• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于活动的成本分析:将对比增强超声(CEUS)纳入经腹部超声检测到的局灶性胰腺病变的诊断路径中。

Activity-Based Cost Analysis of Including Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Diagnostic Pathway of Focal Pancreatic Lesions Detected by Abdominal Ultrasound.

机构信息

Radiology, University of Verona, Italy.

Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.

出版信息

Ultraschall Med. 2019 Oct;40(5):618-624. doi: 10.1055/a-0869-7861. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1055/a-0869-7861
PMID:30895585
Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform an activity-based cost analysis of the inclusion of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnostic pathway of newly detected focal pancreatic lesions revealed by abdominal ultrasound (US) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 14-year period, 977 patients with newly detected focal pancreatic lesions on US and subsequently studied with CEUS and/or CT and MRI were included. The cost of equipment, materials and human resources for every imaging method was calculated. We analyzed the costs in different scenarios considering whether or not CT or MRI was required in the diagnostic pathway. The savings (R) were calculated by subtracting the differential cost of CEUS from the eliminated third-level exam (CCEUS: CEUS cost; CCT: CT cost; CMRI: MRI cost) compared to conventional ultrasound (CCEUS-CUS): R = CCT-(CCEUS-CUS) or R = CMRI-(CCEUS-CUS).

RESULTS

Total costs were: US 28.39 €; CEUS 70.50 €; CT 106.23 €; MRI 219.61 €. In 388/563 patients CEUS characterized the pancreatic lesion as solid, with only CT being performed as a second-level investigation: the savings were 68 870.36 €. In 266/414 patients CEUS diagnosed lesions as cystic, with only MRI being performed as a second-level examination: the savings were 16 825.07 €. Considering the whole diagnostic pathway of the patients, the cost savings were 76 809.35 € for solid lesions and 26 242.49 € for cystic lesions, with overall savings of 103 051.84 €.

CONCLUSION

CEUS represents a cost-effective imaging method for the differentiation of focal pancreatic lesions and could guide the selection of the best imaging modality for preoperative assessment, thereby optimizing resources and securing the diagnostic pathway.

摘要

目的

对经腹部超声(US)新发现的局灶性胰腺病变进行对比增强超声(CEUS)检查的诊断路径与计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)进行基于活动的成本分析。

材料和方法

在 14 年期间,纳入了 977 例经 US 新发现的局灶性胰腺病变的患者,这些患者随后进行了 CEUS 及/或 CT 和 MRI 检查。计算了每种成像方法的设备、材料和人力资源成本。我们分析了不同情况下的成本,考虑了诊断路径中是否需要 CT 或 MRI。将 CEUS 的成本与消除的第三级检查(CCEUS:CEUS 成本;CCT:CT 成本;CMRI:MRI 成本)之间的差异成本相减,计算出节约额(R)(CCEUS-CUS):R= CCT-(CCEUS-CUS)或 R=CMRI-(CCEUS-CUS)。

结果

总费用为:US 28.39 欧元;CEUS 70.50 欧元;CT 106.23 欧元;MRI 219.61 欧元。在 388/563 例患者中,CEUS 将胰腺病变特征化为实性,仅进行 CT 作为二级检查:节约额为 68870.36 欧元。在 266/414 例患者中,CEUS 将病变诊断为囊性,仅进行 MRI 作为二级检查:节约额为 16825.07 欧元。考虑到患者的整个诊断路径,实性病变的成本节约为 76809.35 欧元,囊性病变的成本节约为 26242.49 欧元,总体节约额为 103051.84 欧元。

结论

CEUS 是区分局灶性胰腺病变的一种具有成本效益的影像学方法,可以指导选择最佳的影像学方式进行术前评估,从而优化资源并确保诊断路径。

相似文献

1
Activity-Based Cost Analysis of Including Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Diagnostic Pathway of Focal Pancreatic Lesions Detected by Abdominal Ultrasound.基于活动的成本分析:将对比增强超声(CEUS)纳入经腹部超声检测到的局灶性胰腺病变的诊断路径中。
Ultraschall Med. 2019 Oct;40(5):618-624. doi: 10.1055/a-0869-7861. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
2
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.超声造影使用声诺维®(六氟化硫微泡)与对比增强计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振成像在局灶性肝脏病变的特征描述和肝转移检测中的比较:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160.
3
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the evaluation of incidental focal liver lesions: A cost-effectiveness analysis.对比增强超声在评估肝脏偶发局灶性病变中的应用:一项成本效益分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct 14;22(38):8605-8614. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8605.
4
Economic assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of focal liver lesions: a multicentre Italian experience.超声造影评估肝脏局灶性病变的经济学评价:意大利多中心经验
Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17 Suppl 6:F99-106. doi: 10.1007/s10406-007-0234-5.
5
[Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of incidental liver lesions - an economical evaluation in comparison with multi-phase computed tomography].[对比增强超声对肝脏偶发病变的特征性诊断——与多期计算机断层扫描的经济学评估]
Ultraschall Med. 2009 Jun;30(3):259-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109449. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
6
Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions--a comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT.超声造影在胰腺实性占位病变诊断中的应用——与常规超声及增强 CT 的对照研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 May 31.
7
Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement patterns for differentiating solid pancreatic lesions.增强超声造影增强模式在鉴别胰腺实性占位性病变中的临床价值。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Mar;32(3):2060-2069. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08243-8. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
8
CEUS versus CT Angiography in the follow-up of abdominal aortic endoprostheses: diagnostic accuracy and activity-based cost analysis.CEUS 与 CT 血管造影在腹主动脉内假体随访中的比较:诊断准确性和基于活动的成本分析。
Radiol Med. 2018 Dec;123(12):904-909. doi: 10.1007/s11547-018-0926-z. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
9
Contrast enhanced ultrasound in focal liver lesions--a cost efficiency study.肝脏局灶性病变的超声造影——一项成本效益研究。
Med Ultrason. 2010 Dec;12(4):280-5.
10
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can guide the therapeutic strategy by improving the detection of colorectal liver metastases.超声造影可以提高结直肠癌肝转移的检出率,从而指导治疗策略。
J Hepatol. 2021 Feb;74(2):419-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.036. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of including contrast-enhanced ultrasound in management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.包含对比增强超声的胰腺囊性肿瘤管理的成本效益分析。
Radiol Med. 2022 Apr;127(4):349-359. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01459-8. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
[Standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in clinical acute and emergency medicine and critical care (CEUS Acute) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGK, ÖGUM, SGUM and DEGUM].[临床急性与急诊医学及重症监护中的标准化超声造影(CEUS急性):德国急诊与重症医学学会(DGIIN)、德国重症医学与急诊医学学会(DIVI)、德国麻醉与重症医学学会(DGINA)、德国麻醉医师协会(DGAI)、德国急诊医师协会(DGK)、奥地利重症与急诊医学学会(ÖGUM)、瑞士重症与急诊医学学会(SGUM)及德国超声医学学会(DEGUM)的共识声明]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Feb;117(Suppl 1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00891-4.
3
Use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in testicular diseases: A comprehensive review.超声造影在睾丸疾病中的应用:全面综述。
Andrology. 2021 Sep;9(5):1369-1382. doi: 10.1111/andr.13057. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Do we need contrast agents for EUS?我们进行超声内镜检查时需要使用造影剂吗?
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):361-368. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_20_20.
5
Modern ultrasound imaging of pancreatic tumors.胰腺肿瘤的现代超声成像
Ultrasonography. 2020 Apr;39(2):105-113. doi: 10.14366/usg.19039. Epub 2019 Aug 27.