Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉剂注射治疗头颈部肌筋膜疼痛综合征的短期疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Local Anesthetic Injections for the Short-Term Treatment of Head and Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

出版信息

J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019 Spring;33(2):183–198. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2277. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of local anesthetic trigger point injections in adults with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the head, neck, and shoulder regions compared to dry needling, placebo, and other interventions.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials using local anesthetic injections in adults diagnosed with MPS were included. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE libraries were searched. The primary outcome was pain measured with a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included pain threshold, range of cervical motion, depression scale, and pressure pain intensity (PPI) score. Risk of bias was analyzed based on Cochrane's handbook.

RESULTS

The initial search strategy yielded 324 unduplicated references up to April 1, 2018. A total of 15 RCTs were included, with 884 adult patients diagnosed with MPS. Meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in VAS pain scale of 1.585 units at 1 to 4 weeks in the local anesthetic group compared to the dry needling group (95% confidence interval -2.926 to -.245; P = .020). However, when only including double-blinded studies, the effect was not statistically significant (P = .331). There was also a significant improvement in pain of 0.767 units with local anesthetic at 2 to 8 weeks compared to placebo (95% confidence interval -1.324 to -0.210; P = .007). No statistically significant differences were found in other secondary outcomes between local anesthetic and all other interventions.

CONCLUSION

Though local anesthetics provided a significant improvement in pain compared to dry needling, evidence was of low quality, and sensitivity analyses including only double-blinded studies provided no statistically significant difference. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

评估在头、颈和肩部肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)成人患者中,局部麻醉触发点注射与干针、安慰剂和其他干预措施相比的有效性。

方法

纳入使用局部麻醉注射治疗成人 MPS 的随机对照试验。检索 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed 中的 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 EMBASE 数据库。主要结局为使用 0 到 10 的视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的疼痛。次要结局包括疼痛阈值、颈椎运动范围、抑郁量表和压力疼痛强度(PPI)评分。基于 Cochrane 手册分析偏倚风险。

结果

最初的搜索策略产生了 324 篇截至 2018 年 4 月 1 日的无重复参考文献。共纳入 15 项 RCT,涉及 884 名成人 MPS 患者。Meta 分析显示,与干针组相比,局部麻醉组在 1 到 4 周时 VAS 疼痛评分显著改善 1.585 单位(95%置信区间-2.926 至-.245;P=0.020)。然而,当仅纳入双盲研究时,效果无统计学意义(P=0.331)。与安慰剂相比,局部麻醉在 2 到 8 周时疼痛也显著改善 0.767 单位(95%置信区间-1.324 至-.020;P=0.007)。局部麻醉与所有其他干预措施相比,其他次要结局均无统计学差异。

结论

尽管与干针相比,局部麻醉在疼痛方面有显著改善,但证据质量较低,包括仅双盲研究的敏感性分析无统计学差异。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验