Saftoiu Adrian, Napoleon Bertrand, Arcidiacono Paolo Giorgio, Braden Barbara, Burmeister Sean, Carrara Silvia, Cui Xin Wu, Fusaroli Pietro, Gottschalk Uwe, Hocke Michael, Hollerbach Stephan, Iglesias-Garcia Julio, Jenssen Christian, Kitano Masayuki, Larghi Alberto, Oppong Kofi W, Sahai Anand V, Sun Siyu, Burmester Eike, Di Leo Milena, Petrone Maria Chiara, Santos Erwin, Teoh Anthony Y B, Hwang Joo Ha, Rimbas Mihai, Sharma Malay, Puri Rajesh, Kahaleh Michel, Dietrich Christoph F
Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé J Mermoz Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France.
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):361-368. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_20_20.
We recently introduced a series of articles that dealt with controversies in EUS. In Part I, the authors discussed which clinical information is necessary prior to EUS and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking on EUS examinations. Part II focuses on technical details and controversies about the use of EUS in special situations. In this article, important practical issues regarding the application of contrast-enhanced EUS in various clinical settings are raised and controversially discussed from different points of view.
我们最近推出了一系列论述超声内镜（EUS）争议问题的文章。在第一部分，作者们讨论了在进行EUS检查之前哪些临床信息是必要的，以及在开始EUS检查之前是否需要其他成像方式。第二部分聚焦于EUS在特殊情况下使用的技术细节和争议。在本文中，提出了关于在各种临床环境中应用超声内镜造影（CE-EUS）的重要实际问题，并从不同角度进行了有争议的讨论。
