Hayashi Yusuke, Friedel Jonathan E, Foreman Anne M, Wirth Oliver
Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Psychol Rec. 2019 Jun;69(2):225-237. doi: 10.1007/s40732-019-00341-w. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
The overarching goal of the present study was to determine whether a behavioral economic framework of demand analysis is applicable to texting while driving. To this end, we developed a novel hypothetical task designed to quantify the intensity and elasticity of the demand for social interaction from texting while driving. This task involved a scenario in which participants receive a text message while driving, and they rated the likelihood of replying to a text message immediately versus waiting to reply until arriving at a destination when the amounts of a fine for texting while driving ranged from $1 to $300. To assess the construct validity of the task, the scenario presented two delays to a destination (15 min and 60 min). The demand for social interaction from texting was more intense (greater at the lowest amount of the fine) and less elastic (less sensitive to the increase in the amounts of the fine) for drivers who self-reported a higher frequency of texting while driving than for those who self-reported a lower frequency of texting while driving. Demand was also more intense and less elastic under the 60-min delay condition than under the 15-min condition. The results of this proof-of-concept study suggest that behavioral economic demand analyses are potentially useful for understanding and predicting texting while driving.
本研究的总体目标是确定需求分析的行为经济框架是否适用于驾驶时发短信。为此,我们开发了一项新颖的假设任务,旨在量化驾驶时发短信对社交互动需求的强度和弹性。该任务涉及这样一个场景:参与者在驾驶时收到一条短信,当驾驶时发短信的罚款金额从1美元到300美元不等时,他们要对立即回复短信与等到到达目的地后再回复的可能性进行评分。为了评估该任务的结构效度,场景中设置了到达目的地的两种延迟情况(15分钟和60分钟)。与那些自我报告驾驶时发短信频率较低的司机相比,自我报告驾驶时发短信频率较高的司机,因发短信产生的社交互动需求更强(在最低罚款金额时更强)且弹性更小(对罚款金额增加的敏感度更低)。在60分钟延迟条件下的需求也比15分钟条件下更强且弹性更小。这项概念验证研究的结果表明,行为经济需求分析对于理解和预测驾驶时发短信可能是有用的。