Soldavini Jessica, Berner Maureen, Da Silva Julia
Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention and Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7426, 1700 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426, United States of America.
School of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#3330, Knapp Sanders Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330, United States of America.
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Feb 25;14:100836. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100836. eCollection 2019 Jun.
The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of food insecurity and identify characteristics associated with food security status separately for undergraduate and graduate students. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 4819 students from a public flagship university in the Southeastern US. Students completed an online questionnaire assessing food security status over the past 12 months using the 10-item US Adult Food Security Survey Module and self-reported demographics and student characteristics. Data were collected in October and November of 2016. Analyses were stratified by student status (undergraduate or graduate). We calculated frequencies of food security status categories and used multinomial logistic regression to assess the association between food security status and student characteristics. Food insecurity rates were 25.2% for undergraduate and 17.8% for graduate students. Characteristics associated with food security status ( < .05) for undergraduates only were gender, year in school, receipt of financial aid, cooking frequency, perceived cooking skills, and having a meal plan. For graduate students only, characteristics included age, marital status, having dependent children, enrollment status, and body mass index. Characteristics associated with food security status across both groups included race/ethnicity, perceived health, international student, and employment status. While most prior studies of college food insecurity look only at undergraduate students or combine undergraduate and graduate students into one group, we found differences between undergraduate and graduate students. It is important to consider undergraduate and graduate students as two separate groups as strategies that would be most effective for addressing food insecurity may differ between them.
本研究的目的是分别估算本科生和研究生中粮食不安全的患病率,并确定与粮食安全状况相关的特征。我们对美国东南部一所公立旗舰大学的4819名学生进行了横断面分析。学生们完成了一份在线问卷,使用10项美国成人粮食安全调查模块评估过去12个月的粮食安全状况,并自行报告人口统计学和学生特征。数据于2016年10月和11月收集。分析按学生身份(本科或研究生)分层。我们计算了粮食安全状况类别的频率,并使用多项逻辑回归来评估粮食安全状况与学生特征之间的关联。本科生的粮食不安全率为25.2%,研究生为17.8%。仅与本科生粮食安全状况相关的特征(<0.05)包括性别、在校年级、获得经济援助、烹饪频率、感知烹饪技能以及是否有饮食计划。仅与研究生相关的特征包括年龄、婚姻状况、是否有受抚养子女、入学状态和体重指数。两组中与粮食安全状况相关的特征包括种族/民族、感知健康状况、国际学生身份和就业状况。虽然之前大多数关于大学生粮食不安全的研究只关注本科生,或将本科生和研究生合并为一组,但我们发现本科生和研究生之间存在差异。将本科生和研究生视为两个独立的群体很重要,因为解决粮食不安全问题最有效的策略在他们之间可能有所不同。