NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York.
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Oct;20(10):1507-1515. doi: 10.1111/jch.13386. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
Left ventricular hypertrophy develops in 36%-41% of hypertensive patients and independently predicts cardiovascular events and total mortality. Moreover, drug-induced reduction in left ventricular mass (LVM) correlates with improved prognosis. The optimal thiazide-type diuretic for reducing LVM is unknown. Evidence regarding potency, cardiovascular events, sodium, and potassium suggested the hypothesis that "CHIP" diuretics (CHlorthalidone, Indapamide, and Potassium-sparing diuretic/hydrochlorothiazide [PSD/HCTZ]) would reduce LVM more than HCTZ. Systematic searches of five databases were conducted. Among the 38 randomized trials, a 1% reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) predicted a 1% reduction in LVM, P = 0.00001. CHIP-HCTZ differences in reducing LVM differed across trials (ie, heterogeneity), making interpretation uncertain. However, among the 28 double-blind trials, heterogeneity was undetectable, and HCTZ reduced LVM (percent reduction [95% CI]) by -7.3 (-10.4, -4.2), P < 0.0001. CHIP diuretics surpassed HCTZ in reducing LVM: chlorthalidone -8.2 (-14.7, -1.6), P = 0.015; indapamide -7.5 (-12.7, -2.3), P = 0.005; and all CHIP diuretics combined -7.7 (-12.2, -3.1), P < 0.001. The comparison of PSD/HCTZ with HCTZ had low statistical power but favored PSD/HCTZ: -6.0 (-14.1, +2.1), P = 0.149. Thus, compared to HCTZ, CHIP diuretics had twice the effect on LVM. CHIP diuretics did not surpass HCTZ in reducing systolic or diastolic blood pressure: -0.3 (-5.0, +4.3) and -1.6 (-5.6, +2.4), respectively. The strength of evidence that CHIP diuretics surpass HCTZ for reducing LVM was high (GRADE criteria). In conclusion, these novel results have demonstrated that CHIP diuretics reduce LVM 2-fold more than HCTZ among hypertensive patients. Although generally related to LVM, blood pressure fails to explain the superiority of CHIP diuretics for reducing LVM.
左心室肥厚在 36%-41%的高血压患者中发展,并独立预测心血管事件和总死亡率。此外,药物诱导的左心室质量(LVM)减少与改善预后相关。降低 LVM 的最佳噻嗪类利尿剂尚不清楚。关于效力、心血管事件、钠和钾的证据表明了一个假设,即“CHIP”利尿剂(氯噻酮、吲达帕胺和保钾利尿剂/氢氯噻嗪[PSD/HCTZ])将比 HCTZ 更能降低 LVM。对五个数据库进行了系统搜索。在 38 项随机试验中,收缩压(SBP)降低 1%预测 LVM 降低 1%,P=0.00001。CHIP-HCTZ 在降低 LVM 方面的差异因试验而异(即存在异质性),因此解释不确定。然而,在 28 项双盲试验中,异质性不可检测,HCTZ 降低 LVM(百分比降低[95%CI])为-7.3(-10.4,-4.2),P<0.0001。CHIP 利尿剂在降低 LVM 方面优于 HCTZ:氯噻酮-8.2(-14.7,-1.6),P=0.015;吲达帕胺-7.5(-12.7,-2.3),P=0.005;所有 CHIP 利尿剂联合-7.7(-12.2,-3.1),P<0.001。与 HCTZ 相比,PSD/HCTZ 的比较统计学效能较低,但有利于 PSD/HCTZ:-6.0(-14.1,+2.1),P=0.149。因此,与 HCTZ 相比,CHIP 利尿剂对 LVM 的影响增加了一倍。CHIP 利尿剂在降低收缩压或舒张压方面并未优于 HCTZ:-0.3(-5.0,+4.3)和-1.6(-5.6,+2.4)。CHIP 利尿剂在降低 LVM 方面优于 HCTZ 的证据强度很高(GRADE 标准)。总之,这些新结果表明,CHIP 利尿剂在高血压患者中使 LVM 降低 2 倍,而与 HCTZ 相比,CHIP 利尿剂在降低收缩压或舒张压方面并没有优势。