• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CBCT 图像上 3D 牙和骨骼标志点的可靠性。

Reliability of 3D dental and skeletal landmarks on CBCT images.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):758-767. doi: 10.2319/082018-612.1. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

DOI:10.2319/082018-612.1
PMID:30883187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8111847/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To quantify reliability of three-dimensional skeletal landmarks and a comprehensive set of dental landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to determine the shapes of envelope of error.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three judges located 31 skeletal landmarks and 60 dental landmarks on the pre- and posttreatment CBCT images of 22 patients. Landmark error was determined by calculating the distance of deviation of landmark locations around their average. Standard deviation and mean radial spherical error were calculated. Scatterplots were constructed to characterize envelope of error.

RESULTS

The midline landmarks of the cranial base were highly reliable. Bilateral skeletal landmarks tended to have larger error than midline landmarks. Among the nonconventional landmarks, fronto-zygomatic suture, condyle, and mental foramen showed relatively high reliability. However, foramen spinosum and temporal fossa showed larger errors. Gonion was the least reliable landmark. Most dental landmarks were located more reliably than skeletal landmarks. The highest reliability was found at incisal edges. Mesiobuccal cusp of first molars also showed high reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in the size and shape of the distributions of errors of different landmarks. Most landmarks showed elongated envelopes. Bilateral structures tended to show greater errors than midline structures. Most dental landmarks were more reliable than skeletal landmarks.

摘要

目的

定量分析锥形束 CT(CBCT)中三维骨骼标志点和全面的牙齿标志点的可靠性,并确定误差范围的形状。

材料与方法

3 位评估者在 22 名患者的治疗前后 CBCT 图像上定位了 31 个骨骼标志点和 60 个牙齿标志点。通过计算标志点位置围绕平均值的偏差距离来确定标志点误差。计算了标准差和平均径向球差。绘制散点图以表征误差范围。

结果

颅底中线标志点具有高度可靠性。双侧骨骼标志点的误差往往大于中线标志点。在非传统标志点中,额颧缝、髁突和颏孔显示出相对较高的可靠性。然而,棘突和颞窝的误差较大。髁突是最不可靠的标志点。大多数牙齿标志点的定位比骨骼标志点更可靠。切缘的可靠性最高。第一磨牙的近中颊尖也显示出较高的可靠性。

