基础比率效应中的相反注意偏差。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Apr;45(2):143-162. doi: 10.1037/xan0000196. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.联想历史在联想学习模型中的作用:选择性综述与混合模型
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2004 Jul;57(3):193-243. doi: 10.1080/02724990344000141.
6
The representation of stimulus conjunction in theories of associative learning: A context-dependent added-elements model.联想学习理论中刺激联合的表示:一种上下文相关的附加元素模型。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(3):185-204. doi: 10.1037/xan0000252.
7
Theory protection: Do humans protect existing associative links?理论保护:人类是否保护现有的联想联系?
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Jan;48(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/xan0000314.
8
A configural theory of attention and associative learning.一种关于注意力和联想学习的构型理论。
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):241-54. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0078-2.
9
Attentional and error-correcting associative mechanisms in classical conditioning.经典条件作用中的注意和错误纠正关联机制。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):407-18. doi: 10.1037/a0014737.
10
Associative change in Pavlovian conditioning: A reappraisal.条件反射关联变化:再评价。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2022 Oct;48(4):281-294. doi: 10.1037/xan0000318. Epub 2022 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequences and animal intelligence.序列与动物智力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240116. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0116.
2
Measuring Human Pavlovian Reward Conditioning and Memory Retention After Consolidation.测量人类巩固后的巴甫洛夫式奖励条件反射和记忆保持
Psychophysiology. 2025 Apr;62(4):e70058. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70058.
3
A test of memory for stimulus sequences in great apes.猿类刺激序列记忆测试。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 6;18(9):e0290546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290546. eCollection 2023.
4
Models of Dynamic Belief Updating in Psychosis-A Review Across Different Computational Approaches.精神病中动态信念更新模型——不同计算方法综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 12;13:814111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.814111. eCollection 2022.