Hartsock Jane A, Schwartz Peter H, Waltz Amy C, Ott Mary A
Faculty investigator with the Indiana University Center for Bioethics at the Indiana University School of Medicine and the director of clinical ethics for the Academic Health Center at Indiana University Health.
Director of the Indiana University Center for Bioethics at the Indiana University School of Medicine and an associate professor of medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine.
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Mar;41(2):14-21. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500008.
As pediatric biobank research grows, additional guidance will be needed about whether researchers should always obtain consent from participants when they reach the legal age of majority. Biobanks struggle with a range of practical and ethical issues related to this question. We propose a framework for the use of anticipatory waivers of consent that is empirically rooted in research that shows that children and adolescents are often developmentally capable of meaningful deliberation about the risks and benefits of participation in research. Accordingly, bright-line legal concepts of majority or competency do not accurately capture the emerging capacity for autonomous decision-making of many pediatric research participants and unnecessarily complicate the issues about contacting participants at the age of majority to obtain consent for the continued or first use of their biospecimens that were obtained during childhood. We believe the proposed framework provides an ethically sound balance between the concern for potential exploitation of vulnerable populations, the impetus for the federal regulations governing research with children, and the need to conduct valuable research in the age of genomic medicine.
随着儿科生物样本库研究的发展,对于研究人员在参与者达到法定成年年龄时是否应始终获得其同意,将需要更多指导。生物样本库在与这个问题相关的一系列实际和伦理问题上存在困难。我们提出了一个使用预先放弃同意的框架,该框架在实证研究的基础上形成,这些研究表明儿童和青少年在发育上通常有能力对参与研究的风险和益处进行有意义的思考。因此,关于成年或能力的明确法律概念并不能准确反映许多儿科研究参与者新兴的自主决策能力,而且不必要地使在参与者成年时联系他们以获得对继续使用或首次使用其童年时期采集的生物样本的同意这一问题变得复杂。我们认为,提议的框架在对弱势群体潜在剥削的担忧、联邦儿童研究监管规定的推动以及基因组医学时代开展有价值研究的需求之间提供了一个伦理上合理的平衡。