Dittrick J, Suchey J M
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986 May;70(1):3-9. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330700103.
A large sample (n = 370) of Central California prehistoric skeletal remains was analyzed for sexual dimorphism of long bones using nine femoral and nine humeral dimensions. Sex of all individuals was assessed using traits of the os pubis. Discriminant analysis was done separately for the robust Early Horizon sample and the Middle/Late Horizon sample. Use of multiple variables did not produce appreciably better results over the use of several of the best variables, analyzed singly. Attention is focused on measurements of maximum diameter femoral head, femoral bicondylar width, and diameter of the humeral head (transverse or vertical). These variables produce excellent separation of the sexes with about 90% accuracy for the Middle/Late Horizon sample. They have been overlooked in the recent literature in which the relative values of length versus midshaft dimensions are debated. The measurements found to be superior in this study are taken at the ends of the bones where durability of these regions is indicated by large sample sizes found in this study. We suggest workers redirect their focus from the midshaft to the ends of the long bones. The discriminant analyses presented here have greater accuracy than most claims for either long bone or cranial sex determination. These standards, based on two samples with differing robusticity, may have applicability for workers in other areas who lack large skeletal samples.
对来自加利福尼亚中部的370具史前骨骼遗骸的大样本进行了分析,利用九个股骨和九个肱骨尺寸来研究长骨的性别差异。通过耻骨特征评估所有个体的性别。分别对强健的早期样本和中/晚期样本进行判别分析。与单独分析几个最佳变量相比,使用多个变量并没有产生明显更好的结果。重点关注股骨头最大直径、股骨双髁宽度和肱骨头直径(横向或纵向)的测量。对于中/晚期样本,这些变量能以约90%的准确率实现出色的性别区分。在近期关于长度与骨干中部尺寸相对值存在争议的文献中,它们被忽视了。本研究中发现的这些 superior测量是在骨骼末端进行的,本研究中大量样本表明这些区域具有耐久性。我们建议研究人员将重点从中部骨干转移到长骨末端。这里呈现的判别分析比大多数关于长骨或颅骨性别判定的说法具有更高的准确率。基于两个不同强健程度样本的这些标准,可能适用于其他缺乏大量骨骼样本的研究人员。