Leggett Jack M I, Burt Jennifer S, Ceccato Jo-Maree
School of Psychology.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Jun;73(2):105-117. doi: 10.1037/cep0000164. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
In a simplified repetition blindness (RB) paradigm, university students named target words (C2) that were presented for 72 ms and followed by a pattern mask. A prime word (C1) that was identical or unrelated to the target was read silently at the beginning of each trial, and there was an intervening distractor item displayed for 120 ms between prime and target. When the distractor was a word, there was a large repetition cost for target accuracy at both prime durations (Experiments 1A and 1B). The cost with word distractors was not abolished when instructions about repeats were given (Experiments 2A and 2B). When the distractor was selected from a set of random-letter strings, there was a repetition benefit in target accuracy for a 120-ms prime and no effect for a 480-ms prime (Experiments 3A and 3B). The cost of distractor lexicality implicates competitive effects in event registration and ordering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
在一个简化的重复盲视（RB）范式中，大学生命名呈现72毫秒后跟随模式掩蔽的目标词（C2）。在每次试验开始时，默读一个与目标相同或不相关的启动词（C1），并且在启动词和目标词之间有一个持续120毫秒的干扰项。当干扰项是一个单词时，在两个启动词持续时间下目标准确性都存在较大的重复代价（实验1A和1B）。当给出关于重复的指示时，单词干扰项带来的代价并未消除（实验2A和2B）。当干扰项从一组随机字母串中选择时，对于120毫秒的启动词，目标准确性有重复益处，而对于480毫秒的启动词则没有影响（实验3A和3B）。干扰项词汇性的代价暗示了事件登记和排序中的竞争效应。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2019美国心理学会，保留所有权利）
