• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚马逊土耳其机器人平台的参与者在评价性主观幸福感方面显著低于其他调查参与者。

MTurk Participants Have Substantially Lower Evaluative Subjective Well-Being Than Other Survey Participants.

作者信息

Stone Arthur A, Walentynowicz Marta, Schneider Stefan, Junghaenel Doerte U, Wen Cheng K

机构信息

Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California, 635 Downey WayLos Angeles, CA 90089, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, 3620 South McClintock Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.

出版信息

Comput Human Behav. 2019 May;94:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.042. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.042
PMID:30880871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6417833/
Abstract

Amazon's MTurk platform has become a popular site for obtaining relatively inexpensive and convenient adult samples for use in behavioral research. Concerns have been raised about selection issues, because MTurk workers chose to participate in the platform and select the tasks they perform (of many offered to them). Prior studies have documented demographic and psychological differences with national samples. In this paper we studied evaluative subjective well-being (the Cantril Ladder) in an MTurk sample, a national Internet panel sample, and a national telephone survey conducted by Gallup-Sharecare. A surprising finding was that MTurk participants' Ladder scores were substantial lower than the other two samples. Analyses controlling for six demographic differences among the samples only slightly reduced the mean differences. However, patterns of demographic-well-being associations were similar within the samples. To corroborate these results, we conducted a secondary analysis on another three samples, one MTurk sample and two Internet panel samples. The same group differences in Ladder scores were observed. These findings add to the growing literature documenting the characteristics of MTurk samples and we discuss the implications for future research with such samples.

摘要

亚马逊的土耳其机器人(MTurk)平台已成为一个热门网站,可用于获取相对廉价且便捷的成人样本,以用于行为研究。由于MTurk平台的工人是自行选择参与该平台并挑选他们要执行的任务(众多提供给他们的任务中),因此人们对样本选择问题提出了担忧。先前的研究已经记录了MTurk样本与全国样本在人口统计学和心理方面的差异。在本文中,我们研究了MTurk样本、一个全国性互联网小组样本以及盖洛普-Sharecare进行的全国电话调查中的评估性主观幸福感(坎特里尔阶梯量表)。一个惊人的发现是,MTurk参与者的阶梯量表得分显著低于其他两个样本。对样本间六个人口统计学差异进行控制的分析仅略微缩小了均值差异。然而,各样本中人口统计学与幸福感之间的关联模式是相似的。为了证实这些结果,我们对另外三个样本进行了二次分析,一个MTurk样本和两个互联网小组样本。在阶梯量表得分上观察到了相同的组间差异。这些发现进一步丰富了记录MTurk样本特征的文献,并且我们讨论了对此类样本未来研究的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305e/6417833/140a09693d1e/nihms-1518085-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305e/6417833/90b566b5e405/nihms-1518085-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305e/6417833/de4705c65e5f/nihms-1518085-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305e/6417833/140a09693d1e/nihms-1518085-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305e/6417833/90b566b5e405/nihms-1518085-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305e/6417833/de4705c65e5f/nihms-1518085-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/305e/6417833/140a09693d1e/nihms-1518085-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
MTurk Participants Have Substantially Lower Evaluative Subjective Well-Being Than Other Survey Participants.亚马逊土耳其机器人平台的参与者在评价性主观幸福感方面显著低于其他调查参与者。
Comput Human Behav. 2019 May;94:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.042. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
2
Self-reported Health Status Differs for Amazon's Mechanical Turk Respondents Compared With Nationally Representative Surveys.与全国代表性调查相比,亚马逊土耳其机器人受访者自我报告的健康状况有所不同。
Med Care. 2018 Mar;56(3):211-215. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000871.
3
Is Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) a comparable recruitment source for trauma studies?亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk(MTurk)是否可以作为创伤研究的一种可比较的招募来源?
Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):381-388. doi: 10.1037/tra0000502. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
4
The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research.在亚马逊土耳其机器人研究中评估临床现象的重要性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):684-91. doi: 10.1037/pas0000217. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Conducting Online Behavioral Research Using Crowdsourcing Services in Japan.在日本利用众包服务进行在线行为研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 14;8:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00378. eCollection 2017.
6
Characteristics of a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Sample Recruited Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk.使用亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk 招募轻度创伤性脑损伤样本的特征。
PM R. 2018 Jan;10(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.细心的土耳其工人:与样本库参与者相比,亚马逊土耳其机器人平台的参与者在在线注意力测试中的表现更好。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):400-7. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z.
8
Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Patient Nondisclosure of Medically Relevant Information to Clinicians.患者向临床医生隐瞒与医疗相关信息的流行率及相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e185293. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5293.
9
Who Are the Turkers? A Characterization of MTurk Workers Using the Personality Assessment Inventory.《土耳其工人是谁?使用人格评估量表对 MTurk 工人的特征描述》
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):759-766. doi: 10.1177/1073191118760709. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
10
Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.?Mechanical Turk 工人样本是否能代表美国的健康状况和健康行为?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0198835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198835. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The Daily Lives of Crowdsourced U.S. Respondents: A Time Use Comparison of MTurk, Prolific, and ATUS.众包的美国受访者的日常生活:亚马逊土耳其机器人、Prolific和美国时间使用调查(ATUS)的比较
Sociol Methodol. 2025 Jan 25. doi: 10.1177/00811750241312226.
2
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of a Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Identity Scale: Survey Study With Two Independent Samples of Adults in the United States.评估身体活动和久坐行为认同量表的心理测量特性:对美国两个独立成年人样本的调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 24;8:e59950. doi: 10.2196/59950.
3
Women's preferences for a new contraceptive under development: an exploratory study.

