• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound in Dense and Nondense Breasts.在致密型和非致密型乳腺中使用数字乳腺断层合成和超声减少不必要的活检。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 4;29(8):5508-5516. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080435.
2
Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.致密型乳腺人群乳腺癌筛查中补充性筛查作为乳腺 X 线摄影的辅助手段:卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 19;23(9):1-293. eCollection 2023.
3
Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.与数字乳腺断层合成术相比,数字乳腺钼靶筛查与间隔期浸润性和高级别乳腺癌风险的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 14;327(22):2220-2230. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7672.
4
Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影在社区实践中对患者年龄、筛查轮次和乳腺密度的筛查性能比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11792.
5
Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Breast Density.基于乳腺密度的乳腺 X 线摄影、数字乳腺断层合成和磁共振成像在乳腺癌筛查中的应用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1;184(10):1222-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4224.
6
7
Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.在接受筛查的致密型乳腺女性中,比较用于乳腺癌检测的简化乳腺 MRI 与数字乳腺断层合成术。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):746-756. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0572.
8
The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.数字乳腺断层合成对英国乳腺筛查计划中召回女性良性活检率的潜在影响。
Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):310-317. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019180809. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
The ability of digital breast tomosynthesis to reduce additional examinations in older women.数字乳腺断层合成技术减少老年女性额外检查的能力。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 21;10:1276434. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1276434. eCollection 2023.
10
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts.数字化乳腺断层融合超声与数字化乳腺钼靶联合超声在致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查中的应用比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Apr;24(4):274-283. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0649.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Management Pathways for Workup of Abnormal Screening With Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.数字化乳腺钼靶摄影与数字化乳腺断层合成筛查异常的诊断管理路径
J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 Aug;22(8):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.04.008. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
Diagnostic Efficacy of Five Different Imaging Modalities in the Assessment of Women Recalled at Breast Screening-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.五种不同成像方式在乳腺筛查召回女性评估中的诊断效能——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3505. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203505.
3
Progress and Remaining Gaps in the Early Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌早期检测和治疗的进展及尚存差距。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 8;30(3):3201-3205. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030242.

本文引用的文献

1
Mimickers of breast malignancy: imaging findings, pathologic concordance and clinical management.乳腺恶性肿瘤的模仿者:影像学表现、病理一致性及临床管理
Insights Imaging. 2021 Apr 20;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-00991-x.
2
Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.在普通风险女性乳腺癌筛查中,将超声筛查加入数字乳腺钼靶和数字乳腺断层摄影。
Radiology. 2021 Mar;298(3):568-575. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203134. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Effect of Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of More than 8 Million Korean Women.数字乳腺 X 线摄影术用于乳腺癌筛查的效果:超过 800 万韩国女性的对比研究。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):247-255. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190951. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Mammographic Breast Density: Comparison Across Women with Conclusive and Inconclusive Mammography Reports.乳腺钼靶密度:乳腺钼靶检查报告明确和不明确的女性之间的比较
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2016 Mar;47(1):55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
5
The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.数字乳腺断层合成对英国乳腺筛查计划中召回女性良性活检率的潜在影响。
Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):310-317. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019180809. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
6
Stromal Fibrosis of the Breast: A Spectrum of Benign to Malignant Imaging Appearances.乳腺间质纤维化:从良性到恶性的一系列影像学表现
Radiol Res Pract. 2019 Feb 3;2019:5045908. doi: 10.1155/2019/5045908. eCollection 2019.
7
Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?乳腺钼靶密度:它如何影响筛查项目中的性能指标?
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan;110:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).前瞻性比较试验:在乳腺 X 线摄影阴性致密乳腺的女性中,附加断层合成或超声筛查(ASTOUND-2)。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Methodological Challenges and Updated Findings from a Meta-analysis of the Association between Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer.乳腺密度与乳腺癌相关性的荟萃分析中的方法学挑战和最新发现
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jan;28(1):22-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1175. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
10
Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone.乳腺摄影中的错误不能仅通过技术来解决。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):291-301. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.291.

在致密型和非致密型乳腺中使用数字乳腺断层合成和超声减少不必要的活检。

Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound in Dense and Nondense Breasts.

机构信息

Medical Image Optimisation and Perception Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.

Department of Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 4;29(8):5508-5516. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080435.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol29080435
PMID:36005173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9406307/
Abstract

Aim: To compare digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound in women recalled for assessment after a positive screening mammogram and assess the potential for each of these tools to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Methods: This data linkage study included 538 women recalled for assessment from January 2017 to December 2019. The association between the recalled mammographic abnormalities and breast density was analysed using the chi-square independence test. Relative risks and the number of recalled cases requiring DBT and ultrasound assessment to prevent one unnecessary biopsy were compared using the McNemar test. Results: Breast density significantly influenced recall decisions (p < 0.001). Ultrasound showed greater potential to decrease unnecessary biopsies than DBT: in entirely fatty (21% vs. 5%; p = 0.04); scattered fibroglandular (23% vs. 10%; p = 0.003); heterogeneously dense (34% vs. 7%; p < 0.001) and extremely dense (39% vs. 9%; p < 0.001) breasts. The number of benign cases needing assessment to prevent one unnecessary biopsy was significantly lower with ultrasound than DBT in heterogeneously dense (1.8 vs. 7; p < 0.001) and extremely dense (1.9 vs. 5.1; p = 0.03) breasts. Conclusion: Women with dense breasts are more likely to be recalled for assessment and have a false-positive biopsy. Women with dense breasts benefit more from ultrasound assessment than from DBT.

摘要

目的

比较数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)和超声在因阳性筛查乳房 X 光片而被召回评估的女性中的应用,并评估这两种工具减少不必要活检的潜力。

方法

本数据链接研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间因评估而被召回的 538 名女性。使用卡方独立性检验分析召回的乳房 X 光片异常与乳腺密度之间的关系。使用 McNemar 检验比较使用 DBT 和超声评估以预防一次不必要活检的召回病例的相对风险和数量。

结果

乳腺密度显著影响召回决策(p < 0.001)。与 DBT 相比,超声显示出更大的减少不必要活检的潜力:在完全脂肪(21%比 5%;p = 0.04)、散在纤维腺体(23%比 10%;p = 0.003)、不均匀致密(34%比 7%;p < 0.001)和极度致密(39%比 9%;p < 0.001)的乳房中。与 DBT 相比,在不均匀致密(1.8 比 7;p < 0.001)和极度致密(1.9 比 5.1;p = 0.03)的乳房中,需要评估的良性病例数量显著减少。

结论

乳腺致密的女性更有可能被召回评估,并且假阳性活检的可能性更高。乳腺致密的女性从超声评估中获益多于 DBT。