Suppr超能文献

有无残疾的产妇行初次剖宫产的医学指征。

Medical indications for primary cesarean delivery in women with and without disabilities.

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(20):3391-3398. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1572740. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

Abstract

Prior research has found that women with disabilities are more likely to deliver by cesarean than are women without disabilities. It is not clear whether all of the cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities are medically necessary. To examine the associations between maternal disability status and type, mode of delivery, and medical indications for cesarean delivery in California deliveries. Retrospective cohort study of all nulliparous births in California between 2000 and 2012. We classified births as to whether or not women underwent a trial of labor and determined if medical indications for cesarean delivery were present. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the association of disability with trial of labor and indications for cesarean delivery. Women with disabilities had lower odds of having a labored delivery, compared to women without disabilities (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.49). In the sample of women who labored (90.5% of total), women with disabilities were more likely to have a medical indication for cesarean delivery (aOR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.21) and were more likely to have a cesarean delivery (aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.38-1.54). In the subsample of unlabored cesarean deliveries, women with disabilities were less likely to have documented medical indications for cesarean delivery (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.41-0.50). Women with disabilities were less likely to labor, and these unlabored cesarean deliveries were less likely to have a medical indication for cesarean, compared to women without disabilities.

摘要

先前的研究发现,残疾女性比非残疾女性更有可能通过剖腹产分娩。目前尚不清楚残疾女性所有的剖腹产是否都有医学必要性。本研究旨在探讨加利福尼亚州分娩中产妇残疾状况与分娩方式和剖腹产医学指征之间的关系。这是一项对 2000 年至 2012 年间加利福尼亚州所有初产妇的回顾性队列研究。我们将分娩分为是否经历了试产,并确定是否存在剖腹产的医学指征。多变量逻辑回归模型分析了残疾与试产和剖腹产指征之间的关联。与非残疾女性相比,残疾女性进行试产的可能性较低(校正优势比[aOR] = 0.45,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.41-0.49)。在进行试产的女性样本中(占总样本的 90.5%),残疾女性更有可能存在剖腹产的医学指征(aOR = 1.15,95%CI 为 1.10-1.21),且更有可能行剖腹产(aOR = 1.46,95%CI 为 1.38-1.54)。在未试产的剖腹产样本中,残疾女性更有可能没有记录剖腹产的医学指征(aOR = 0.45,95%CI 为 0.41-0.50)。与非残疾女性相比,残疾女性进行试产的可能性较低,且这些未试产的剖腹产更不可能存在剖腹产的医学指征。

相似文献

1
Medical indications for primary cesarean delivery in women with and without disabilities.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(20):3391-3398. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1572740. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities.
Disabil Health J. 2017 Jul;10(3):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Prolonged postpartum length of hospital stay among women with disabilities.
Disabil Health J. 2020 Oct;13(4):100934. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100934. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cesarean Delivery and Indications Among Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Women.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Aug;9(4):1161-1171. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01057-w. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Primary Cesarean Delivery Patterns among Women with Physical, Sensory, or Intellectual Disabilities.
Womens Health Issues. 2017 May-Jun;27(3):336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
6
Comparison of Breastfeeding Success by Mode of Delivery.
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Jul;41(10):1329-1336. doi: 10.1055/a-1906-8642. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
8
Risk of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Disabilities.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138414. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38414.
9
Effect of Trial of Labor before Cesarean and Risk of Subsequent Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.
Am J Perinatol. 2020 May;37(6):633-637. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685449. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Prevalence of Prolonged Latent Phase and Labor Outcomes: Review of Birth Records in a Swedish Population.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12704.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy and physical disability: A scoping review.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251338424. doi: 10.1177/17455057251338424. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Disability justice and collective access to labour and delivery care: a qualitative study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07036-3.
3
Experiences of women with impaired physical mobility during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum: A case study.
Eur J Midwifery. 2023 Oct 5;7:26. doi: 10.18332/ejm/170433. eCollection 2023.
4
The Right to Sexuality, Reproductive Health, and Found a Family for People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 15;20(2):1587. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021587.
5
Neonatal Outcomes of Mothers With a Disability.
Pediatrics. 2022 Sep 1;150(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-055318.
7
Risk of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Disabilities.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138414. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38414.
8
Prolonged postpartum length of hospital stay among women with disabilities.
Disabil Health J. 2020 Oct;13(4):100934. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100934. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
Miscarriage Occurrence and Prevention Efforts by Disability Status and Type in the United States.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Mar;29(3):345-352. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7880. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
Maternal disability and risk for pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;222(1):27.e1-27.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregnancy Outcomes Among Deaf Women in Washington State, 1987-2012.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):953-960. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002321.
2
Maternal Body Mass Index and Regional Anaesthesia Use at Term: Prevalence and Complications.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;31(6):495-505. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12387. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
3
Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities.
Disabil Health J. 2017 Jul;10(3):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
4
Primary Cesarean Delivery Patterns among Women with Physical, Sensory, or Intellectual Disabilities.
Womens Health Issues. 2017 May-Jun;27(3):336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
Pregnancy in spinal cord-injured women, a cohort study of 37 pregnancies in 25 women.
Spinal Cord. 2017 Feb;55(2):167-171. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.138. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Evaluation of outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Sep;30(17):2092-2096. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1237498. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
8
Maternal co-morbidities and neonatal outcomes associated with cystic fibrosis.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jan;30(1):4-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1161747. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Pregnancy Outcomes Among U.S. Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Sep;120(5):433-43. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-120.5.433.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验