本文引用的文献

1
The MTurkification of Social and Personality Psychology.社会与人格心理学的 MTurk 化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;45(6):842-850. doi: 10.1177/0146167218798821. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
2
Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.?Mechanical Turk 工人样本是否能代表美国的健康状况和健康行为?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0198835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198835. eCollection 2018.
3
Who Are the Turkers? A Characterization of MTurk Workers Using the Personality Assessment Inventory.
女性对一种正在研发的新型避孕药具的偏好:一项探索性研究。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Jul 21;4:1095112. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1095112. eCollection 2023.
4
Policies and Price Tags: The Public's Perception of Face Transplantation and Its Funding.政策与价格标签:公众对脸部移植及其资金问题的看法。
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2022 Dec;15(4):295-303. doi: 10.1177/19433875211047025. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Vague quantifiers demonstrate little susceptibility to frame of reference effects.模糊量词对参照系效应的敏感度较低。
Appl Res Qual Life. 2022 Feb;17(1):317-331. doi: 10.1007/s11482-020-09889-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
A meta-analysis of financial self-control strategies: Comparing empirical findings with online media and lay person perspectives on what helps individuals curb spending and start saving.财务自我控制策略的元分析:将实证研究结果与在线媒体和非专业人士的观点进行比较,以了解哪些方法有助于个人控制支出和开始储蓄。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 8;16(7):e0253938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253938. eCollection 2021.
7
The relationship between precarious employment and subjective well-being in Korean wage workers through the Cantril ladder Scale.通过坎特里尔阶梯量表探究韩国工薪阶层不稳定就业与主观幸福感之间的关系。
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020 Apr 17;32:e11. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e11. eCollection 2020.
8
Evaluating the Effect of Daily Diary Instructional Phrases on Respondents' Recall Time Frames: Survey Experiment.评估每日日记指导语对受访者回忆时间框架的影响:调查实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 21;22(2):e16105. doi: 10.2196/16105.
《土耳其工人是谁?使用人格评估量表对 MTurk 工人的特征描述》
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):759-766. doi: 10.1177/1073191118760709. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
4
Understanding context effects for a measure of life evaluation: how responses matter.理解生活评价指标中的情境效应:反应的重要性。
Oxf Econ Pap. 2016 Oct;68(4):861-870. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpw022. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
5
Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.用于组织研究的亚马逊土耳其机器人的系统视角:综述与建议
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 8;8:1359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01359. eCollection 2017.
6
Buying time promotes happiness.花钱买时间能提升幸福感。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 8;114(32):8523-8527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706541114. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.利用众包便利样本进行临床研究。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
8
The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research.在亚马逊土耳其机器人研究中评估临床现象的重要性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):684-91. doi: 10.1037/pas0000217. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
9
Eyewitness memory: The impact of a negative mood during encoding and/or retrieval upon recall of a non-emotive event.目击者记忆:编码和/或提取过程中的消极情绪对非情感事件回忆的影响。
Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):838-52. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1058955. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?主观幸福感的衡量标准如何用于为公共政策提供信息?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):71-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x.