UCL Faculty of Population Health Sciences, British Regional Heart Study Department of Primary Care & Population Health Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jul;73(7):645-651. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211719. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
It remains uncertain whether cystatin C is a superior marker of renal function than creatinine in older adults. We have investigated the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations based on creatinine (CKD-EPIcr) and cystatin C (CKD-EPIcys), and cardiovascular risk markers and mortality in older adults.
This is a cross-sectional and prospective study of 1639 British men aged 71-92 years followed up for an average of 5 years for mortality. Cox survival model and receiving operating characteristic analysis were used to assess the associations.
The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was similar using the two CKD-EPI equations, although cystatin C reclassified 43.9% of those with stage 3a CKD (eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73, moderate damage) to no CKD. However, CKD stages assessed using both CKD-EPIcr and CKD-EPIcys were significantly associated with vascular risk markers and with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. In all men with CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73), the HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors compared with those with no CKD were 1.53 (1.20 to 1.96) and 1.74 (1.35 to 2.23) using CKD-EPIcr and CKD-EPIcys, respectively. Comparisons of the two CKD equations showed no significant difference in their predictive ability for mortality (difference in area under the curve p=0.46).
Despite reclassification of CKD stages, assessment of CKD using CKD-EPIcys did not improve prediction of mortality in older British men >70 years. Our data do not support the routine use of CKD-EPIcys for identifying CKD in the elderly British male population.
胱抑素 C 是否优于肌酐作为老年人肾功能的标志物仍不确定。我们研究了基于肌酐的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)方程估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)(CKD-EPIcr)与胱抑素 C(CKD-EPIcys)之间的关系,以及心血管风险标志物与老年人的死亡率之间的关系。
这是一项对 1639 名年龄在 71-92 岁的英国男性进行的横断面和前瞻性研究,平均随访 5 年,以评估死亡率。使用 Cox 生存模型和接收者操作特征分析来评估相关性。
虽然胱抑素 C 将 43.9%的 3a 期 CKD(eGFR 45-59ml/min/1.73,中度损伤)重新分类为无 CKD,但两种 CKD-EPI 方程的 CKD 患病率相似。然而,使用 CKD-EPIcr 和 CKD-EPIcys 评估的 CKD 分期与血管风险标志物以及全因和心血管疾病死亡率显著相关。在所有患有 CKD(eGFR <60ml/min/1.73)的男性中,与无 CKD 相比,调整心血管危险因素后全因死亡率的 HR(95%CI)分别为 1.53(1.20 至 1.96)和 1.74(1.35 至 2.23),分别使用 CKD-EPIcr 和 CKD-EPIcys。两种 CKD 方程的比较显示,死亡率预测能力无显著差异(曲线下面积差异的 p=0.46)。
尽管 CKD 分期重新分类,但在 70 岁以上的英国老年男性中,使用 CKD-EPIcys 评估 CKD 并不能改善死亡率的预测。我们的数据不支持在英国老年男性人群中常规使用 CKD-EPIcys 来识别 CKD。