• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓冲违背:审视单位氛围水平、强度与心理契约违背之间的三方互动

Buffering the Breach: Examining the Three-Way Interaction Between Unit Climate Level, Strength, and Psychological Contract Breach.

作者信息

Akkermans Jos, Bal P Matthijs, De Jong Simon B

机构信息

School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 5;10:473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00473. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00473
PMID:30890989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6411823/
Abstract

Despite the wealth of research showing that psychological contract breach (PCB) has negative outcomes for individuals, knowledge about the influence of the social context in which breaches are experienced is still scarce. This is surprising, as scholars have argued that work climates, such as when unit members are generally highly committed, could buffer an individual's negative experiences at work. Yet, to date, the unit climate and PCB literatures have largely remained separated and our main goal is to integrate these fields. This is especially timely and relevant, because recent work in the unit climate literature indicates that merely looking at the average climate might not be enough, because the climate's (i.e., the agreement or homogeneity within the unit) could also provide important social cues. Building on these recent advances, we develop and test a theoretical framework which links both climate concepts to PCB. More specifically, we hypothesized that especially when all unit members are highly homogeneously committed, an employee would reframe their PCB in such a way that it would less adversely affect work engagement and turnover intentions. Using data from 1,272 employees across 36 healthcare units, multilevel structural path analyses supported this three-way interaction. By answering recent calls for more "social PCB research" and integrating the unit climate and PCB literatures, we aim to provide guidance to scholars and practitioners who want to understand in more depth the social context's influence on PCB.

摘要

尽管大量研究表明心理契约违背(PCB)会给个体带来负面结果,但对于个体经历心理契约违背时所处社会环境的影响,我们仍知之甚少。这令人惊讶,因为学者们认为,诸如单位成员普遍高度投入的工作氛围,可能会缓冲个体在工作中的负面体验。然而,到目前为止,单位氛围和心理契约违背的文献在很大程度上仍相互分离,而我们的主要目标是整合这些领域。这一点尤为及时且具有相关性,因为单位氛围文献中的近期研究表明,仅仅考察平均氛围可能并不够,因为氛围的一致性(即单位内部的共识或同质性)也可能提供重要的社会线索。基于这些最新进展,我们开发并检验了一个将两种氛围概念与心理契约违背联系起来的理论框架。更具体地说,我们假设,尤其是当所有单位成员都高度且同质投入时,员工会以一种对工作投入和离职意图产生较小负面影响的方式重新诠释他们的心理契约违背。通过使用来自36个医疗单位的1272名员工的数据,多层次结构路径分析支持了这种三方交互作用。通过回应近期对更多“社会心理契约违背研究”的呼吁,并整合单位氛围和心理契约违背的文献,我们旨在为那些希望更深入理解社会环境对心理契约违背影响的学者和从业者提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86d/6411823/2bd4ab8837af/fpsyg-10-00473-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86d/6411823/685537cefd9f/fpsyg-10-00473-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86d/6411823/23d1b198db3d/fpsyg-10-00473-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86d/6411823/2bd4ab8837af/fpsyg-10-00473-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86d/6411823/685537cefd9f/fpsyg-10-00473-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86d/6411823/23d1b198db3d/fpsyg-10-00473-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86d/6411823/2bd4ab8837af/fpsyg-10-00473-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Buffering the Breach: Examining the Three-Way Interaction Between Unit Climate Level, Strength, and Psychological Contract Breach.缓冲违背:审视单位氛围水平、强度与心理契约违背之间的三方互动
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 5;10:473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00473. eCollection 2019.
2
Work Group Climate and Behavioral Responses to Psychological Contract Breach.工作团队氛围与对心理契约违背的行为反应。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 1;10:67. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00067. eCollection 2019.
3
Examining how different social account timings influence stress resolution in the aftermath of a psychological contract breach.探讨不同的社交账号发布时间如何影响心理契约破裂后压力的缓解。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 20;12(1):22021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25728-8.
4
The straw that broke the nurse's back-Using psychological contract breach to understand why nurses leave.压垮护士的最后一根稻草——用心理契约破裂来理解护士离职的原因。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Dec;80(12):4989-5002. doi: 10.1111/jan.16143. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
5
A structural equation model of the impacts of nurses' psychological safety and psychological contract breach.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1323-1331. doi: 10.1111/jan.16331. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
6
The Relationship Between Psychological Contract Breach and Employees' Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Cynicism and Work Alienation.心理契约违背与员工反生产工作行为之间的关系:组织犬儒主义和工作疏离感的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 27;9:1273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01273. eCollection 2018.
7
Psychological contract breach and job performance of new generation of employees: Considering the mediating effect of job burnout and the moderating effect of past breach experience.心理契约违背与新生代员工的工作绩效:基于工作倦怠的中介作用和过往违背经历的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 9;13:985604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985604. eCollection 2022.
8
Impact of psychological contract breach on firm's innovative performance: A moderated mediation model.心理契约违背对企业创新绩效的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 24;13:970622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970622. eCollection 2022.
9
Outcomes associated with breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract of safety.与安全心理契约违背和履行相关的结果。
J Safety Res. 2013 Dec;47:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
How psychological contract breach affects long-term mental and physical health: the longitudinal role of effort-reward imbalance.心理契约违背如何影响长期的心理和身体健康:努力-回报失衡的纵向作用。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2021 May;13(2):263-281. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12246. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Construct of Job Insecurity at Multiple Levels: Implications for Its Conceptualization and Theory Development.多层次工作不安全感的构建:对其概念化和理论发展的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3052. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043052.

本文引用的文献

1
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
2
Nonlinear effects of team tenure on team psychological safety climate and climate strength: Implications for average team member performance.团队任期对团队心理安全氛围和氛围强度的非线性影响:对平均团队成员绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jul;101(7):940-57. doi: 10.1037/apl0000097. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
3
Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
心理学研究中的复制:它们真的经常发生吗?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):537-42. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460688.
4
Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test.将工作要求和资源与员工敬业度和倦怠联系起来:理论扩展和元分析检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):834-48. doi: 10.1037/a0019364.
5
Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers.探索变革型领导对下属的双重影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Nov;95(6):1134-44. doi: 10.1037/a0020754.
6
Human resource configurations: investigating fit with the organizational context.
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jul;93(4):864-82. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.864.
7
Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.测量不变性检验中替代拟合指数的功效与敏感性。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 May;93(3):568-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568.
8
Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis.挑战性压力源与阻碍性压力源与工作态度、离职意图、离职及退缩行为的差异关系:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):438-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438.
9
Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model.社会支持来源与倦怠:资源守恒模型的元分析检验
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1134-45. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134.
10
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.