Bader J P
Dig Dis Sci. 1986 Sep;31(9 Suppl):43S-56S. doi: 10.1007/BF01295989.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a cancer in a disappointing location. However, its location clearly has an advantage that could theoretically permit efficient secondary prevention: the preceding of the cancer by a benign lesion, ie, the adenoma. Complete colonoscopy and its substitute, the double-contrast barium enema, and their specific limitations, must be reserved for high-risk patients: hereditary cancers and ulcerative colitis. For all the others, ie, adults of 45 years of age and with standard risks, the proposal is either to select the patients to be colonoscoped through occult blood testing of the stools or to perform a fiber sigmoidoscopy or a combination of both. Although imperfect, both methods allow the detection of polyps and cancers at a presymptomatic stage, when they are either benign or malignant, but localized and with a better prognosis. However, the absolute proof of the benefits of this strategy of screening would be the demonstration by controlled studies of a prolonged survival rate or a decrease in morbidity. Until now, this proof is not fully available.
结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是一种发病部位令人失望的癌症。然而,其发病部位显然具有一个理论上可实现有效二级预防的优势:癌症之前存在良性病变,即腺瘤。全结肠镜检查及其替代方法,即双重对比钡灌肠检查,以及它们的特定局限性,必须仅用于高危患者:遗传性癌症和溃疡性结肠炎患者。对于所有其他患者,即45岁且具有标准风险的成年人,建议要么通过粪便潜血检测来选择接受结肠镜检查的患者,要么进行纤维乙状结肠镜检查,或者两者结合。虽然并不完美,但这两种方法都能在症状出现前阶段检测到息肉和癌症,此时它们无论是良性还是恶性,但都局限于局部且预后较好。然而,这种筛查策略益处的绝对证据将是对照研究证明生存率延长或发病率降低。到目前为止,这种证据并不完全具备。