Foot and Ankle Research and Innovation Lab, Massachusetts General Hospital, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):539-546. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00346.
Currently, there is insufficient knowledge about the benefits of anticoagulant use for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its inherent risk of bleeding adverse events in patients undergoing surgery distal to the knee.
The study included patients who had undergone an orthopaedic procedure distal to the tibial articular surface when they were 18 years of age or older. Using retrospective information from a tertiary care referral center, we compared patient demographics, clinical findings, diagnostic reports, procedures performed, and the rate of symptomatic VTE and bleeding adverse events between patients who had and those who had not received anticoagulant prophylaxis. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias due to prophylactic treatment allocation.
A total of 5,286 patients who had received anticoagulant prophylaxis for below-the-knee surgery were successfully matched with 5,286 patients who had not received anticoagulant prophylaxis for such surgery. After propensity score matching, the standardized difference between the groups was <0.1 for all baseline characteristics, indicating a negligible difference between the groups. Patients who received anticoagulant prophylaxis had a significantly lower risk of developing a VTE compared with patients who did not (39 patients [0.7%] versus 99 patients [1.9%]), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.56; p < 0.001). In contradistinction, patients who received anticoagulant prophylaxis had a significantly higher risk of developing a bleeding adverse event than those who did not (115 [2.2%] versus 55 [1.0%]; OR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.55 to 3.09]; p < 0.001).
Anticoagulant prophylaxis reduced the risk of VTE after surgery distal to the tibial articular surface by 3-fold but resulted in a concomitant 2-fold increase in the risk of a bleeding adverse event. Large-scale, prospective studies are necessary to better understand the true incidence of such events, associated patient-specific risk factors, efficacy of various thromboprophylactic regimens, and patient-reported implications of such events.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
目前,对于膝关节以下手术的患者,抗凝治疗在预防静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)方面的益处及其出血不良事件的固有风险知之甚少。
本研究纳入了 18 岁及以上接受胫骨关节面以下骨科手术的患者。研究人员利用来自三级转诊中心的回顾性信息,比较了接受和未接受抗凝预防治疗的患者的人口统计学特征、临床发现、诊断报告、手术操作以及症状性 VTE 和出血不良事件的发生率。采用倾向评分匹配来最小化因预防性治疗分配而导致的选择偏倚。
共有 5286 例接受膝关节以下手术抗凝预防治疗的患者与 5286 例未接受抗凝预防治疗的患者成功匹配。经过倾向评分匹配后,两组间所有基线特征的标准化差异均<0.1,表明两组间差异可忽略不计。与未接受抗凝预防治疗的患者相比,接受抗凝预防治疗的患者发生 VTE 的风险显著降低(39 例[0.7%] vs 99 例[1.9%]),优势比(OR)为 0.38(95%置信区间[CI],0.25 至 0.56;p<0.001)。相反,接受抗凝预防治疗的患者发生出血不良事件的风险显著高于未接受抗凝预防治疗的患者(115 例[2.2%] vs 55 例[1.0%]),OR 为 2.18(95% CI,1.55 至 3.09;p<0.001)。
抗凝预防治疗可使膝关节以下手术后 VTE 的风险降低 3 倍,但同时使出血不良事件的风险增加 2 倍。需要开展大规模的前瞻性研究,以更好地了解此类事件的真实发生率、相关患者特定风险因素、各种血栓预防方案的疗效以及此类事件对患者的影响。
治疗性研究 III 级。详见《作者须知》,以获取完整的证据等级描述。