LeFevre Amnesty E, Mohan Diwakar, Hutchful David, Jennings Larissa, Mehl Garrett, Labrique Alain, Romano Karen, Moorthy Anitha
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Global mHealth Initiative, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0421-9.
Despite the growing use of technology in the health sector, little evidence is available on the technological performance of mobile health programs nor on the willingness of target users to utilize these technologies as intended (behavioral performance). In this case study of the Mobile Technology for Health (MOTECH) program in Ghana, we assess the platform's effectiveness in delivering messages, along with user response across sites in five districts from 2011 to 2014.
MOTECH is comprised of "Client Data Application" (CDA) which allows providers to digitize and track service delivery information for women and infants and "Mobile Midwife" (MM) which sends automated educational voice messages to the mobile phones of pregnant and postpartum women. Using a naturalist study design, we draw upon system generated data to evaluate message delivery, client engagement, and provider responsiveness to MOTECH over time and by level of facility.
A total of 7,370 women were enrolled in MM during pregnancy and 14,867 women were enrolled postpa1rtum. While providers were able to register and upload patient-level health information using CDA, the majority of these uploads occurred in Community-based facilities versus Health Centers. For MM, 25% or less of expected messages were received by pregnant women, despite the majority (>77%) owning a private mobile phone. While over 80% of messages received by pregnant women were listened to, postpartum rates of listening declined over time. Only 25% of pregnant women received and listened to at least 1 first trimester message. By 6-12 months postpartum, less than 6% of enrolled women were exposed to at least one message.
Caution should be exercised in assuming that digital health programs perform as intended. Evaluations should measure the technological, behavioral, health systems, and/or community factors which may lead to breaks in the impact pathway and influence findings on effectiveness. The MOTECH platform's technological limitations in 'pushing' out voice messages highlights the need for more timely use of data to mitigate delivery challenges and improve exposure to health information. Alternative message delivery channels (USSD or SMS) could improve the platform's ability to deliver messages but may not be appropriate for illiterate users.
Not applicable.
尽管技术在卫生领域的应用日益广泛,但关于移动健康项目的技术性能以及目标用户按预期使用这些技术的意愿(行为表现)的证据却很少。在这项关于加纳移动健康技术(MOTECH)项目的案例研究中,我们评估了该平台在传递信息方面的有效性,以及2011年至2014年期间五个地区各站点的用户反应。
MOTECH由“客户数据应用程序”(CDA)和“移动助产士”(MM)组成。CDA使提供者能够将妇女和婴儿的服务提供信息数字化并进行跟踪,MM则向孕妇和产后妇女的手机发送自动教育语音信息。我们采用自然主义研究设计,利用系统生成的数据来评估信息传递、客户参与度以及随着时间推移和设施水平变化提供者对MOTECH的响应情况。
共有7370名妇女在孕期登记使用MM,14867名妇女在产后登记使用。虽然提供者能够使用CDA注册并上传患者级别的健康信息,但这些上传大多发生在社区设施而非健康中心。对于MM,尽管大多数孕妇(>77%)拥有私人手机,但只有25%或更少的预期信息被孕妇接收。虽然孕妇收到的信息中超过80%被收听,但产后收听率随时间下降。只有25%的孕妇接收并收听了至少一条孕早期信息。到产后6 - 12个月时,登记使用的妇女中不到6%至少收到过一条信息。
在假设数字健康项目能按预期运行时应谨慎。评估应衡量可能导致影响路径中断并影响有效性结果的技术、行为健康系统和/或社区因素。MOTECH平台在“推送”语音信息方面的技术限制凸显了更及时利用数据以缓解传递挑战并增加健康信息曝光的必要性。替代信息传递渠道(USSD或短信)可能会提高平台传递信息的能力,但可能不适用于文盲用户。
不适用。