• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估每日日记指导语对受访者回忆时间框架的影响:调查实验。

Evaluating the Effect of Daily Diary Instructional Phrases on Respondents' Recall Time Frames: Survey Experiment.

作者信息

Stone Arthur A, Wen Cheng K Fred, Schneider Stefan, Junghaenel Doerte U

机构信息

Center for Self-Report Science and Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 21;22(2):e16105. doi: 10.2196/16105.

DOI:10.2196/16105
PMID:32130129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7060498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Daily diaries are extensively used for examining participants' daily experience in behavioral and medical science. However, little attention is paid to whether participants recall their experiences within the time frames prescribed by the task.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe survey respondents' self-reported recall time frames and to evaluate the impact of different daily diary items on respondents' reported affective states.

METHODS

In this study, 577 participants completed a mood survey with one of the following 4 time frame instructions: (1) today, (2) since waking up today, (3) during the last 24 hours, or (4) in the last day. They were also asked to indicate the periods they considered when answering these items and to recall the instructional phrases associated with the items.

RESULTS

Almost all participants in the today (141/146, 96.6%) and since waking up today (136/145, 93.8%) conditions reported using periods consistent with our expectations, whereas a lower proportion was observed in the during the last 24 hours (100/145, 69.0%) condition. A diverse range of responses was observed in the in the last day condition. Furthermore, the instructions influenced the levels of some self-reported affects, although exploratory analyses were not able to identify the mechanism underlying this finding.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these results indicate that today and since waking up today are the most effective instructional phrases for inquiring about daily experience and that investigators should use caution when using the other 2 instructional phrases.

摘要

背景

日常日记被广泛用于研究行为科学和医学领域参与者的日常经历。然而,对于参与者是否能在任务规定的时间范围内回忆起他们的经历,却很少有人关注。

目的

本研究旨在描述调查对象自我报告的回忆时间范围,并评估不同的日常日记条目对调查对象报告的情感状态的影响。

方法

在本研究中,577名参与者完成了一项情绪调查,调查给出了以下4种时间范围指示中的一种:(1)今天;(2)从今天醒来开始;(3)在过去24小时内;(4)在过去一天内。他们还被要求指出在回答这些条目时所考虑的时间段,并回忆与这些条目相关的指示性短语。

结果

在“今天”(141/146,96.6%)和“从今天醒来开始”(136/145,93.8%)这两种情况下,几乎所有参与者报告使用的时间段都符合我们的预期,而在“在过去24小时内”(100/145,69.0%)这种情况下,观察到的比例较低。在“在过去一天内”这种情况下观察到了各种各样的回答。此外,这些指示影响了一些自我报告情感的水平,尽管探索性分析未能确定这一发现背后的机制。

结论

总体而言,这些结果表明,“今天”和“从今天醒来开始”是询问日常经历最有效的指示性短语,研究人员在使用其他两种指示性短语时应谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/becb/7060498/91de20955e69/jmir_v22i2e16105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/becb/7060498/91de20955e69/jmir_v22i2e16105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/becb/7060498/91de20955e69/jmir_v22i2e16105_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Effect of Daily Diary Instructional Phrases on Respondents' Recall Time Frames: Survey Experiment.评估每日日记指导语对受访者回忆时间框架的影响:调查实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 21;22(2):e16105. doi: 10.2196/16105.
2
Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial.使用游戏内奖励激励每日自我报告依从性:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 3;21(1):e11683. doi: 10.2196/11683.
3
Comparison of 7-day recall and daily diary reports of COPD symptoms and impacts.比较 COPD 症状和影响的 7 天回忆和日常日记报告。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):466-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
4
Recording sexual behavior: comparison of recall questionnaires with a coital diary.性行为记录:回忆问卷与性交日记的比较
Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Aug;26(7):374-80. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199908000-00002.
5
Optimising daily diary questionnaires about fatigue, psychological flexibility and well-being: perspectives of people with rheumatic disease.优化关于疲劳、心理灵活性和幸福感的日常日记问卷:风湿性疾病患者的观点。
Psychol Health. 2019 Feb;34(2):181-199. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1520232. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
6
The effect of neuroticism on the recall of persistent low-back pain and perceived activity interference.神经质对持续性腰痛回忆和感知活动干扰的影响。
J Pain. 2013 Sep;14(9):948-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 May 16.
7
Revalidation of description of constipation in terms of recall bias and visual scale analog questionnaire.从回忆偏倚和视觉模拟量表问卷角度对便秘描述的再验证
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Dec;18(12):1417-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03155.x.
8
Evaluation of different recall periods for the US National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE.对美国国立癌症研究所的PRO-CTCAE不同召回期的评估。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):255-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774517698645. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Progressive 24-Hour Recall: Usability Study of Short Retention Intervals in Web-Based Dietary Assessment Surveys.渐进式24小时回忆法:基于网络的饮食评估调查中短保留间隔的可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 3;22(2):e13266. doi: 10.2196/13266.
10
The effect of different recall periods on estimates of acute gastroenteritis in the United States, FoodNet Population Survey 2006–2007.不同回忆时间段对美国急性肠胃炎估计数的影响,2006-2007 年食源性疾病监测网络人群调查。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Oct;7(10):1225-8. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0567.

