• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对不同频率复音的频率跟随反应反映了不同的声源配置。

Frequency-Following Responses to Complex Tones at Different Frequencies Reflect Different Source Configurations.

作者信息

Zhang Xiaochen, Gong Qin

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Research Center of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 26;13:130. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00130. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2019.00130
PMID:30872990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6402474/
Abstract

The neural generators of the frequency-following response (FFR), a neural response widely used to study the human auditory system, remain unclear. There is evidence that the balance between cortical and subcortical contributions to the FFR varies with stimulus frequency. In this study, we tried to clarify whether this variation extended to subcortical nuclei at higher stimulus frequencies where cortical sources were inactive. We evoked FFRs, in 17 human listeners with normal hearing (9 female), with three complex tones with missing-fundamentals corresponding to musical tones C4 (262 Hz), E4 (330 Hz), and G4 (393 Hz) presented to left, right, or both ears. Source imaging results confirmed the dominance of subcortical activity underlying both fundamental frequency (F0) and second harmonic (H2) components of the FFR. Importantly, several FFR features (spatial complexity, scalp distributions of spectral strength and inter-trial phase coherence, and functional connectivity patterns) varied systematically with stimulus F0, suggesting an unfixed source configuration. We speculated that the variation of FFR source configuration with stimulus frequency resulted from changing relative contributions of subcortical nuclei. Supportively, topographic comparison between the FFR and the auditory brainstem response (ABR) evoked by clicks revealed that the topography of the F0 component resembled that of the click-ABR at an earlier latency when stimulus F0 was higher and that the topography of the H2 component resembled that of the click-ABR at a nearly fixed latency regardless of stimulus F0, particularly for binaurally evoked FFRs. Possible generation sites of the FFR and implications for future studies were discussed.

摘要

频率跟随反应(FFR)是一种广泛用于研究人类听觉系统的神经反应,其神经发生器尚不清楚。有证据表明,皮质和皮质下对FFR的贡献之间的平衡随刺激频率而变化。在本研究中,我们试图阐明这种变化是否扩展到更高刺激频率下皮质源不活跃时的皮质下核。我们对17名听力正常的人类受试者(9名女性)进行测试,向其左耳、右耳或双耳呈现三种对应于音乐音调C4(262 Hz)、E4(330 Hz)和G4(393 Hz)的缺基复音来诱发FFR。源成像结果证实了FFR的基频(F0)和二次谐波(H2)成分背后皮质下活动的主导地位。重要的是,几个FFR特征(空间复杂性、频谱强度的头皮分布和试验间相位相干性以及功能连接模式)随刺激F0系统地变化,表明源配置不固定。我们推测FFR源配置随刺激频率的变化是由皮质下核相对贡献的变化引起的。支持这一推测的是,FFR与点击诱发的听觉脑干反应(ABR)之间的地形比较表明,当刺激F0较高时,F0成分的地形在较早潜伏期类似于点击ABR的地形,而H2成分的地形在几乎固定的潜伏期类似于点击ABR的地形,与刺激F0无关,特别是对于双耳诱发的FFR。文中讨论了FFR可能的产生部位以及对未来研究的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/478704380e70/fnins-13-00130-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/79e1c9d40d77/fnins-13-00130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/fc97db6feb34/fnins-13-00130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/2e47dbd43a7d/fnins-13-00130-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/e2f0024e8ffe/fnins-13-00130-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/1f1d48b562d8/fnins-13-00130-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/98c2abda8a06/fnins-13-00130-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/478704380e70/fnins-13-00130-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/79e1c9d40d77/fnins-13-00130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/fc97db6feb34/fnins-13-00130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/2e47dbd43a7d/fnins-13-00130-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/e2f0024e8ffe/fnins-13-00130-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/1f1d48b562d8/fnins-13-00130-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/98c2abda8a06/fnins-13-00130-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181d/6402474/478704380e70/fnins-13-00130-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency-Following Responses to Complex Tones at Different Frequencies Reflect Different Source Configurations.对不同频率复音的频率跟随反应反映了不同的声源配置。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 26;13:130. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00130. eCollection 2019.
2
Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.下皮质而非皮质来源的频率跟随反应(FFR)与正常听力者的噪声中言语感知有关。
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Feb 16;746:135664. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135664. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
3
Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.人类对滤波语音的频率跟随反应。
Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):87-105. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000902.
4
Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.皮层下来源主导言语神经电听觉频率跟随反应。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:56-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.060. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.频率跟随反应中的频率依赖性精细结构:多个发生器的副产物。
Hear Res. 2017 May;348:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
6
Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.人类脑干频率跟随反应的多通道记录:头皮地形图、源发生器以及与瞬态听觉脑干反应的区别
Hear Res. 2015 May;323:68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.人类对语音编码语音的频率跟随反应。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):e256-e267. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000432.
8
Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.言语的刺激率与皮层下听觉处理
Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(5):332-42. doi: 10.1159/000289572. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
9
Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products.双耳分听对频率跟随反应的相位影响揭示了相位可变和不变的谐波失真产物。
Hear Res. 2019 Sep 1;380:84-99. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
10
Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.人类对语音和非语音声音的频率跟随反应(FFR)的响应特性:强度依赖性、适应性和锁相极限。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(9):665-672. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1470338. Epub 2018 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Myogenic artifacts masquerade as neuroplasticity in the auditory frequency-following response.肌源性伪迹在听觉频率跟随反应中伪装成神经可塑性。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jul 8;18:1422903. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1422903. eCollection 2024.
2
Neural encoding of voice pitch and formant structure at birth as revealed by frequency-following responses.出生时通过频率跟随反应揭示的语音音高和共振峰结构的神经编码。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 23;11(1):6660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85799-x.
3
Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

