文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

移动医疗系统在社区基础医疗中的应用:控制措施的识别与隐私威胁的缓解。

Mobile Health Systems for Community-Based Primary Care: Identifying Controls and Mitigating Privacy Threats.

机构信息

Privacy and Security (PriSec), Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

School of Informatics, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 20;7(3):e11642. doi: 10.2196/11642.


DOI:10.2196/11642
PMID:30892275
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6446152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-based primary care focuses on health promotion, awareness raising, and illnesses treatment and prevention in individuals, groups, and communities. Community Health Workers (CHWs) are the leading actors in such programs, helping to bridge the gap between the population and the health system. Many mobile health (mHealth) initiatives have been undertaken to empower CHWs and improve the data collection process in the primary care, replacing archaic paper-based approaches. A special category of mHealth apps, known as mHealth Data Collection Systems (MDCSs), is often used for such tasks. These systems process highly sensitive personal health data of entire communities so that a careful consideration about privacy is paramount for any successful deployment. However, the mHealth literature still lacks methodologically rigorous analyses for privacy and data protection. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for MDCSs is presented, providing a systematic identification and evaluation of potential privacy risks, particularly emphasizing controls and mitigation strategies to handle negative privacy impacts. METHODS: The privacy analysis follows a systematic methodology for PIAs. As a case study, we adopt the GeoHealth system, a large-scale MDCS used by CHWs in the Family Health Strategy, the Brazilian program for delivering community-based primary care. All the PIA steps were taken on the basis of discussions among the researchers (privacy and security experts). The identification of threats and controls was decided particularly on the basis of literature reviews and working group meetings among the group. Moreover, we also received feedback from specialists in primary care and software developers of other similar MDCSs in Brazil. RESULTS: The GeoHealth PIA is based on 8 Privacy Principles and 26 Privacy Targets derived from the European General Data Protection Regulation. Associated with that, 22 threat groups with a total of 97 subthreats and 41 recommended controls were identified. Among the main findings, we observed that privacy principles can be enhanced on existing MDCSs with controls for managing consent, transparency, intervenability, and data minimization. CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been significant research that deals with data security issues, attention to privacy in its multiple dimensions is still lacking for MDCSs in general. New systems have the opportunity to incorporate privacy and data protection by design. Existing systems will have to address their privacy issues to comply with new and upcoming data protection regulations. However, further research is still needed to identify feasible and cost-effective solutions.

摘要

背景:以社区为基础的初级保健工作重点是促进个人、群体和社区的健康,提高认识,并治疗和预防疾病。社区卫生工作者(CHWs)是此类计划的主要执行者,有助于弥合民众与卫生系统之间的差距。许多移动医疗(mHealth)举措已经开展,旨在增强 CHWs 的能力,并改善初级保健的数据收集过程,取代过时的纸质方法。一类特殊的移动医疗应用程序,称为移动医疗数据采集系统(MDCSs),通常用于此类任务。这些系统处理整个社区的高度敏感的个人健康数据,因此,任何成功的部署都必须非常重视隐私问题。然而,移动医疗文献仍然缺乏关于隐私和数据保护的严格方法分析。

目的:本文提出了 MDCS 的隐私影响评估(PIA),系统地识别和评估潜在的隐私风险,特别强调控制和缓解策略,以处理负面隐私影响。

方法:隐私分析遵循 PIA 的系统方法。作为案例研究,我们采用了 GeoHealth 系统,这是一种大型 MDCS,被家庭健康战略中的 CHWs 使用,该战略是提供以社区为基础的初级保健的巴西计划。所有 PIA 步骤都是在研究人员(隐私和安全专家)之间的讨论基础上进行的。威胁和控制的识别特别基于文献综述和工作组会议。此外,我们还收到了初级保健专家和巴西其他类似 MDCS 软件开发人员的反馈。

结果:GeoHealth PIA 基于源自欧盟通用数据保护条例的 8 个隐私原则和 26 个隐私目标。与此相关的是,确定了 22 个威胁组,共 97 个子威胁和 41 个建议控制措施。主要发现包括,我们观察到,可以通过管理同意、透明度、可干预性和数据最小化等控制措施,在现有 MDCS 上增强隐私原则。

结论:尽管已经有大量研究涉及数据安全问题,但一般来说,移动医疗数据采集系统在多个方面的隐私问题仍未得到足够重视。新系统有机会通过设计纳入隐私和数据保护。现有的系统将不得不解决其隐私问题,以遵守新的和即将出台的数据保护法规。然而,仍需要进一步研究以确定可行且具有成本效益的解决方案。

相似文献

[1]
Mobile Health Systems for Community-Based Primary Care: Identifying Controls and Mitigating Privacy Threats.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-3-20

[2]
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-4-16

[3]
Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations.

J Med Syst. 2015-1

[4]
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024-5-22

[5]
Patients' Perspectives on the Data Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-5-31

[6]
Critical Criteria and Countermeasures for Mobile Health Developers to Ensure Mobile Health Privacy and Security: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023-3-2

[7]
An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Approach for Assessing Privacy Protection in mHealth Systems.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018-10-8

[8]
Sensor-Based mHealth Authentication for Real-Time Remote Healthcare Monitoring System: A Multilayer Systematic Review.

J Med Syst. 2019-1-6

[9]
E-Consent for Data Privacy: Consent Management for Mobile Health Technologies in Public Health Surveys and Disease Surveillance.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019-8-21

[10]
Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis.

BMJ. 2019-3-20

引用本文的文献

[1]
Artificial Intelligence-Based Ethical Hacking for Health Information Systems: Simulation Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-4-25

[2]
Critical Criteria and Countermeasures for Mobile Health Developers to Ensure Mobile Health Privacy and Security: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023-3-2

[3]
On the privacy of mental health apps: An empirical investigation and its implications for app development.

Empir Softw Eng. 2023

[4]
A new privacy framework for the management of chronic diseases via mHealth in a post-Covid-19 world.

Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022

本文引用的文献

[1]
Computer security for data collection technologies.

Dev Eng. 2018

[2]
Perspectives and experiences of community health workers in Brazilian primary care centers using m-health tools in home visits with community members.

Hum Resour Health. 2017-9-29

[3]
Mobile Technology for Community Health in Ghana: what happens when technical functionality threatens the effectiveness of digital health programs?

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017-3-14

[4]
Georeferenced and secure mobile health system for large scale data collection in primary care.

Int J Med Inform. 2016-10

[5]
Cancer patients' attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: A qualitative study.

Health Informatics J. 2016-7-19

[6]
Brazil's family health strategy--delivering community-based primary care in a universal health system.

N Engl J Med. 2015-6-4

[7]
SecourHealth: a delay-tolerant security framework for mobile health data collection.

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014-4-24

[8]
Mobile health in emerging countries: a survey of research initiatives in Brazil.

Int J Med Inform. 2013-2-12

[9]
Privacy by Design at Population Data BC: a case study describing the technical, administrative, and physical controls for privacy-sensitive secondary use of personal information for research in the public interest.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012-8-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索