引用本文的文献

1
ESM-Q: A consensus-based quality assessment tool for experience sampling method items.ESM-Q:一种基于共识的经验抽样法项目质量评估工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Mar 21;57(4):124. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02626-1.
2
Examining Stress and Residual Symptoms in Remitted and Partially Remitted Depression Using a Wearable Electrodermal Activity Device: A Pilot Study.使用可穿戴皮肤电活动设备检查缓解和部分缓解抑郁症中的压力和残留症状:一项初步研究。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2022 Dec 12;11:96-106. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3228483. eCollection 2023.
3
The Experience Sampling Method in Monitoring Social Interactions Among Children and Adolescents in School: A Systematic Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
MTurk Participants Have Substantially Lower Evaluative Subjective Well-Being Than Other Survey Participants.亚马逊土耳其机器人平台的参与者在评价性主观幸福感方面显著低于其他调查参与者。
Comput Human Behav. 2019 May;94:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.042. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
2
The effects of time frames on self-report.时间框架对自我报告的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201655. eCollection 2018.
3
Daily Pain Measurements and Retrospective Pain Measurements in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients With Intermittent Pain.
学校中监测儿童和青少年社交互动的经验抽样法:一项系统文献综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 4;13:844698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844698. eCollection 2022.
4
A Systematic Review of Momentary Assessment Designs for Mood and Anxiety Symptoms.情绪与焦虑症状即时评估设计的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2021 May 17;12:642044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642044. eCollection 2021.
5
The Effect of Training on Participant Adherence With a Reporting Time Frame for Momentary Subjective Experiences in Ecological Momentary Assessment: Cognitive Interview Study.训练对生态瞬时评估中瞬时主观体验报告时间框架下参与者依从性的影响:认知访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 26;5(5):e28007. doi: 10.2196/28007.
6
Investigating the Use of Electronic Well-being Diaries Completed Within a Psychoeducation Program for University Students: Longitudinal Text Analysis Study.调查大学生心理教育计划中完成的电子健康日记的使用情况:纵向文本分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 22;23(4):e25279. doi: 10.2196/25279.
髋关节骨关节炎间歇性疼痛患者的日常疼痛测量和回顾性疼痛测量。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jun;71(6):768-776. doi: 10.1002/acr.23711. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research.群体到个体的泛化不足是对人类受试者研究的一种威胁。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):E6106-E6115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711978115. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
Who Are the Turkers? A Characterization of MTurk Workers Using the Personality Assessment Inventory.《土耳其工人是谁?使用人格评估量表对 MTurk 工人的特征描述》
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):759-766. doi: 10.1177/1073191118760709. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments.网络生活质量评估中的草率回应。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Apr;27(4):1077-1088. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1767-2. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
7
Psychological stress declines rapidly from age 50 in the United States: Yet another well-being paradox.美国人在 50 岁以后心理压力迅速下降:又一个幸福悖论。
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Dec;103:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
Content Validity for the VVSymQ Instrument: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for the Assessment of Varicose Veins Symptoms.VVSymQ 工具的内容效度:一种用于评估静脉曲张症状的新的患者报告结局指标。
Patient. 2017 Feb;10(1):51-63. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0183-y.
9
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.利用众包便利样本进行临床研究。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research.在亚马逊土耳其机器人研究中评估临床现象的重要性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):684-91. doi: 10.1037/pas0000217. Epub 2015 Aug 24.