• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

天哪!阅读物体名称产生的干扰意味着在图片命名检索过程中存在竞争作用。

My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.

作者信息

Vitkovitch Melanie, Cooper Elisa

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, London, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1229-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655699. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2012.655699
PMID:22390174
Abstract

A related word prime has been found to interfere with picture naming after unrelated intervening trials (word-to-picture interference). Recently, Stroop-type picture-word interference effects have been interpreted in terms of a postlexical response exclusion process rather than a competitive lexical selection process. An experiment is reported that examines whether word-to-picture effects could reflect response exclusion mechanisms and, more generally, strategic processing of the word prime. Forty-eight volunteer university students named aloud sequences of semantically related (and unrelated) word primes and picture targets, separated by two unrelated filler stimuli. On half of the trials, participants were asked to count backwards in threes from a random number presented immediately after naming the prime word. They were also given a surprise recall test at the end of the naming block. Results for naming times and errors indicated a main effect of relatedness; semantic interference effects were not dependent on the unfilled gap following the word prime trial and were also not tied to episodic recall of prime words. The data indicate that slowed picture naming times are more likely to emerge from processes intrinsic to word prime naming rather than controlled processing and do not readily fit the postlexical response exclusion account. The results are considered in relation to two recent accounts of interference over unrelated trials, which refer to some form of competition at, or prior to, lexical access.

摘要

人们发现,一个相关词“prime”在经过无关的中间试验(词对图片干扰)后会干扰图片命名。最近,斯特鲁普式的图片-单词干扰效应已根据词汇后反应排除过程而非竞争性词汇选择过程来解释。本文报告了一项实验,该实验考察了词对图片效应是否能反映反应排除机制,更广泛地说,是否能反映词“prime”的策略性加工。48名志愿大学生大声说出语义相关(和不相关)的词“prime”和图片目标的序列,中间由两个不相关的填充刺激隔开。在一半的试验中,要求参与者在说出“prime”词后立即从呈现的一个随机数开始倒着数三。在命名环节结束时,他们还接受了一次突击回忆测试。命名时间和错误的结果表明了相关性的主效应;语义干扰效应不依赖于词“prime”试验后的未填充间隙,也与“prime”词的情景回忆无关。数据表明,图片命名时间变慢更可能源于词“prime”命名本身的过程,而非控制性加工,并且不太符合词汇后反应排除的解释。本文结合最近关于无关试验干扰的两种解释来考虑这些结果,这两种解释涉及词汇通达时或之前的某种形式的竞争。

相似文献

1
My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.天哪!阅读物体名称产生的干扰意味着在图片命名检索过程中存在竞争作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1229-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655699. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
2
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.
3
Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.单词命名会减慢图片命名的速度,但不影响累积语义干扰。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Apr;195:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
5
Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.干扰模态可在图片-词汇干扰任务中将语义干扰转化为语义促进:对言语产生中词汇通达理论的启示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1443-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017020.
6
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
7
Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming.物体之间的语义相关性会促进物体命名过程中多个语音代码的激活。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Feb;63(2):356-70. doi: 10.1080/17470210902952480. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
8
Inhibitory effects during object name retrieval: the effect of interval between prime and target on picture naming responses.物体命名检索过程中的抑制作用:启动刺激与目标刺激之间的时间间隔对图片命名反应的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2001 Aug;92(Pt 3):483-506.
9
Lexical selection is competitive: evidence from indirectly activated semantic associates during picture naming.词汇选择具有竞争性:图片命名中间接激活的语义联想的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):348-64. doi: 10.1037/a0028941. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
10
The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion.图片-词汇干扰中的分心频率效应:反应排除的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):878-91. doi: 10.1037/a0019128.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Correlates of Semantic Interference and Phonological Facilitation in Picture Naming: A Systematic Review and Coordinate-Based Meta-analysis.图片命名中语义干扰和语音促进的神经关联:一项系统综述和基于坐标的元分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Mar;35(1):35-53. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09631-9. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.一种用于研究语言产生中语义语境效应的新的多词范式。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230439. eCollection 2020.
3
Less is more: neural mechanisms underlying anomia treatment in chronic aphasic patients.
少即是多:慢性失语症患者命名障碍治疗的神经机制。
Brain. 2017 Nov 1;140(11):3039-3054. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx234.
4
What can Written-Words Tell us About Lexical Retrieval in Speech Production?书面文字能告诉我们关于言语产生中的词汇检索的哪些信息?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 6;6:1982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01982. eCollection 2015.
5
With or without semantic mediation: retrieval of lexical representations in sign production.有无语义中介:手语产生中词汇表征的提取
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Apr;20(2):163-71. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu045. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
6
Lexical Retrieval is not by Competition: Evidence from the Blocked Naming Paradigm.词汇检索并非通过竞争:来自受阻命名范式的证据。
J Mem Lang. 2014 Oct;76:253-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003.