• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does family communication matter? Exploring knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families.家庭沟通重要吗?探索癌症家族中乳腺癌遗传学知识。
J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):481-487. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00413-y. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
2
Genetic Literacy and Communication of Genetic Information in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Study Comparison in Two Countries and within a Timeframe of More Than 10 Years.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌相关家庭中的基因知识素养与基因信息交流:两个国家超过10年时间框架内的跨研究比较
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 13;13(24):6254. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246254.
3
BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌家族中的BRCA1检测。一项关于患者决策及结果的前瞻性研究。
JAMA. 1996 Jun 26;275(24):1885-92.
4
Cancer Predisposition Cascade Screening for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndromes in Switzerland: Study Protocol.瑞士遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌和林奇综合征的癌症易感性级联筛查:研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Sep 20;6(9):e184. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8138.
5
Informing models of cancer genetics care in the era of multigene panel testing with patient-led recommendations.在多基因检测时代,根据患者主导的建议为癌症遗传学护理模型提供信息。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):268-282. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1317. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Female family members lack understanding of indeterminate negative BRCA1/2 test results shared by probands.女性家庭成员对先证者所分享的BRCA1/2基因检测结果不确定为阴性缺乏理解。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Oct;28(5):950-961. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1147. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
8
Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC): patient experiences using the Cancer Risk Education Intervention Tool (CREdIT).针对有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)风险的低文化水平女性的咨询前教育:患者使用癌症风险教育干预工具(CREdIT)的体验。
J Genet Couns. 2010 Oct;19(5):447-62. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9303-3. Epub 2010 May 19.
9
The Effect of Telephone Counseling and Education on Breast Cancer Screening in Family Caregivers of Breast Cancer Patients.电话咨询与教育对乳腺癌患者家庭照顾者乳腺癌筛查的影响
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2017 Oct;5(4):306-316.
10
Black and Minority Ethnic women's decision-making for risk reduction strategies after BRCA testing: Use of context and knowledge.黑人及少数族裔女性在BRCA检测后制定降低风险策略的决策:背景和知识的运用。
Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective changes in primary care patients' family communication after skin cancer genetic test offer.皮肤癌基因检测提供后,初级保健患者家庭沟通的前瞻性变化。
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 7;7:100409. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100409. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM).支持患者将遗传检测结果与高危亲属分享的干预措施:无荟萃分析的综合研究(SWiM)。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Sep;31(9):988-1002. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01400-1. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
3
Definitions and measurement of health literacy in health and medicine research: a systematic review.健康和医学研究中健康素养的定义和测量:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):e056294. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056294.
4
Genetic Literacy and Communication of Genetic Information in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Study Comparison in Two Countries and within a Timeframe of More Than 10 Years.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌相关家庭中的基因知识素养与基因信息交流:两个国家超过10年时间框架内的跨研究比较
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 13;13(24):6254. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246254.
5
Information needs on breast cancer genetic and non-genetic risk factors in relatives of women with a BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variant.关于携带 BRCA1/2 或 PALB2 致病性变异的女性亲属的乳腺癌遗传和非遗传风险因素的信息需求。
Breast. 2021 Dec;60:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: patient recommendations for improved risk communication.遗传性癌症综合征的基因检测:患者对改善风险沟通的建议。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):884-892. doi: 10.1111/hex.13062. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach.一种简化算术量表的开发与测试:拉施分析方法
J Behav Decis Mak. 2013 Apr;26(2):198-212. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1751. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
2
Assessment of Current Genetic Counselor Practices in Post-Visit Written Communications to Patients.对当前遗传咨询师在随访后给患者的书面沟通中的实践评估。
J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun;27(3):681-688. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0163-y. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions among Relatives of Women with Uninformative Negative BRCA1/2 Test Results: The Moderating Effect of the Amount of Shared Information.BRCA1/2检测结果为无信息价值阴性的女性亲属对乳腺癌风险的认知:共享信息量的调节作用
J Genet Couns. 2016 Apr;25(2):258-69. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9866-0. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
Is patients' numeracy related to physical and mental health?患者的数字能力与身心健康有关吗?
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):501-11. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15578126.
5
Can risk and illness perceptions predict breast cancer worry in healthy women?风险和疾病认知能否预测健康女性对乳腺癌的担忧?
J Health Psychol. 2016 Sep;21(9):2052-62. doi: 10.1177/1359105315570984. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey.接受和分享高穿透性癌症基因检测结果的患病率及其相关因素:来自健康信息国家趋势调查的结果
Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(2):67-77. doi: 10.1159/000368745.
7
Disparities in uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a randomized trial of telephone counseling.电话咨询随机试验中BRCA1/2基因检测接受情况的差异
Genet Med. 2015 Jun;17(6):467-75. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.125. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
8
Linking genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes in individuals at elevated breast cancer risk.将遗传咨询内容与乳腺癌高风险个体的短期结果相联系。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Oct;23(5):838-48. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9705-8. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
9
Young adult daughters of BRCA1/2 positive mothers: what do they know about hereditary cancer and how much do they worry?BRCA1/2 阳性母亲的成年女儿:她们对遗传性癌症了解多少,又有多担心?
Psychooncology. 2013 Sep;22(9):2024-31. doi: 10.1002/pon.3257. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
10
Public knowledge of and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing.公众对遗传学和基因检测的了解及态度。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013 Apr;17(4):327-35. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0350. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

