Suppr超能文献

高流量氧疗在恢复性高碳酸血症性急性呼吸衰竭患者中断无创通气后的应用:一项生理交叉试验。

High-Flow Oxygen Therapy After Noninvasive Ventilation Interruption in Patients Recovering From Hypercapnic Acute Respiratory Failure: A Physiological Crossover Trial.

机构信息

Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sant'Andrea Hospital, ASL VC, Vercelli, Italy.

Department of Clinical, Integrated and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), Respiratory and Critical Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater University, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e506-e511. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003740.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Assessing gas exchange, diaphragm function, respiratory rate, and patient comfort during high-flow oxygen therapy and standard oxygen at the time of noninvasive ventilation discontinuation.

DESIGN

Randomized crossover physiologic study.

SETTING

Two ICUs.

PATIENTS

Thirty chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure receiving noninvasive ventilation greater than 24 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent five 30-minute trials, the first, third, and fifth trial in noninvasive ventilation, whereas the second and fourth were randomly conducted with either standard oxygen and high-flow oxygen therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Diaphragm displacement and thickening fraction were determined by sonographic evaluation at the end of each trial. Arterial blood gases, respiratory rate, and patient comfort were also assessed. PaCO2 (p = 0.153) and pH (p = 0.114) were not different among trials, while PaO2 was greater in noninvasive ventilation than with both standard oxygen (p ≤ 0.005) and high-flow oxygen therapy (p ≤ 0.001). The diaphragm displacement was no different among trials (p = 0.875), while its thickening fraction was greater with standard oxygen, compared with high-flow oxygen therapy and all noninvasive ventilation trials (p < 0.001 for all comparisons), without differences between high-flow oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation. Respiratory rate also increased with standard oxygen, compared with both high-flow oxygen therapy (p < 0.001) and noninvasive ventilation (p < 0.01). High-flow oxygen therapy improved comfort, compared with standard oxygen (p = 0.004) and noninvasive ventilation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

At the time of noninvasive ventilation interruption, PaCO2 and diaphragm displacement remained unchanged regardless of the modality of oxygen administration. However, although standard oxygen resulted in a remarkable increase in diaphragm thickening fraction, high-flow oxygen therapy allowed maintaining it unchanged, while improving patient comfort.

摘要

目的

评估高流量氧疗和标准氧在无创通气停止时的气体交换、膈肌功能、呼吸频率和患者舒适度。

设计

随机交叉生理研究。

设置

两个 ICU。

患者

30 例慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并高碳酸血症性急性呼吸衰竭患者,接受无创通气超过 24 小时。

干预措施

所有患者均进行了 5 次 30 分钟的试验,前 3 次和第 5 次在无创通气中进行,而第 2 次和第 4 次则随机进行标准氧和高流量氧疗。

测量和主要结果

在每次试验结束时,通过超声评估膈肌位移和增厚分数。还评估了动脉血气、呼吸频率和患者舒适度。PaCO2(p = 0.153)和 pH(p = 0.114)在各试验之间无差异,而 PaO2 在无创通气中高于标准氧(p ≤ 0.005)和高流量氧疗(p ≤ 0.001)。各试验之间的膈肌位移无差异(p = 0.875),而标准氧的膈肌增厚分数大于高流量氧疗和所有无创通气试验(所有比较 p < 0.001),高流量氧疗与无创通气之间无差异。与高流量氧疗(p < 0.001)和无创通气(p < 0.01)相比,呼吸频率也随标准氧的增加而增加。与标准氧(p = 0.004)和无创通气(p < 0.001)相比,高流量氧疗可改善舒适度。

结论

在无创通气停止时,无论给氧方式如何,PaCO2 和膈肌位移均保持不变。然而,尽管标准氧导致膈肌增厚分数显著增加,但高流量氧疗可保持其不变,同时改善患者舒适度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验