Suppr超能文献

慢性肾脏病、心血管风险标志物与老年男性的全因死亡率:胱抑素 C 与肌酐。

Chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular risk markers and total mortality in older men: cystatin C versus creatinine.

机构信息

UCL Faculty of Population Health Sciences, British Regional Heart Study Department of Primary Care & Population Health Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jul;73(7):645-651. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211719. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain whether cystatin C is a superior marker of renal function than creatinine in older adults. We have investigated the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations based on creatinine (CKD-EPIcr) and cystatin C (CKD-EPIcys), and cardiovascular risk markers and mortality in older adults.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional and prospective study of 1639 British men aged 71-92 years followed up for an average of 5 years for mortality. Cox survival model and receiving operating characteristic analysis were used to assess the associations.

RESULTS

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was similar using the two CKD-EPI equations, although cystatin C reclassified 43.9% of those with stage 3a CKD (eGFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73, moderate damage) to no CKD. However, CKD stages assessed using both CKD-EPIcr and CKD-EPIcys were significantly associated with vascular risk markers and with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. In all men with CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73), the HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors compared with those with no CKD were 1.53 (1.20 to 1.96) and 1.74 (1.35 to 2.23) using CKD-EPIcr and CKD-EPIcys, respectively. Comparisons of the two CKD equations showed no significant difference in their predictive ability for mortality (difference in area under the curve p=0.46).

CONCLUSION

Despite reclassification of CKD stages, assessment of CKD using CKD-EPIcys did not improve prediction of mortality in older British men >70 years. Our data do not support the routine use of CKD-EPIcys for identifying CKD in the elderly British male population.

摘要

背景

胱抑素 C 是否优于肌酐作为老年人肾功能的标志物仍不确定。我们研究了基于肌酐的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)方程估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)(CKD-EPIcr)与胱抑素 C(CKD-EPIcys)之间的关系,以及心血管风险标志物与老年人的死亡率之间的关系。

方法

这是一项对 1639 名年龄在 71-92 岁的英国男性进行的横断面和前瞻性研究,平均随访 5 年,以评估死亡率。使用 Cox 生存模型和接收者操作特征分析来评估相关性。

结果

虽然胱抑素 C 将 43.9%的 3a 期 CKD(eGFR 45-59ml/min/1.73,中度损伤)重新分类为无 CKD,但两种 CKD-EPI 方程的 CKD 患病率相似。然而,使用 CKD-EPIcr 和 CKD-EPIcys 评估的 CKD 分期与血管风险标志物以及全因和心血管疾病死亡率显著相关。在所有患有 CKD(eGFR <60ml/min/1.73)的男性中,与无 CKD 相比,调整心血管危险因素后全因死亡率的 HR(95%CI)分别为 1.53(1.20 至 1.96)和 1.74(1.35 至 2.23),分别使用 CKD-EPIcr 和 CKD-EPIcys。两种 CKD 方程的比较显示,死亡率预测能力无显著差异(曲线下面积差异的 p=0.46)。

结论

尽管 CKD 分期重新分类,但在 70 岁以上的英国老年男性中,使用 CKD-EPIcys 评估 CKD 并不能改善死亡率的预测。我们的数据不支持在英国老年男性人群中常规使用 CKD-EPIcys 来识别 CKD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验