• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶时发短信中延迟和概率折扣的作用:迈向一个转化科学项目的发展。

The roles of delay and probability discounting in texting while driving: Toward the development of a translational scientific program.

作者信息

Hayashi Yusuke, Fessler Heather J, Friedel Jonathan E, Foreman Anne M, Wirth Oliver

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Sep;110(2):229-242. doi: 10.1002/jeab.460. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1002/jeab.460
PMID:30028007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6376405/
Abstract

A sample of 109 college students completed a survey to assess how frequently they send or read text messages while driving. In a novel discounting task with a hypothetical scenario in which participants receive a text message while driving, they rated the likelihood of replying to a text message immediately versus waiting to reply until arriving at a destination. The scenario presented several delays to a destination and probabilities of a motor vehicle crash. The likelihood of waiting to reply decreased as a function of both the delay until the destination and the probability of a motor vehicle crash. Self-reported higher frequencies of texting while driving were associated with greater rates of both delay and probability discounting. The degree of delay discounting was altered as a function of the probability of a motor vehicle crash and vice versa. These results suggest that both delay and probability discounting are important underlying mechanisms of drivers' decision to text while driving.

摘要

109名大学生参与了一项调查,以评估他们在开车时发送或阅读短信的频率。在一项新颖的折扣任务中,设定了一个假设情景:参与者在开车时收到一条短信,他们要对立即回复短信与等到到达目的地后再回复的可能性进行评分。该情景呈现了到达目的地的几种延迟情况以及发生机动车碰撞的概率。等待回复的可能性随着到达目的地的延迟时间和机动车碰撞概率的增加而降低。自我报告的开车时发短信频率较高与延迟率和概率折扣率都较高有关。延迟折扣程度会根据机动车碰撞概率而改变,反之亦然。这些结果表明,延迟折扣和概率折扣都是驾驶员开车时决定发短信的重要潜在机制。

相似文献

1
The roles of delay and probability discounting in texting while driving: Toward the development of a translational scientific program.驾驶时发短信中延迟和概率折扣的作用:迈向一个转化科学项目的发展。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Sep;110(2):229-242. doi: 10.1002/jeab.460. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
2
A behavioral economic analysis of texting while driving: Delay discounting processes.驾驶时发短信的行为经济学分析:延迟折扣过程。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.028. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
3
Social distance and texting while driving: A behavioral economic analysis of social discounting.社交距离与开车时发短信:社会贴现的行为经济学分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(7):702-707. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1636233. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
Texting while driving as impulsive choice: A behavioral economic analysis.开车时发短信作为冲动选择:一项行为经济学分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Texting while driving, executive function, and impulsivity in college students.大学生边开车边发短信、执行功能与冲动性
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
6
Threat appeals reduce impulsive decision making associated with texting while driving: A behavioral economic approach.威胁呼吁减少与驾车时发短信相关的冲动决策:一种行为经济学方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213453. eCollection 2019.
7
A Behavioral Economic Analysis of Demand for Texting while Driving.驾车时发短信需求的行为经济学分析
Psychol Rec. 2019 Jun;69(2):225-237. doi: 10.1007/s40732-019-00341-w. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
A multiyear assessment of a hospital-school program to promote teen motor vehicle safety.一项关于促进青少年机动车安全的医院-学校项目的多年评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Aug;83(2):289-295. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001521.
9
Objective assessment of the effects of texting while driving: a simulator study.驾驶时发短信影响的客观评估:一项模拟器研究。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2015;22(4):387-92. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2014.942325. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
10
Impact of texting on young drivers' behavior and safety on urban and rural roads through a simulation experiment.通过模拟实验研究短信对城乡年轻驾驶员驾驶行为和安全的影响。
J Safety Res. 2014 Jun;49:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A hierarchical cluster analysis of young drivers based on their perceived risk and frequency of texting while driving.基于感知风险和驾车时发短信频率的年轻驾驶员层次聚类分析。
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
A behavioral economic demand analysis of mothers' decision to exclusively breastfeed in the workplace.母亲在工作场所选择纯母乳喂养的行为经济学需求分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2022 Jul;118(1):132-147. doi: 10.1002/jeab.772. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Behavioral economic methods to inform infectious disease response: Prevention, testing, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward Narrative Theory: Interventions for Reinforcer Pathology in Health Behavior.走向叙事理论:健康行为强化物病理学的干预措施。
Nebr Symp Motiv. 2017;64:227-267.
2
Texting while driving, executive function, and impulsivity in college students.大学生边开车边发短信、执行功能与冲动性
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
3
Adolescent Cellphone Use While Driving: An Overview of the Literature and Promising Future Directions for Prevention.青少年驾车时使用手机:文献综述及预防的未来发展方向
行为经济学方法在传染病应对中的应用:COVID-19 大流行中的预防、检测和疫苗接种。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0258828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258828. eCollection 2022.
4
Rethinking Cell Phone Use While Driving: Isolated Risk Behavior or a Pattern of Risk-Taking Associated with Impulsivity in Young Drivers?重新审视驾车时使用手机的行为:这是一种孤立的风险行为,还是与年轻驾驶员冲动性相关的冒险模式?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115640.
5
Texting while driving: A discrete choice experiment.开车时发短信:一项离散选择实验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105823. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105823. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Relationships between Driver Errors and Delay Discounting in a Simulated Driving Task.模拟驾驶任务中驾驶员失误与延迟折扣之间的关系
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Feb 19;43(3):487-500. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00246-y. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Threat appeals reduce impulsive decision making associated with texting while driving: A behavioral economic approach.威胁呼吁减少与驾车时发短信相关的冲动决策:一种行为经济学方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213453. eCollection 2019.
8
A Monte Carlo method for comparing generalized estimating equations to conventional statistical techniques for discounting data.一种蒙特卡罗方法,用于比较广义估计方程与传统的折扣数据统计技术。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):207-224. doi: 10.1002/jeab.497. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
Media Commun. 2016 Jun 16;4(3):79-89. doi: 10.17645/mac.v4i3.536.
4
A behavioral economic analysis of texting while driving: Delay discounting processes.驾驶时发短信的行为经济学分析:延迟折扣过程。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.028. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
5
Effects of delay and probability combinations on discounting in humans.延迟与概率组合对人类折扣的影响。
Behav Processes. 2016 Oct;131:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
6
An Evaluation of the Effects of a Mild Delayed Verbal Punisher on Choice of an Immediate Reinforcer by Children With Autism.轻度延迟言语惩罚对自闭症儿童即时强化物选择影响的评估
Behav Modif. 2016 Sep;40(5):713-30. doi: 10.1177/0145445515622382. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Texting while driving as impulsive choice: A behavioral economic analysis.开车时发短信作为冲动选择:一项行为经济学分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
8
Regret Expression and Social Learning Increases Delay to Sexual Gratification.后悔表达与社会学习会增加性满足延迟。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 17;10(8):e0135977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135977. eCollection 2015.
9
Delay and probability discounting of sexual and monetary outcomes in individuals with cocaine use disorders and matched controls.可卡因使用障碍患者与匹配对照组在性和金钱结果方面的延迟及概率折扣
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128641. eCollection 2015.
10
The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations.短信禁令对机动车碰撞相关住院情况的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):859-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302537. Epub 2015 Mar 19.