Suppr超能文献

《热不燃、电子雾化和传统烟草燃烧卷烟的急性效应:罗马萨皮恩扎大学-血管评估吸烟致动脉粥样硬化前效应研究(SUR-VAPES)2 随机试验》。

Acute Effects of Heat-Not-Burn, Electronic Vaping, and Traditional Tobacco Combustion Cigarettes: The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking ( SUR - VAPES ) 2 Randomized Trial.

机构信息

1 Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Sapienza University of Rome Latina Italy.

2 IRCCS NEUROMED Pozzilli Italy.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e010455. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010455.

Abstract

Background Little clinical research on new-generation heat-not-burn cigarettes ( HNBC ) in comparison with electronic vaping cigarettes ( EVC ) and traditional tobacco combustion cigarettes ( TC ) has been reported. We aimed to appraise the acute effects of single use of HNBC , EVC, and TC in healthy smokers. Methods and Results This was an independent, cross-over, randomized trial in 20 TC smokers, with allocation to different cycles of HNBC , EVC , and TC . All participants used all types of products, with an intercycle washout of 1 week. End points were oxidative stress, antioxidant reserve, platelet activation, flow-mediated dilation, blood pressure, and satisfaction scores. Single use of any product led to an adverse impact on oxidative stress, antioxidant reserve, platelet function, flow-mediated dilation, and blood pressure. HNBC had less impact than EVC and TC on soluble Nox2-derived peptide (respectively, P=0.004 and 0.001), 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α- III ( P=0.004 and <0.001), and vitamin E ( P=0.018 and 0.044). HNBC and EVC were equally less impactful than TCs on flow-mediated dilation ( P=0.872 for HNBC versus EVC ), HO ( P=0.522), HO breakdown activity ( P=0.091), soluble CD 40 ligand ( P=0.849), and soluble P-selectin ( P=0.821). The effect of HNBC and, to a lesser extent EVC , on blood pressure was less evident than that of TC , whereas HNBC appeared more satisfying than EVC (all P<0.05). Conclusions Acute effects of HNBC , EVC, and TC are different on several oxidative stress, antioxidant reserve, platelet function, cardiovascular, and satisfaction dimensions, with TCs showing the most detrimental changes in clinically relevant features. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 03301129.

摘要

背景

与电子烟(EVC)和传统烟草燃烧香烟(TC)相比,新一代加热不燃烧香烟(HNBC)的临床研究较少。我们旨在评估健康吸烟者单次使用 HNBC、EVC 和 TC 的急性影响。

方法和结果

这是一项在 20 名 TC 吸烟者中进行的独立、交叉、随机试验,分为不同的 HNBC、EVC 和 TC 循环。所有参与者都使用了所有类型的产品,每个周期之间的洗脱期为 1 周。终点是氧化应激、抗氧化储备、血小板活化、血流介导的扩张、血压和满意度评分。任何产品的单次使用都会对氧化应激、抗氧化储备、血小板功能、血流介导的扩张和血压产生不良影响。与 EVC 和 TC 相比,HNBC 对可溶性 Nox2 衍生肽(分别为 P=0.004 和 0.001)、8-异前列腺素 F2α-III(P=0.004 和 <0.001)和维生素 E(P=0.018 和 0.044)的影响较小。与 TC 相比,HNBC 和 EVC 对血流介导的扩张(P=0.872 用于 HNBC 与 EVC)、HO(P=0.522)、HO 分解活性(P=0.091)、可溶性 CD40 配体(P=0.849)和可溶性 P 选择素(P=0.821)的影响同样较小。与 TC 相比,HNBC 和 EVC 对血压的影响不太明显,而 HNBC 似乎比 EVC 更令人满意(均 P<0.05)。

结论

HNBC、EVC 和 TC 的急性影响在几个氧化应激、抗氧化储备、血小板功能、心血管和满意度方面存在差异,TC 在临床相关特征方面显示出最不利的变化。

临床试验注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT 03301129。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a548/6475061/05fc2f348b8c/JAH3-8-e010455-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验