• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自下而上的方法有利于促进城市景观中的社会-生态适应性吗?

Are bottom-up approaches good for promoting social-ecological fit in urban landscapes?

机构信息

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, African Climate and Development Institute, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.

出版信息

Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):49-61. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01163-4. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-019-01163-4
PMID:30879271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6888795/
Abstract

Bottom-up approaches are often presented as a remedy to environmental governance problems caused by poorly aligned social institutions and fragmented ecosystems. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence demonstrating how such social-ecological fit might emerge and help achieve desirable outcomes. This paper combines quantitative social-ecological network analysis with interviews to investigate whether bottom-up approaches in lake governance improve the fit. We study groups of residents seeking to improve management of a network of lakes in Bengaluru, India. Results show that 23 'lake groups' collaborate in a way that aligns with how lakes are hydrologically connected, thus strengthening the social-ecological fit. Three groups founded around 2010 have mobilized support from municipal officers and introduced an ecosystem-based approach to lake management that recognizes their ecological functions and dependence on, the broader hydrological network. These groups have also changed how other lake groups operate: groups founded after 2010 are more collaborative and more prone to contribute to social-ecological fit compared to the older lake groups. This paper demonstrates the utility of a theoretically informed method for examining the impact of bottom-up approaches, which, we argue, is important for a more informed perspective on their relevance and potential contribution to urban environmental governance.

摘要

自下而上的方法常被视为解决社会制度不匹配和生态系统碎片化导致的环境治理问题的一种补救措施。然而,缺乏实证证据表明这种社会-生态契合如何出现并有助于实现理想的结果。本文将定量的社会-生态网络分析与访谈相结合,以调查湖泊治理中的自下而上方法是否能提高契合度。我们研究了一群试图改善印度班加罗尔一个湖泊网络管理的居民。结果表明,23 个“湖泊小组”以与湖泊水力连接相一致的方式进行合作,从而加强了社会-生态契合。大约 2010 年成立的三个小组动员了市政官员的支持,并引入了一种基于生态系统的湖泊管理方法,承认了湖泊的生态功能及其对更广泛的水文网络的依赖。这些小组还改变了其他湖泊小组的运作方式:2010 年后成立的小组比老的湖泊小组更具协作性,也更倾向于促进社会-生态契合。本文展示了一种理论上有依据的方法在检验自下而上方法的影响方面的效用,我们认为,这对于更深入了解其对城市环境治理的相关性和潜在贡献具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/d4f6549bf276/13280_2019_1163_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/50ade1377575/13280_2019_1163_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/61ceb481d6db/13280_2019_1163_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/7aa6eefde5fd/13280_2019_1163_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/d4f6549bf276/13280_2019_1163_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/50ade1377575/13280_2019_1163_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/61ceb481d6db/13280_2019_1163_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/7aa6eefde5fd/13280_2019_1163_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0d/6888795/d4f6549bf276/13280_2019_1163_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Are bottom-up approaches good for promoting social-ecological fit in urban landscapes?自下而上的方法有利于促进城市景观中的社会-生态适应性吗?
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):49-61. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01163-4. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
2
Social-ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration.河口流域恢复中尺度不匹配的社会生态网络分析
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 7;114(10):E1776-E1785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604405114. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
3
Freshwater lake ecosystem shift caused by social-economic transitions in Yangtze River Basin over the past century.过去一个世纪,长江流域社会经济转型导致淡水湖泊生态系统变化。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 21;8(1):17146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35482-5.
4
Biological invasions, ecological resilience and adaptive governance.生物入侵、生态恢复力与适应性治理
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183(Pt 2):399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.040. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
5
Conservation success as a function of good alignment of social and ecological structures and processes.保护成功是社会与生态结构及过程良好契合的函数。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Oct;28(5):1371-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12306. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
6
The importance of transient social dynamics for restoring ecosystems beyond ecological tipping points.瞬态社会动态对于超越生态临界点恢复生态系统的重要性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2717-2722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817154117. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Relational place-based solutions for environmental policy misalignments.基于关系的场所解决方案,以解决环境政策的不匹配问题。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar;39(3):217-220. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Ecological resilience in lakes and the conjunction fallacy.湖泊生态弹性与会合谬误。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov;1(11):1616-1624. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0333-1. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
Social-ecological assessment of Lake Manyara basin, Tanzania: A mixed method approach.坦桑尼亚马尼亚拉湖流域的社会-生态评估:混合方法研究
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 1;267:110594. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110594. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Novel ecosystems: Governance and conservation in the age of the Anthropocene.新型生态系统:人类世时代的治理与保护
J Environ Manage. 2018 Feb 15;208:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban sustainability science: prospects for innovations through a system's perspective, relational and transformations' approaches : This article belongs to Ambio's 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Urbanization.城市可持续性科学:通过系统观点、关系方法和转型方法进行创新的前景:本文属于《AMBIO》50 周年专刊。主题:城市化。
Ambio. 2021 Sep;50(9):1650-1658. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01521-1. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
A social-ecological framework and toolbox to help strengthening functional agrobiodiversity-supported ecosystem services at the landscape scale.一个社会-生态框架和工具包,旨在帮助加强景观尺度上功能性农业生物多样性支持的生态系统服务。
Ambio. 2021 Feb;50(2):360-374. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01382-0. Epub 2020 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Social-ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration.河口流域恢复中尺度不匹配的社会生态网络分析
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 7;114(10):E1776-E1785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604405114. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
2
Who collaborates and why: Assessment and diagnostic of governance network integration for salmon restoration in Puget Sound, USA.谁进行合作以及为何合作:美国普吉特海湾鲑鱼恢复治理网络整合的评估与诊断
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jan 15;186(Pt 1):64-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.085. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Greed, Scale Mismatch, and Learning.
贪婪、规模不匹配与学习
Ecol Appl. 1993 Nov;3(4):560-564. doi: 10.2307/1942079.
4
Scientists must have a say in the future of cities.科学家必须在城市的未来发展中拥有发言权。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):165-166. doi: 10.1038/538165a.
5
Closing the collaborative gap: Aligning social and ecological connectivity for better management of interconnected wetlands.弥合协作差距:协调社会与生态连通性以更好地管理相互关联的湿地。
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S138-48. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0605-9.
6
Conservation success as a function of good alignment of social and ecological structures and processes.保护成功是社会与生态结构及过程良好契合的函数。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Oct;28(5):1371-9. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12306. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion.全球城市土地扩张的元分析。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023777. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
8
Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability.城市发展、气候变化和淡水资源供应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 12;108(15):6312-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011615108. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
9
Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: the Agara lake in Bangalore, India.城市化导致的公共用地变化:印度班加罗尔的阿格拉湖。
Environ Manage. 2011 May;47(5):840-50. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9658-8. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
10
Global change and the ecology of cities.全球变化与城市生态学
Science. 2008 Feb 8;319(5864):756-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1150195.