Terapia Intensiva Neonatale, Dipartimento Integrato Materno-Infantile, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Modena, Italy.
Medico in formazione, Scuola di Specializzazione in Pediatria, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio, Modena, Italy.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0212784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212784. eCollection 2019.
International guidelines lack a substantial consensus regarding management of asymptomatic full-term and late preterm neonates at risk for early-onset disease (EOS). Large cohorts of newborns are suitable to increase the understanding of the safety and efficacy of a given strategy.
This is a prospective, area-based, cohort study involving regional birth facilities of Emilia-Romagna (Italy). We compared cases of EOS (at or above 35 weeks' gestation) registered in 2003-2009 (baseline period: 266,646 LBs) and in 2010-2016, after introduction of a new strategy (serial physical examinations, SPEs) for managing asymptomatic neonates at risk for EOS (intervention period: 265,508 LBs).
There were 108 cases of EOS (baseline period, n = 60; intervention period, n = 48). Twenty-two (20.4%) remained asymptomatic through the first 72 hours of life, whereas 86 (79.6%) developed symptoms, in most cases (52/86, 60.5%) at birth or within 6 hours. The median age at presentation was significantly earlier in the intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP)-exposed than in the IAP-unexposed neonates (0 hours, IQR 0.0000-0.0000 vs 6 hours, IQR 0.0000-15.0000, p<0.001). High number of neonates (n = 531) asymptomatic at birth, exposed to intrapartum fever, should be treated empirically for each newborn who subsequently develops sepsis. IAP exposed neonates increased (12% vs 33%, p = 0.01), age at presentation decreased (median 6 vs 1 hours, p = 0.01), whereas meningitis, mechanical ventilation and mortality did not change in baseline vs intervention period. After implementing the SPEs, no cases had adverse outcomes due to the strategy, and no cases developed severe disease after 6 hours of life.
Infants with EOS exposed to IAP developed symptoms at birth in almost all cases, and those who appeared well at birth had a very low chance of having EOS. The risk of EOS in neonates (asymptomatic at birth) exposed to intrapartum fever was low. Although definite conclusions on causation are lacking, our data support SPEs of asymptomatic newborns at risk for EOS. SPEs seems a safe and effective alternative to laboratory screening and empirical antibiotic therapy.
国际指南在处理有发生早发型疾病(EOS)风险的无症状足月和晚期早产儿方面缺乏实质性共识。大量新生儿队列适合提高对特定策略的安全性和有效性的理解。
这是一项涉及艾米利亚-罗马涅地区(意大利)区域分娩设施的前瞻性、基于区域的队列研究。我们比较了 2003-2009 年(基线期:266646 磅)和 2010-2016 年(干预期:265508 磅)登记的 EOS 病例(35 周以上的胎龄),引入了一种新的策略(连续体格检查,SPEs)来管理有 EOS 风险的无症状新生儿。
EOS 患儿 108 例(基线期 60 例,干预期 48 例)。22 例(20.4%)在生命的前 72 小时仍无症状,而 86 例(79.6%)出现症状,其中大多数(52/86,60.5%)在出生时或 6 小时内出现症状。在接受产时抗生素预防(IAP)的新生儿中,与未接受 IAP 的新生儿相比,中位出现时间显著更早(0 小时,IQR 0.0000-0.0000 与 6 小时,IQR 0.0000-15.0000,p<0.001)。有大量(n=531)出生时无症状、发热的新生儿,对于随后发生败血症的新生儿,均应进行经验性治疗。暴露于 IAP 的新生儿数量增加(12%比 33%,p=0.01),出现时间缩短(中位数 6 小时比 1 小时,p=0.01),而基线期和干预期的脑膜炎、机械通气和死亡率无变化。在实施 SPEs 后,该策略没有导致任何不良后果,且没有病例在出生后 6 小时后发生严重疾病。
暴露于 IAP 的 EOS 患儿几乎都在出生时出现症状,而出生时表现良好的患儿发生 EOS 的可能性非常低。发热的产时暴露的新生儿(无症状)发生 EOS 的风险较低。尽管缺乏因果关系的确切结论,但我们的数据支持对有 EOS 风险的无症状新生儿进行 SPEs。SPEs 似乎是实验室筛查和经验性抗生素治疗的安全有效的替代方法。