家庭沟通重要吗?探索癌症家族中乳腺癌遗传学知识。

Does family communication matter? Exploring knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families.

作者信息

Himes Deborah O, Davis Sarah H, Lassetter Jane H, Peterson Neil E, Clayton Margaret F, Birmingham Wendy C, Kinney Anita Y

机构信息

College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 500 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, UT, USA.

College of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2019 Oct;10(4):481-487. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00413-y. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-019-00413-y
PMID:30877488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6754477/
Abstract

Knowledge of breast cancer genetics is critical for those at increased hereditary risk who must make decisions about breast cancer screening options. This descriptive study explored theory-based relationships among cognitive and emotional variables related to knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families. Participants included first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer who had received genetic counseling and testing. Study participants themselves did not have breast cancer and had not received genetic counseling or testing. Data were collected by telephone interviews and surveys. Variables analyzed included numeracy, health literacy, cancer-related distress, age, education, and the reported amount of information shared by the participants' family members about genetic counseling. The multiple regression model explained 13.9% of variance in knowledge of breast cancer genetics (p = 0.03). Best fit of the multiple regression model included all variables except education. Reported amount of information shared was the only independently significant factor associated with knowledge (β = 0.28, p = 0.01). Participants who reported higher levels of information shared by a family member about information learned during a genetic counseling session also demonstrated increased knowledge about breast cancer genetics.

摘要

对于那些具有较高遗传风险、必须就乳腺癌筛查选项做出决策的人来说,了解乳腺癌遗传学至关重要。这项描述性研究探讨了癌症家族中与乳腺癌遗传学知识相关的认知和情感变量之间基于理论的关系。参与者包括接受过遗传咨询和检测的乳腺癌女性的一级亲属。研究参与者本人没有患乳腺癌,也没有接受过遗传咨询或检测。数据通过电话访谈和调查收集。分析的变量包括算术能力、健康素养、癌症相关困扰、年龄、教育程度,以及参与者家庭成员报告的关于遗传咨询的信息共享量。多元回归模型解释了乳腺癌遗传学知识中13.9%的方差变异(p = 0.03)。多元回归模型的最佳拟合包括除教育程度之外的所有变量。报告的信息共享量是与知识相关的唯一独立显著因素(β = 0.28,p = 0.01)。那些报告家庭成员分享了更多关于在遗传咨询过程中学到的信息的参与者,对乳腺癌遗传学的了解也更多。