Suppr超能文献

从用户角度评估中国基层医疗服务绩效:调查工具及实施问题综述。

Evaluating Primary Health Care Performance from User Perspective in China: Review of Survey Instruments and Implementation Issues.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1M5, Canada.

China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 14;16(6):926. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060926.

Abstract

This review aims to summarize the progress of patient evaluation studies focusing on primary health care (PHC) in China, specifically in relation to survey instruments and implementation issues. Eligible studies published in English or Chinese were obtained through online searches of PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. A descriptive reporting approach was used due to variations in the measurements and administration methods between studies. A total of 471 articles were identified and of these articles; of those 91 full-text articles were included in the final analysis. Most studies used author-developed measurements with five-point Likert response scales and many used the Chinese translations of validated tools from other countries. Most instruments assessed the physical environment, medical equipment, clinical competency and convenience aspects of PHC using a satisfaction rating instead of care experience reporting. Many studies did not report the sampling approach, patient recruitment procedures and survey administration modes. The patient exit survey was the most commonly used survey implementation method. The focus on the structural dimensions of PHC, inconsistent wording, categories of response options that use satisfaction rating, and unclear survey implementation processes are common problems in patient evaluation studies of PHC in China. Further studies are necessary to identify population preferences of PHC in China in order to move towards developing Chinese value-based patient experience measurements.

摘要

本文旨在总结中国基层医疗保健(PHC)患者评估研究的进展,特别是在调查工具和实施问题方面。通过在 PubMed 和中国国家知识基础设施上在线搜索,获得了符合条件的英文和中文发表的研究。由于研究之间的测量和管理方法存在差异,因此采用描述性报告方法。共确定了 471 篇文章,其中 91 篇全文文章被纳入最终分析。大多数研究使用作者开发的测量工具,采用五点李克特反应量表,许多研究使用来自其他国家的经过验证的工具的中文翻译。大多数工具使用满意度评分来评估 PHC 的物理环境、医疗设备、临床能力和便利性方面,而不是报告护理体验。许多研究没有报告抽样方法、患者招募程序和调查管理模式。患者退出调查是最常用的调查实施方法。在中国的 PHC 患者评估研究中,常见的问题包括关注 PHC 的结构维度、措辞不一致、使用满意度评分的应答选项类别以及不明确的调查实施过程。有必要进一步研究以确定中国 PHC 的人群偏好,从而朝着开发基于中国价值观的患者体验测量方法的方向发展。

相似文献

10

引用本文的文献

3
Patient satisfaction impact indicators from a psychosocial perspective.从社会心理角度看患者满意度的影响因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;11:1103819. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1103819. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.改进叙述性文献综述的同行评审。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Sep 4;1:12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0019-2. eCollection 2016.
4
The primary health-care system in China.中国的基层医疗保健系统。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2584-2594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验