Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Pulmonology Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Patient's satisfaction level is considered an indicator that interferes with interventions effectiveness. There is evidence from other health professionals that patients with higher satisfaction level recover faster. However, benefits toward physical therapy intervention is poorly known.
To measure the inpatient satisfaction level receiving physical therapy care and to evaluate which aspects of these treatments are flawed.
Patients admitted to hospital were evaluated using MedRisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Physical Therapy Care (MRPS) that scores from 1 to 5 (higher values indicate higher satisfaction) for each item. Patients clinical and demographic characteristics and the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) were also collected. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted.
200 patients were evaluated (50.9±18.81 years, 58% male). Most of MRPS items were above 4. The highest scoring item (4.75) was physical therapist's respect to the patient. The lowest scoring item (1.82) was in relation to physical therapy guidelines at hospital discharge. Mean MRPS total score and GPE were 46.09±4.93 and 2.18±1.18, respectively.
The majority of patients are satisfied and showed improvement after physical therapy treatment. There is the need for advances and intervention in relation to physical therapy guidelines at hospital discharge. MRPS instrument proved to be appropriate to measure inpatient's satisfaction level with physical therapy care.
患者满意度被认为是干预措施效果的一个指标。其他健康专业人员的证据表明,满意度较高的患者康复得更快。然而,物理治疗干预的益处尚不清楚。
测量接受物理治疗护理的住院患者的满意度,并评估这些治疗的哪些方面存在缺陷。
使用 MedRisk 仪器测量物理治疗护理患者满意度(MRPS)对每位患者进行评估,该仪器的评分范围为 1 到 5(分数越高表示满意度越高)。还收集了患者的临床和人口统计学特征以及总体感知效果(GPE)。进行了探索性因素分析。
评估了 200 名患者(50.9±18.81 岁,58%为男性)。大多数 MRPS 项目的得分都在 4 分以上。得分最高的项目(4.75)是物理治疗师对患者的尊重。得分最低的项目(1.82)是与出院时的物理治疗指南有关。MRPS 总分和 GPE 的平均值分别为 46.09±4.93 和 2.18±1.18。
大多数患者对物理治疗治疗后感到满意并有所改善。在出院时的物理治疗指南方面需要进一步改进和干预。MRPS 工具被证明适合测量住院患者对物理治疗护理的满意度。