Suppr超能文献

成年柔道运动员上身温盖特测试分类表

Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes.

作者信息

Franchini Emerson

机构信息

Martial Arts and Combat Sports Research Group, Sport Department, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Combat Centre, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

J Exerc Rehabil. 2019 Feb 25;15(1):55-59. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836520.260. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare the upper-body Wingate test performance of judo athletes from different weight categories and to create a classificatory table for this test. A total of 179 judo athletes performed an upper-body Wingate test, following standardized recommendations (30-sec duration, and a load equivalent to 0.06 kg/kg of body mass). Absolute and relative peak power (PP) and mean power (MP) were determined. Weight categories were compared through a one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test. The effect size was determined by partial eta squared. There was a large effect of weight category in absolute PP and MP, with lower values for the lighter categories (<0.05), but it is important to note that absolute PP and MP did not differ (>0.05) between subsequent weight categories. Moreover, when the relative PP and MP were considered, no significant differences were found (>0.05). The higher values of PP and MP achieved by heavier judo athletes compared to lighter ones during the upper-body Wingate test is likely related to the higher total muscle mass presented by the first group compared to the later. Indeed, judo athletes from different weight category presented similar relative PP and MP, likely due to the judo training demands as well as consequence of a selection of athletes with the higher potential to develop upper-body anaerobic fitness. Finally, the normative classificatory table created may be useful as a reference in judo athletes' anaerobic evaluation.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较不同体重级别的柔道运动员上半身温盖特测试的表现,并为该测试创建一个分类表。共有179名柔道运动员按照标准化建议(持续30秒,负荷相当于体重的0.06 kg/kg)进行了上半身温盖特测试。测定了绝对和相对峰值功率(PP)以及平均功率(MP)。通过单因素方差分析比较体重级别,随后进行Tukey检验。效应大小由偏 eta 平方确定。体重级别对绝对PP和MP有很大影响,较轻级别的值较低(<0.05),但需要注意的是,后续体重级别之间的绝对PP和MP没有差异(>0.05)。此外,当考虑相对PP和MP时,未发现显著差异(>0.05)。在进行上半身温盖特测试时,较重的柔道运动员比较轻的运动员获得的PP和MP值更高,这可能与第一组运动员相比第二组运动员具有更高的总肌肉量有关。事实上,不同体重级别的柔道运动员表现出相似的相对PP和MP,这可能是由于柔道训练要求以及选拔具有更高上半身无氧适能发展潜力的运动员的结果。最后,创建的规范性分类表可能作为柔道运动员无氧评估的参考很有用。

相似文献

1
Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes.成年柔道运动员上身温盖特测试分类表
J Exerc Rehabil. 2019 Feb 25;15(1):55-59. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836520.260. eCollection 2019 Feb.
10
Physiological profiles of elite judo athletes.优秀柔道运动员的生理特征。
Sports Med. 2011 Feb 1;41(2):147-66. doi: 10.2165/11538580-000000000-00000.

本文引用的文献

3
Energy-System Contributions to Simulated Judo Matches.能量系统对模拟柔道比赛的贡献。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 May;12(5):676-683. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0750. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6
The physiology of judo-specific training modalities.柔道专项训练模式的生理学。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 May;28(5):1474-81. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000281.
8
Physiological profiles of elite judo athletes.优秀柔道运动员的生理特征。
Sports Med. 2011 Feb 1;41(2):147-66. doi: 10.2165/11538580-000000000-00000.
10
Technical variation in a sample of high level judo players.高水平柔道运动员样本中的技术差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Jun;106(3):859-69. doi: 10.2466/pms.106.3.859-869.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验