Milner Allison, King Tania L, Kavanagh Anne
Disability and Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Global and Population Heath, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne Disability Institute, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Feb 23;14:100826. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100826. eCollection 2019 Jun.
The health and human care workforce comprise a substantial and increasing proportion of the employed population in high income countries. This diverse workforce is comprised of high skilled workers, such as doctors and nurses, as well as lower skilled workers such as carers and support workers. This paper assessed psychosocial working conditions among health and human care workers compared to other workers. We also examined the effects of psychosocial working conditions on mental health. The data source was 16 waves of the Household Income Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. The exposure was a multidimensional, previously validated psychosocial job quality index. The outcome was changes in the Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5). The effect modifier was a multicategory health and human care occupational variable. Random and fixed effects linear regression models were used to unpack between- versus within- person differences. Time varying confounders were controlled for. We found evidence of effect modification. Carers and support workers experienced a 4.90-point decline (95% CI -6.23 to 3.57) on the MHI-5 when reporting 3 or more job stressors compared to no stressors. These workers also reported lower levels of mental health than other occupational groups and had greater exposure to poor psychosocial working environments. Health workers also reported substantial declines on the MHI-5 when exposed to 3 or more job stressors (-3.50, 95% CI -5.05 to -1.94). Understanding the quality of employment in this workforce, and consequent impacts of this employment on mental health is critical to ensuring sustainable individual, organizational and client-related outcomes.
在高收入国家,卫生和社会护理劳动力在就业人口中所占比例相当大且呈上升趋势。这支多样化的劳动力队伍包括医生和护士等高技能工人,以及护理人员和辅助人员等低技能工人。本文评估了卫生和社会护理工作者与其他工作者相比的心理社会工作条件。我们还研究了心理社会工作条件对心理健康的影响。数据来源是澳大利亚家庭收入与劳动力动态调查的16轮数据。暴露因素是一个多维的、先前经过验证的心理社会工作质量指数。结果变量是心理健康量表-5(MHI-5)的变化。效应修饰因素是一个多类别卫生和社会护理职业变量。使用随机效应和固定效应线性回归模型来分析个体间和个体内差异。对随时间变化的混杂因素进行了控制。我们发现了效应修饰的证据。与无工作压力源相比,护理人员和辅助人员在报告有3个或更多工作压力源时,MHI-5得分下降4.90分(95%置信区间为-6.23至-3.57)。这些工作者报告的心理健康水平也低于其他职业群体,并且更多地暴露于恶劣的心理社会工作环境中。卫生工作者在暴露于3个或更多工作压力源时,MHI-5得分也大幅下降(-3.50,95%置信区间为-5.05至-1.94)。了解这支劳动力队伍的就业质量,以及这种就业对心理健康的后续影响,对于确保个人、组织和与客户相关的可持续成果至关重要。