Hayashi Yusuke, Rivera Esteban A, Modico James G, Foreman Anne M, Wirth Oliver
Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton, 76 University Drive, Hazleton, PA 18202, USA.
Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton, 76 University Drive, Hazleton, PA 18202, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the cognitive processes underlying texting while driving. A sample of 120 college students completed a survey to assess how frequently they send and read a text message while driving. Based on this information, students were assigned to one of two groups: 20 students who frequently text while driving and 20 matched-control students who infrequently text while driving but were similar in gender, age, years of education, and years driving. The groups were compared on the extent to which they differed in self-reported measures of executive function and impulsivity. The groups were also compared on a behavioral measure of impulsivity: the extent to which they discounted hypothetical monetary rewards as a function of the delay. For this measure, the students made repeated choices between smaller monetary rewards available immediately and larger rewards available after delays ranging from 1 week to 6 months. The results show that the group of students who frequently text while driving showed (a) significantly lower levels of executive function and (b) higher levels of self-reported impulsivity, although the groups did not differ significantly on the behavioral measure of impulsivity. These results support a general conclusion that drivers with lower levels of executive function and higher levels of impulsivity are more likely to text while driving.
本研究的目的是调查开车时发短信背后的认知过程。120名大学生参与了一项调查,以评估他们开车时发送和阅读短信的频率。基于这些信息,学生们被分为两组:20名经常开车时发短信的学生和20名匹配的对照学生,后者开车时很少发短信,但在性别、年龄、受教育年限和驾驶年限方面相似。比较两组在自我报告的执行功能和冲动性测量上的差异程度。两组还在冲动性的行为测量上进行了比较:即他们将假设的金钱奖励根据延迟进行折扣的程度。对于这项测量,学生们在立即可得的较小金钱奖励和延迟1周到6个月后可得的较大奖励之间反复做出选择。结果表明,经常开车时发短信的学生组(a)执行功能水平显著较低,(b)自我报告的冲动性水平较高,尽管两组在冲动性的行为测量上没有显著差异。这些结果支持了一个普遍结论,即执行功能水平较低和冲动性水平较高的司机在开车时更有可能发短信。