Bioethics Centre, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Department of Anatomy, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 Jul;12(4):444-453. doi: 10.1002/ase.1876. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
In China as elsewhere in the world, human bodies and body parts have long been used for a wide range of medical and non-medical purposes. In recent decades, China has played a considerable role in some of the public exhibitions of plastinated bodies and body parts, and the commercial trade in organ donations. These contemporary developments have raised numerous challenging ethical and governance questions. In spite of the growing role of China in these, there have been few studies devoted to Chinese ethical thinking that might govern its policies on the use of human bodies and body parts, and in particular on the issue of commercialization. The present study is an attempt to bridge this gap, and concludes that Confucian thinking stresses the primacy of righteousness over profits and utilities. This conclusion is reached directly by drawing on Confucian ethical responses to the peculiar practice of using human body parts, such as placenta and flesh, as drugs in traditional Chinese medicine in imperial China and what has been called "yili zhibian," the major Confucian discourse on yi (righteousness or justice) and li (profit or interest) in its long history. The principle of prioritizing righteousness over profit leads to a general moral opposition to the commodification of human bodies and body parts. While Confucianism may not place an absolute prohibition on any such use, it does require that any commercial uses are made subject to the fundamental moral principles, such as righteousness, as well as adequate ethical governance procedures.
在中国和世界其他地方一样,人体和人体部位长期以来一直被用于广泛的医疗和非医疗目的。近几十年来,中国在一些人体和人体部位塑化标本的公开展览以及器官捐赠的商业交易中发挥了相当大的作用。这些当代的发展提出了许多具有挑战性的伦理和治理问题。尽管中国在这些方面的作用越来越大,但很少有研究致力于探讨中国的伦理思想,这些思想可能会规范其使用人体和人体部位的政策,特别是商业化问题。本研究试图弥补这一空白,并得出结论,即儒家思想强调义高于利和功利。这一结论是通过借鉴儒家伦理对中国古代用人的身体部位,如胎盘和人肉入药的特殊做法的回应,以及被称为“义利之辨”的儒家关于义(正义或公正)和利(利润或利益)的主要论述而直接得出的。义高于利的原则导致了对人体和人体部位商品化的普遍道德反对。虽然儒家思想可能不会绝对禁止任何此类用途,但它确实要求任何商业用途都必须符合基本的道德原则,如正义,以及充分的伦理治理程序。