Suppr超能文献

乌得勒支性别焦虑量表 - 性别光谱版(UGDS-GS):跨性别者、非二元性别者及女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和酷儿样本中的结构效度

Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale - Gender Spectrum (UGDS-GS): Construct validity among transgender, nonbinary, and LGBQ samples.

作者信息

McGuire Jenifer K, Berg Dianne, Catalpa Jory M, Morrow Quin J, Fish Jessica N, Nic Rider G, Steensma Thomas, Cohen-Kettenis Peggy T, Spencer Katherine

机构信息

Family Social Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Family Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Transgend Health. 2020 Apr 11;21(2):194-208. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1723460. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Researchers combined both versions of the original Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale (UGDS) to create a single gender spectrum version (UGDS-GS) which measures dissatisfaction with gender identity and expression over time as well as comfort with affirmed gender identity. This study examined the construct validity of the newly revised, UGDS-GS. Tests of measurement invariance were conducted in stages to assess measurement invariance of the UGDS-GS across three groups: cisgender, binary transgender, and nonbinary/genderqueer. Findings indicate that the UGDS-GS functions acceptably in all three gender groups (configural and metric invariance). Also, across binary transgender and nonbinary/genderqueer groups, the measure functions very similarly with all four types of invariance. Item level findings highlight the specificity of the measure to distinguish experiences of binary transgender and nonbinary/genderqueer persons differently from cisgender LGBQ individuals. The UGDS-GS demonstrates a large degree of invariance across binary transgender, nonbinary/genderqueer, and cisgender LGBQ subgroups; and therefore, findings indicate this revision to be a substantial improvement. This 18-item self-report, Likert-type scale measure is a) inclusive of all gender identities and expressions (e.g., transfeminine spectrum, transmasculine spectrum, genderqueer, nonbinary, cisgender); b) appropriate for use longitudinally from adolescence to adulthood; and c) administered at any point in the social or medical transition process, if applicable, or in community-based research focused on gender dysphoria that examines cisgender and transgender persons.

摘要

研究人员将原始乌得勒支性别焦虑量表(UGDS)的两个版本合并,创建了一个单一的性别光谱版本(UGDS-GS),该版本可以测量随时间推移对性别认同和表达的不满,以及对确认的性别认同的舒适度。本研究检验了新修订的UGDS-GS的结构效度。分阶段进行测量不变性测试,以评估UGDS-GS在三个群体中的测量不变性:顺性别者、二元变性者和非二元/酷儿性别者。研究结果表明,UGDS-GS在所有三个性别群体中(构型和度量不变性)功能良好。此外,在二元变性者和非二元/酷儿性别群体中,该测量在所有四种不变性类型中的功能非常相似。项目层面的研究结果突出了该测量方法在区分二元变性者和非二元/酷儿性别者与顺性别LGBQ个体经历方面的特异性。UGDS-GS在二元变性者、非二元/酷儿性别者和顺性别LGBQ亚组中表现出很大程度的不变性;因此,研究结果表明这一修订是一个实质性的改进。这个包含18个条目的自我报告式李克特量表测量方法具有以下特点:a)包括所有性别认同和表达(例如,跨女性光谱、跨男性光谱、酷儿性别、非二元、顺性别);b)适用于从青春期到成年期的纵向使用;c)在社会或医学过渡过程的任何阶段(如适用),或在以性别焦虑为重点、研究顺性别和变性者的社区研究中使用。

相似文献

5
Subjective Ratings of Gender Dysphoria Scales by Transgender Individuals.跨性别个体对性别焦虑量表的主观评价。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):479-488. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01556-2. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

7
Shifting Paradigms: A Deep Dive Into Public Perceptions of Gender-affirming Surgery.转变范式:深入探究公众对性别确认手术的认知
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jan 21;13(1):e6472. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006472. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Readability of Patient-reported Outcome Measures Used in Plastic Surgery.整形手术中使用的患者报告结局量表的可读性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):e6351. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006351. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

9
Clinical management of youth with gender dysphoria in Vancouver.温哥华的性别焦虑青年的临床管理。
J Pediatr. 2014 Apr;164(4):906-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.068. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验