From the Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
M. Gløersen, Medical Student, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital; P. Steen Pettersen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital; T.K. Kvien, MD, PhD, Professor of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital; I.K. Haugen, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital.
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jun;46(6):645-651. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180835. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
To examine the validity of a modified Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire for assessment of pain in hand osteoarthritis (OA).
The modified ICOAP-hand questionnaire was administered to 300 patients [89% female, median (interquartile range) age: 61 (57-66) yrs] in the Nor-Hand observational cohort study. The questionnaire was completed twice by 31 patients and test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for sum scores and weighted κ scores for individual items. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlations. Correlations between the ICOAP-hand questionnaire, the Australian/Canadian Hand OA Index (AUSCAN) hand pain subscale, and pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS) were analyzed using Spearman correlation analyses.
We found a substantial overlap between constant and intermittent pain (46% reporting constant + intermittent pain and 33% reporting no pain). Test-retest reliability analysis of ICOAP-hand showed an ICC of 0.89 for the total scale and weighted κ values between 0.39-0.70 for the individual items. Principal component analysis revealed one component with an eigenvalue of 7.9, explaining 72% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient values > 0.93 and strong item-total correlations proved high internal consistency. ICOAP-hand was strongly correlated with NRS hand pain and the AUSCAN pain subscale.
ICOAP-hand is a reliable pain index that correlates with other available pain questionnaires. However, our results indicate that constant and intermittent pain do not represent separate constructs in hand OA, questioning the usefulness of the 2 subscales. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03083548].
检验改良的间歇性和持续性骨关节炎疼痛(ICOAP)问卷对手部骨关节炎(OA)疼痛评估的有效性。
在 Nor-Hand 观察性队列研究中,对 300 名患者(89%为女性,中位数[四分位间距]年龄:61[57-66]岁)进行改良 ICOAP 手部问卷评估。31 名患者两次完成问卷,采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估总分和各条目加权κ值评估测试-重测信度。采用克朗巴赫 α系数和条目-总分相关评估内部一致性。采用 Spearman 相关分析评估 ICOAP 手部问卷与澳大利亚/加拿大手部 OA 指数(AUSCAN)手部疼痛子量表和数字评分量表(NRS)之间的相关性。
我们发现持续性疼痛和间歇性疼痛之间存在显著重叠(46%报告持续性+间歇性疼痛,33%报告无疼痛)。ICOAP 手部测试-重测信度分析显示,总评分的 ICC 为 0.89,各条目加权κ值为 0.39-0.70。主成分分析显示一个特征值为 7.9 的分量,解释了总方差的 72%。克朗巴赫 α系数值>0.93,条目-总分相关性强,表明内部一致性高。ICOAP 手部与 NRS 手部疼痛和 AUSCAN 疼痛子量表高度相关。
ICOAP 手部是一种可靠的疼痛指数,与其他可用的疼痛问卷相关。然而,我们的结果表明,持续性疼痛和间歇性疼痛在手 OA 中并不代表独立的结构,这质疑了这两个子量表的有用性。[临床试验.gov:NCT03083548]。