结论

不同标志点的误差分布大小和形状存在差异。大多数标志点的误差范围呈拉长状。双侧结构的误差往往大于中线结构。大多数牙齿标志点比骨骼标志点更可靠。

相似文献

1
Reliability of 3D dental and skeletal landmarks on CBCT images.CBCT 图像上 3D 牙和骨骼标志点的可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):758-767. doi: 10.2319/082018-612.1. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行三维头影测量分析时,解剖结构作为标志点的可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Sep;84(5):762-72. doi: 10.2319/090413-652.1. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
3
A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.一种基于知识的算法,用于在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像上自动检测头影测量标志点。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Nov;10(11):1737-52. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1173-6. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
4
Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.接收时与定向的容积再现锥形束计算机断层扫描图像之间手动标志点识别的精度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):118-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.027.
5
Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.比较 Galileos 和 i-CAT 锥形束 CT 受试者图像上三维头影测量标志点识别的观察者可靠性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(9):20130059. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130059. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
6
Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.不同三维头影测量标志点在锥形束 CT 中的可靠性:系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):317-332. doi: 10.2319/042018-302.1. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.锥形束计算机断层扫描上新型三维颅面标志点的开发与验证
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Oct;30(7):e611-e615. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005627.
8
Malocclusion Class II division 1 skeletal and dental relationships measured by cone-beam computed tomography.用锥形束计算机断层扫描测量安氏II类1分类错牙合的骨骼和牙齿关系。
Int Orthod. 2017 Sep;15(3):365-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
9
In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.磁共振成像中三维头影测量标志点确定的体内可靠性:一项可行性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1339-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03015-7. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
10
Reliability of CBCT in the diagnosis of dental asymmetry.锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在牙列不对称诊断中的可靠性
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Mar-Apr;19(2):90-5. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.090-095.oar.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy and reliability of automated landmark identification and cephalometric measurements on cone beam computed tomography using Invivo software.使用Invivo软件在锥形束计算机断层扫描上进行自动标志点识别和头影测量的准确性和可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2025 Apr 10;95(4):362-70. doi: 10.2319/122324-1049.1.
2
Automatic identification of hard and soft tissue landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography via deep learning with diversity datasets: a methodological study.通过具有多样性数据集的深度学习在锥形束计算机断层扫描中自动识别硬组织和软组织标志点:一项方法学研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05831-8.
3
A novel approach to craniofacial analysis using automated 3D landmarking of the skull.一种使用颅骨自动 3D 标志点进行颅面分析的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 29;14(1):12381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63137-1.
4
Shape variation and sex differences of the adult human mandible evaluated by geometric morphometrics.采用几何形态测量学评估成人下颌骨的形态变异和性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 12;14(1):8546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57617-7.
5
Automated 3D Landmarking of the Skull: A Novel Approach for Craniofacial Analysis.颅骨的自动三维地标定位:一种用于颅面分析的新方法。
bioRxiv. 2024 Feb 12:2024.02.09.579642. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.09.579642.
6
Integrating Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D-Printed Tools with Iliac Bone Grafts for Orbital and Zygomatic Reconstruction in Hemifacial Microsomia Patients.将虚拟手术规划和3D打印工具与髂骨移植相结合用于半侧颜面短小畸形患者的眼眶和颧骨重建
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 6;12(24):7538. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247538.
7
Concordance and reproducibility in the location of reference points for a volumetric craniofacial analysis: Cross-sectional study.用于体积颅面分析的参考点定位的一致性和可重复性:横断面研究。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023 Spring;17(2):87-95. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2023.37025. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
Comparison of three-dimensional maxillary growth across spheno-occipital synchondrosis maturation stages.比较蝶枕结合部成熟阶段的三种上颌骨生长方式。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Feb 14;23(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02774-w.
9
Comparison of spheno-occipital synchondrosis maturation stages with three-dimensional assessment of mandibular growth.蝶枕结合部成熟度分期与下颌骨生长的三维评估比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 30;22(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02692-3.
10
Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability.锥束计算机断层扫描上的自动地标识别:准确性与可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Sep 1;92(5):642-654. doi: 10.2319/122121-928.1. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.不同三维头影测量标志点在锥形束 CT 中的可靠性:系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):317-332. doi: 10.2319/042018-302.1. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
2
Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的三维头影测量标志点的可靠性和可重复性:一项系统评价
J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):112-9. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140336.
3
Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation.用于骨科和正颌外科评估的锥形束计算机断层扫描快速三维叠加
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;44(9):1188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
4
Reproducibility of landmark identification in the jaw and teeth on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.颌骨和牙齿的三维锥形束 CT 图像中标志点识别的可重复性。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):843-9. doi: 10.2319/010711-5.1. Epub 2011 May 13.
5
Cranial base foramen location accuracy and reliability in cone-beam computerized tomography.颅底骨孔在锥形束计算机断层扫描中的定位准确性和可靠性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):e203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.027.
6
The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics.口腔正畸学中锥形束计算机断层成像的现状。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Jan;40(1):24-34. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/12615645.
7
Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.传统头影测量标志点在三维分析中对上颌扩弓治疗的可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Nov;79(6):1047-56. doi: 10.2319/010509-10R.1.
8
Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.生长发育期患者的三维锥形束计算机断层扫描模型的叠加
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018.
9
Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.采用95%置信椭圆法测定三维计算机断层扫描图像上颌面解剖标志点的可重复性。
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):396-402. doi: 10.2319/040207-166.1.
10
The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification.头部影像测量的可靠性。1. 标志点识别。
Am J Orthod. 1971 Aug;60(2):111-27. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90028-5.