Suppr超能文献

急诊科干预老年人:系统评价。

Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1516-1525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of emergency department (ED) interventions on clinical, utilization, and care experience outcomes for older adults.

DESIGN

A conceptual model informed, protocol-based systematic review.

SETTING

Emergency Department (ED).

PARTICIPANTS

Older adults 65 years of age and older.

METHODS AND MEASUREMENT

Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for English-language studies published through December 2017. Studies evaluating the use of one or more eligible intervention strategies (discharge planning, case management, medication safety or management, and geriatric EDs including those that cited the 2014 Geriatric ED Guidelines) with adults 65 years of age and older were included. Studies were classified by the number of intervention strategies used (ie, single strategy or multi-strategy) and key intervention components present (ie, assessment, referral plus follow-up, and contact both before and after ED discharge ["bridge"]). The effect of ED interventions on clinical (functional status, quality of life [QOL]), patient experience, and utilization (hospitalization, ED return visit) outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 2000 citations were identified; 17 articles describing 15 unique studies (9 randomized and 6 nonrandomized) met eligibility criteria and were included in analyses. ED interventions showed a mixed pattern of effects. Overall, there was a small positive effect of ED interventions on functional status but no effects on QOL, patient experience, hospitalization at or after the initial ED index visit, or ED return visit.

CONCLUSION

Studies using two or more intervention strategies may be associated with the greatest effects on clinical and utilization outcomes. More comprehensive interventions, defined as those with all three key intervention components present, may be associated with some positive outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估急诊科干预对老年人临床、利用和护理体验结果的影响。

设计

概念模型指导、基于方案的系统评价。

地点

急诊科。

参与者

年龄在 65 岁及以上的老年人。

方法和测量

通过 Medline、Embase、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 搜索截至 2017 年 12 月发表的英文研究。纳入评估使用一种或多种合格干预策略(出院计划、病例管理、药物安全或管理、以及包括引用 2014 年老年急诊科指南的老年急诊科)的成年人 65 岁及以上的研究。研究按使用的干预策略数量进行分类(即单一策略或多策略)和存在的关键干预组成部分(即评估、转介加随访以及在急诊科出院前后的联系[桥梁])。评估急诊科干预对临床(功能状态、生活质量[QOL])、患者体验和利用(住院、急诊科复诊)结果的影响。

结果

共确定了 2000 条引用;17 篇描述了 15 项独特研究(9 项随机对照和 6 项非随机对照)符合纳入标准并纳入分析。急诊科干预的效果呈现出混合模式。总体而言,急诊科干预对功能状态有较小的积极影响,但对生活质量、患者体验、初始急诊科指数就诊时或之后的住院或急诊科复诊没有影响。

结论

使用两种或更多干预策略的研究可能与临床和利用结果的最大影响相关。更全面的干预措施,即具有所有三个关键干预组成部分的干预措施,可能与一些积极的结果相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb11/6677239/b30442317f57/nihms-1026504-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergency Department Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.急诊科干预老年人:系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1516-1525. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15854. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Tracking the Rise of Geriatric Emergency Departments in the United States.追踪美国老年急诊部的兴起。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Aug;39(8):871-879. doi: 10.1177/0733464818813030. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
7
A Conceptual Model for Episodes of Acute, Unscheduled Care.急性非计划护理事件的概念模型。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;68(4):484-491.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验