本文引用的文献

1
Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.皮层下来源主导言语神经电听觉频率跟随反应。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:56-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.060. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
2
Attentional Modulation of Envelope-Following Responses at Lower (93-109 Hz) but Not Higher (217-233 Hz) Modulation Rates.在较低(93 - 109赫兹)而非较高(217 - 233赫兹)调制率下,包络跟随反应的注意力调制。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;19(1):83-97. doi: 10.1007/s10162-017-0641-9. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
3
Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging.
下皮质而非皮质来源的频率跟随反应(FFR)与正常听力者的噪声中言语感知有关。
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Feb 16;746:135664. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135664. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
What Can Computational Models Learn From Human Selective Attention? A Review From an Audiovisual Unimodal and Crossmodal Perspective.计算模型能从人类选择性注意中学到什么?从视听单峰和跨峰视角的综述。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2020 Feb 27;14:10. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00010. eCollection 2020.
5
Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.对频率跟随反应源的不断发展的观点。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 6;10(1):5036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13003-w.
脑电生理学和成像的脑磁图。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Feb 23;20(3):327-339. doi: 10.1038/nn.4504.
4
Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.频率跟随反应中的频率依赖性精细结构:多个发生器的副产物。
Hear Res. 2017 May;348:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
5
Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.听觉频率跟随与起始反应的皮质相关性:脑电图和功能磁共振成像证据
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):830-838. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1265-16.2016.
6
Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.频率辨别阈与基于正常听力受试者频率跟随反应主成分分析指标之间的相关性。
Hear Res. 2017 Feb;344:255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
7
Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG.脑磁图揭示的皮质对听觉频率跟随反应的贡献
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 24;7:11070. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11070.
8
Differential Group Delay of the Frequency Following Response Measured Vertically and Horizontally.垂直和水平测量的频率跟随响应的差分群延迟。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016 Apr;17(2):133-43. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0556-x. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.人类脑干频率跟随反应的多通道记录:头皮地形图、源发生器以及与瞬态听觉脑干反应的区别
Hear Res. 2015 May;323:68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
10
Principal components of functional connectivity: a new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest.功能连接的主要成分:一种研究静息状态下大脑动态连接的新方法。
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:937-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Jul 18.