Suppr超能文献

经蝶窦与经颅入路治疗鞍结节脑膜瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Transsphenoidal versus Transcranial Approach for Treatment of Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, China Pituitary Disease Registry Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 19;9(1):4882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41292-0.

Abstract

There is controversy regarding the surgical route selection for tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs): the transsphenoidal (TS) or transcranial (TC) approach? We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes and postoperative complications between two surgical approaches. Literature search was performed. Relevant articles were selected and evaluated. Data were extracted and analyzed. Eight articles comprising 550 patients met the inclusion criteria. Traditionally, the rates of gross total resection, tumor recurrence, visual improvement, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage were the most common outcomes of interest. We demonstrated that the TS approach was significantly associated with better visual outcomes but more frequent cerebrospinal fluid leakage, while the rates of tumor resection and recurrence showed no significant difference between groups. In addition to surgical results that were consistent with previous studies, we further evaluated the impact of approach selection on common postoperative complications, which were closely related to the recovery course and quality of life. We revealed that the risk of dysosmia was significantly higher in the TS group. There was no significant difference between groups regarding infection, intracranial hemorrhage, and endocrine disorders. Because of the relatively low evidence levels of included retrospective studies, it was difficult to reach a categorical conclusion about the optimal surgical approach for TSMs. Finally, we recommended that the TS approach was an alternative option in patients with smaller TSMs (<30 mm) and limited invasion of optic canals in experienced neurosurgical centers.

摘要

关于鞍结节脑膜瘤(TSMs)的手术入路选择存在争议:经蝶窦(TS)还是经颅(TC)入路?我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较两种手术入路的临床结果和术后并发症。进行文献检索。选择并评估相关文章。提取和分析数据。符合纳入标准的 8 篇文章共 550 例患者。传统上,全切率、肿瘤复发、视力改善和脑脊液漏是最常见的关注结局。我们表明,TS 入路与更好的视力结果显著相关,但脑脊液漏更频繁,而肿瘤切除率和复发率在两组之间无显著差异。除了与先前研究一致的手术结果外,我们还进一步评估了入路选择对常见术后并发症的影响,这些并发症与恢复过程和生活质量密切相关。我们发现 TS 组的嗅觉障碍风险明显更高。两组在感染、颅内出血和内分泌紊乱方面无显著差异。由于纳入的回顾性研究证据水平相对较低,因此很难对 TSMs 的最佳手术入路得出明确的结论。最后,我们建议在经验丰富的神经外科中心,对于较小的 TSMs(<30mm)和视神经管有限侵犯的患者,TS 入路是一种替代选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aedd/6424979/ba877cff708a/41598_2019_41292_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验