Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May;44(5):595-603. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100306. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Two ultrasound (US)-guided techniques for greater occipital nerve (GON) block have been described for the management of headache disorders: a "proximal or central" technique targeting the GON at the level of the second cervical vertebra and a "distal or peripheral" technique targeting the GON at the level of the superior nuchal line. In this multicenter, prospective, randomized control trial, we compared accuracy, effectiveness, and safety of these two techniques in patients with chronic migraines (CMs).
Forty patients with refractory CMs were randomized to receive either a proximal or distal US-guided GON block with bupivacaine and methylprednisolone acetate. The primary outcome was the difference in Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for headache intensity at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were effectiveness, performance, and safety-related. Effectiveness-related outcomes included NRS for headache intensity, number of headache days per week, patient satisfaction, quality of life, assessment of sleep quality, and sleep interruption. Performance-related outcomes included procedure time, accuracy of block, and patient discomfort. Safety-related outcomes included an assessment for adverse effects.
NRS pain scores were significantly reduced at 24 hours and at 1 week postprocedure in both cohorts and at 1 and 3 months in the proximal group as compared with the baseline. There was no significant difference in NRS pain scores between the two cohorts at any of the follow-up time points. There was a significant reduction in number of headache days per week at 1 month in both groups, and a significant improvement in sleep interruption at 1 week in both groups. There were no significant adverse effects.
This study was designed to compare two different US-guided approaches for blocking the GON. Our results demonstrate that both distal and proximal techniques can provide a short-term improvement in headache intensity, reduction in number of headache days per week, and an improvement in sleep interruption. The proximal GON technique may confer more sustained analgesic benefit compared with the distal approach in patients with CM headaches.
NCT02031822.
有两种超声(US)引导的方法可用于治疗头痛疾病,即针对第二颈椎水平的枕大神经(GON)的“近端或中央”技术和针对上项线水平的 GON 的“远端或外周”技术。在这项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验中,我们比较了这两种技术在慢性偏头痛(CM)患者中的准确性、有效性和安全性。
40 名难治性 CM 患者随机接受布比卡因和甲泼尼龙醋酸酯的近端或远端 US 引导的 GON 阻滞。主要结局是 1 个月时头痛强度的数字评分(NRS)差异。次要结局为有效性、性能和安全性相关。有效性相关的结局包括头痛强度的 NRS、每周头痛天数、患者满意度、生活质量、睡眠质量评估和睡眠中断。性能相关的结局包括手术时间、阻滞的准确性和患者不适。安全性相关的结局包括对不良反应的评估。
两组患者在 24 小时和 1 周时的 NRS 疼痛评分均显著降低,与基线相比,近端组在 1 个月和 3 个月时也显著降低。在任何随访时间点,两组患者的 NRS 疼痛评分均无显著差异。两组患者每周头痛天数均显著减少,两组患者的睡眠中断均在 1 周时显著改善。没有出现显著的不良反应。
本研究旨在比较两种不同的 US 引导方法来阻滞 GON。我们的结果表明,近端和远端技术都可以在短期内改善头痛强度、减少每周头痛天数和改善睡眠中断。与远端技术相比,GON 近端技术可能为 CM 头痛患者提供更持久的镇痛效果。
NCT02031822。