• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习与伴侣匹配:基于个性特征预测未来的关系质量。

Machine learning meets partner matching: Predicting the future relationship quality based on personality traits.

机构信息

HMKW Hochschule für Medien, Kommunikation und Wirtschaft, University of Applied Science, Berlin, Germany.

LYTiQ GmbH, Germany & Indian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0213569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213569. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0213569
PMID:30897110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6428342/
Abstract

To what extent is it possible to use machine learning to predict the outcome of a relationship, based on the personality of both partners? In the present study, relationship satisfaction, conflicts, and separation (intents) of 192 partners four years after the completion of questionnaires concerning their personality traits was predicted. A 10x10-fold cross-validation was used to ensure that the results of the linear regression models are reproducible. The findings indicate that machine learning techniques can improve the prediction of relationship quality (37% of variance explained), and that the perceived relationship quality of a partner is mostly dependent on his or her own individual personality traits. Additionally, the influences of different sets of variables on predictions are shown: partner and similarity effects did not incrementally predict relationship quality beyond actor effects and general personality traits predicted relationship quality less strongly than relationship-related personality.

摘要

基于双方的个性,机器学习在多大程度上可以预测关系的结果?在本研究中,对 192 对伴侣在完成有关其个性特征的问卷四年后,对关系满意度、冲突和分离(意图)进行了预测。使用 10x10 折交叉验证以确保线性回归模型的结果可重现。研究结果表明,机器学习技术可以提高关系质量的预测(解释方差的 37%),并且伴侣对关系的感知质量主要取决于他或她自己的个性特征。此外,还显示了不同变量集对预测的影响:伴侣和相似性效应对关系质量的预测并没有超过演员效应,而一般个性特征对关系质量的预测不如关系相关个性特征强烈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fd/6428342/a4b4e307a8c4/pone.0213569.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fd/6428342/cbfbff434426/pone.0213569.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fd/6428342/8ba8c79597f8/pone.0213569.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fd/6428342/a4b4e307a8c4/pone.0213569.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fd/6428342/cbfbff434426/pone.0213569.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fd/6428342/8ba8c79597f8/pone.0213569.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00fd/6428342/a4b4e307a8c4/pone.0213569.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning meets partner matching: Predicting the future relationship quality based on personality traits.机器学习与伴侣匹配:基于个性特征预测未来的关系质量。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0213569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213569. eCollection 2019.
2
The dyadic effects of Type D personality on health in romantic couples.夫妻双方的 D 型人格特质对健康的双向影响。
Psychol Health. 2020 Jul;35(7):811-823. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1679371. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Why do personality traits predict divorce? Multiple pathways through satisfaction.为什么人格特质可以预测离婚?满意度的多种作用途径。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):978-96. doi: 10.1037/a0036190.
4
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.机器学习揭示了 43 项纵向夫妻研究中最稳健的关系质量自我报告预测因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19061-19071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917036117. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Personality pathology and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples.恋爱和已婚伴侣中的人格病理学与关系满意度。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jan;9(1):81-92. doi: 10.1037/per0000219. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.浪漫欲望是否可预测?应用机器学习分析初始浪漫吸引力
Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1478-1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714580. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
7
Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being.人格对幸福感的纵向主体间、伴侣间和相似性效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):e51-e70. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000211. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
8
Effects of big-five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach-athlete dyads.大五人格特质对中国教练-运动员二元组中关系质量和满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):568-80. doi: 10.1111/sms.12329. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
9
Discrepancy in Personality Perceptions Is Related to Relationship Satisfaction: Findings from Dyadic Latent Discrepancy Analyses.人格认知差异与关系满意度相关:二元潜在差异分析的结果
J Pers. 2016 Oct;84(5):658-70. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12189. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Consistency between individuals' past and current romantic partners' own reports of their personalities.个体过去和当前浪漫伴侣自身报告的人格的一致性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 25;116(26):12793-12797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902937116. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting conversational satisfaction of face-to-face conversation through interpersonal similarity in resting-state functional connectivity.通过静息态功能连接中的人际相似性预测面对面交谈的对话满意度。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 12;14(1):6015. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56718-7.
2
Testing the bipolar assumption of Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory for Korean adults using classification and multidimensional scaling.使用分类和多维尺度分析对韩国成年人的辛格-卢米斯类型部署量表的双极假设进行检验。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;14:1249185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249185. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting couple therapy outcomes based on speech acoustic features.基于语音声学特征预测夫妻治疗效果。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185123. eCollection 2017.
2
Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.浪漫欲望是否可预测?应用机器学习分析初始浪漫吸引力
Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1478-1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714580. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.在心理学中选择预测而不是解释:来自机器学习的教训。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1100-1122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693393. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
4
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
5
Interactions between donor Agreeableness and recipient characteristics in predicting charitable donation and positive social evaluation.捐赠者的宜人性与受赠者特征在预测慈善捐赠和积极社会评价方面的相互作用。
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 18;3:e1089. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1089. eCollection 2015.
6
Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science.在线约会:从心理科学视角的批判性分析
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012 Jan;13(1):3-66. doi: 10.1177/1529100612436522.
7
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.基于计算机的人格判断比人类做出的判断更准确。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 27;112(4):1036-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418680112. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Why do personality traits predict divorce? Multiple pathways through satisfaction.为什么人格特质可以预测离婚?满意度的多种作用途径。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):978-96. doi: 10.1037/a0036190.
9
How large are actor and partner effects of personality on relationship satisfaction? The importance of controlling for shared method variance.人格对关系满意度的演员和伴侣效应有多大?控制共同方法偏差的重要性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Oct;39(10):1359-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167213492429. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
10
False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.虚假阳性心理学:在数据收集和分析中不披露的灵活性使得任何事物都可以被呈现为显著的。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632. Epub 2011 Oct 17.