Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0213543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213543. eCollection 2019.
Routine general anesthesia is considered to be safe in healthy individuals. However, pre-clinical studies in mice, rats, and monkeys have repeatedly demonstrated that exposure to anesthetic agents during early post-natal periods can lead to acute neurotoxicity. More concerning, later-life defects in cognition, assessed by behavioral assays for learning and memory, have been reported. Although the potential for anesthetics to damage the neonatal brain is well-documented, the clinical significance of the pre-clinical models in which damage is induced remains quite unclear. Here, we systematically evaluate critical physiological parameters in post-natal day 7 neonatal mice exposed to 1.5% isoflurane for 2-4 hours, the most common anesthesia induced neurotoxicity paradigm in this animal model. We find that 2 or more hours of anesthesia exposure results in dramatic respiratory and metabolic changes that may limit interpretation of this paradigm to the clinical situation. Our data indicate that neonatal mouse models of AIN are not necessarily appropriate representations of human exposures.
在健康个体中,常规全身麻醉被认为是安全的。然而,在小鼠、大鼠和猴子的临床前研究中反复表明,在出生后早期暴露于麻醉剂会导致急性神经毒性。更令人担忧的是,通过学习和记忆行为评估,报告了生命后期认知缺陷。尽管麻醉剂有可能损害新生儿的大脑,但在诱导损伤的临床前模型中,其临床意义仍相当不清楚。在这里,我们系统地评估了暴露于 1.5%异氟烷中 2-4 小时的出生后第 7 天新生小鼠的关键生理参数,这是该动物模型中最常见的诱导神经毒性的麻醉方案。我们发现,2 小时或更长时间的麻醉暴露会导致呼吸和代谢的剧烈变化,这可能限制了该范式在临床情况下的解释。我们的数据表明,AIN 的新生小鼠模型不一定能代表人类的暴露情况。