Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Mar 20;27(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0611-9.
People experiencing a mental health crisis receive variable and poorer quality care than those experiencing a physical health crisis. Little is known about the epidemiology, subsequent care pathways of mental health and self-harm emergencies attended by ambulance services, and subsequent all-cause mortality, including deaths by suicide. This is the first national epidemiological analysis of the processes and outcomes of people attended by an ambulance due to a mental health or self-harm emergency. The study aimed to describe patient characteristics, volume, case-mix, outcomes and care pathways following ambulance attendance in this patient population.
A linked data study of Scottish ambulance service, emergency department, acute inpatient and death records for adults aged ≥16 for one full year following index ambulance attendance in 2011.
The ambulance service attended 6802 mental health or self harm coded patients on 9014 occasions. This represents 11% of all calls attended that year. Various pathways resulted from these attendances. Most frequent were those that resulted in transportation to and discharge from the emergency department (n = 4566/9014; 51%). Some patients were left at home (n = 1003/9014 attendances, 11%). Others were admitted to hospital (n = 2043/9014, 23%). Within 12 months of initial attendance, 279 (4%) patients had died, 97 of these were recorded as suicide.
This unique study finds that ambulance service and emergency departments are missing opportunities to provide better care to this population and in potentially avoidable mortality, morbidity and service burden. Developing and testing interventions for this patient group in pre-hospital and emergency department settings could lead to reductions in suicide, patient distress, and service usage.
经历心理健康危机的人所接受的护理质量不如经历身体健康危机的人。对于那些因心理健康或自残紧急情况而由救护车服务照顾的人,以及随后的全因死亡率,包括自杀死亡,其流行病学、后续护理途径知之甚少。这是首次对因心理健康或自残紧急情况而由救护车服务照顾的人的处理过程和结果进行的全国性流行病学分析。本研究旨在描述患者特征、数量、病例组合、结果以及该人群在救护车服务照顾后的护理途径。
对苏格兰救护车服务、急诊部、急性住院和死亡记录进行了一项链接数据研究,对象为 2011 年在索引救护车服务照顾后的一整年中年龄≥16 岁的成年人。
救护车服务在 9014 次就诊中照顾了 6802 名心理健康或自残编码患者。这占当年所有就诊的 11%。这些就诊导致了各种途径。最常见的是那些导致从急诊部转运和出院的途径(n=4566/9014;51%)。一些患者被留在家里(n=1003/9014 次就诊,11%)。其他人则被收治住院(n=2043/9014,23%)。在初次就诊后的 12 个月内,有 279 名(4%)患者死亡,其中 97 人被记录为自杀。
这项独特的研究发现,救护车服务和急诊部错过了为这一人群提供更好护理的机会,从而导致了潜在可避免的死亡率、发病率和服务负担。在院前和急诊部环境中为这一患者群体开发和测试干预措施可能会降低自杀率、患者痛苦和服务使用。