Department of Psychology.
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jul;66(4):385-395. doi: 10.1037/cou0000339. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Interpersonal, social, and structural stressors have been identified as key elements that explain health disparities between transgender and cisgender individuals. However, most of this research has focused on binary transgender individuals or has not differentiated between binary and nonbinary individuals; little research has examined the experiences of minority stress or health of those identifying outside the gender binary. Guided by intersectionality and drawing on a sample of 3,568 college students from the Center for Collegiate Mental Health's 2012-2016 database-of whom 892 identified outside the gender binary-we conducted analyses of demographic and outcome measures administered in participants' 1st counseling appointment, examining differences between cisgender, transgender, and genderqueer individuals. We found that genderqueer individuals were harassed, sexually abused, and subjected to traumatic events at higher rates than were either cisgender or binary transgender individuals, with approximately 50% of genderqueer individuals reporting one of these experiences. We found that genderqueer individuals experienced more anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and eating concerns than did binary transgender and cisgender individuals and more social anxiety than did cisgender individuals. Genderqueer individuals more frequently reported self-harm and suicidality than did any other group, with approximately 2/3 of participants' having contemplated and nearly 50% making a suicide attempt. We extend current theorizing about minority stress (Hendricks & Testa, 2012; Meyer, 2003) to include genderqueer individuals and delineate several structural aspects of genderqueer experiences that may be responsible for these trends, including others' lack of knowledge about genderqueer experiences and pronouns, poor access to legal and medical resources, and systemic discrimination. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
人际间、社会和结构性压力源已被确定为解释跨性别者和顺性别者之间健康差异的关键因素。然而,大多数此类研究都集中在二元跨性别者或未区分二元和非二元性别者;很少有研究考察处于性别二元之外的少数群体压力或健康体验。本研究以交叉性为指导,以大学生心理健康中心 2012-2016 年数据库中的 3568 名大学生为样本(其中 892 人在性别上处于二元之外),对参与者首次咨询预约时进行的人口统计学和结果测量进行了分析,以检验顺性别、跨性别和性别酷儿个体之间的差异。我们发现,性别酷儿个体受到骚扰、性虐待和创伤性事件的发生率高于顺性别或二元跨性别个体,约有 50%的性别酷儿个体报告了其中一种经历。我们发现,性别酷儿个体的焦虑、抑郁、心理困扰和饮食问题比二元跨性别和顺性别个体更严重,社交焦虑比顺性别个体更严重。性别酷儿个体比任何其他群体更频繁地报告自我伤害和自杀意念,大约 2/3 的参与者有过自杀念头,近 50%的参与者有过自杀企图。我们将当前关于少数群体压力的理论(Hendricks & Testa, 2012; Meyer, 2003)扩展到包括性别酷儿个体,并描述了可能导致这些趋势的性别酷儿体验的几个结构性方面,包括他人对性别酷儿体验和代词的缺乏了解、获得合法和医疗资源的机会有限,以及系统性歧视。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。