• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010-2016 年印度剖宫产趋势、地域差异和社会经济差异。

Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016.

机构信息

Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement-Centre Population et Développement, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190526. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0526.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0526
PMID:30901040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6583298/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The World Health Organization recommends that rates of cesarean delivery range from 10% to 15%. India has the largest annual number of births in the world and needs updates of existing estimates.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a new set of estimates of the rates of cesarean delivery and to map regional and socioeconomic disparities within these rates in India.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study primarily based on cross-sectional figures drawn from the fourth round of the National Family and Health Survey conducted from January 20, 2015, through December 4, 2016, by the Indian Institute for Population Sciences in Mumbai. The survey interviewed 699 686 girls and women aged 15 to 49 years and collected information on their last 3 pregnancies since January 2010 (259 627 births). The study population was statistically representative of India's 36 states and Union territories and its 640 districts. The survey also included information on the socioeconomic status of households. The research is based on data tabulations and mapping and on spatial and regression analyses of microdata. Socioeconomic inequalities in access to cesarean deliveries were assessed using the Gini coefficient. Data were analyzed from August to October 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rate of cesarean deliveries by regional and socioeconomic characteristics.

RESULTS

The cesarean birth rate computed for 699 686 Indian girls and women aged 15 to 49 years (mean [SD] age, 26.8 [5.0] years) was 17.2% (95% CI, 17.1%-17.3%) in 2010 to 2016, which corresponds to an estimated 4.38 million cesarean deliveries per year during the period (95% CI, 4.34-4.41 million) in India. Cesarean birth rates vary widely within the country, with a range of 5.8% (95% CI, 5.1%-6.5%) to 40.1% (95% CI, 38.4%-41.8%) across states and 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3%-4.6%) to 35.9% (35.4%-36.4%) across socioeconomic quintiles. The rate significantly increased from 9.2% (95% CI, 9.1%-9.3%) in 2004 to 2008. According to the recommended 10% to 15% benchmark of cesarean birth rates by the WHO, the estimated deficit of cesarean births in India is 0.5 million per year, whereas the estimated excess of cesarean births is 1.8 million. The overall Gini coefficient of inequality in access to cesarean deliveries is 46.4.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The rate of cesarean births is increasing in India and has already crossed the World Health Organization threshold of 15%. More research is needed to understand the factors behind the rapid rise of cesarean deliveries among affluent groups and in more developed regions.

摘要

重要性

世界卫生组织建议剖宫产率应在 10%至 15%之间。印度每年的分娩量居世界首位,需要更新现有的估计数据。

目的

提供一组新的剖宫产率估计值,并绘制印度国内剖宫产率的区域和社会经济差异图。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究主要基于 2015 年 1 月 20 日至 2016 年 12 月 4 日期间由印度人口科学研究所进行的第四次全国家庭与健康调查的横断面数据。该调查采访了 699686 名年龄在 15 至 49 岁的女孩和妇女,并收集了自 2010 年 1 月以来的最近 3 次妊娠信息(259627 例分娩)。研究人群在统计学上代表了印度的 36 个邦和联邦属地以及 640 个县。该调查还包括了有关家庭社会经济状况的信息。本研究基于数据制表和制图以及微观数据的空间和回归分析。利用基尼系数评估获得剖宫产的社会经济不平等情况。数据分析于 2018 年 8 月至 10 月进行。

主要结局和测量指标

按区域和社会经济特征划分的剖宫产率。

结果

对 699686 名年龄在 15 至 49 岁的印度女孩和妇女(平均[标准差]年龄为 26.8[5.0]岁)的剖宫产分娩率进行计算,在 2010 年至 2016 年期间,剖宫产率为 17.2%(95%置信区间,17.1%-17.3%),这相当于同期印度每年估计有 438 万例剖宫产(95%置信区间,434 万-441 万)。印度国内剖宫产率差异很大,各州之间的范围为 5.8%(95%置信区间,5.1%-6.5%)至 40.1%(95%置信区间,38.4%-41.8%),社会经济五分位数之间的范围为 4.4%(95%置信区间,4.3%-4.6%)至 35.9%(35.4%-36.4%)。该比率从 2004 年至 2008 年的 9.2%(95%置信区间,9.1%-9.3%)显著增加。根据世界卫生组织建议的 10%至 15%剖宫产率基准,印度每年估计有 0.5 万例剖宫产不足,而估计有 180 万例剖宫产过多。剖宫产获取机会不平等的总体基尼系数为 46.4。

结论和相关性

印度的剖宫产率正在上升,已经超过了世界卫生组织 15%的阈值。需要进一步研究以了解富裕群体和较发达地区剖宫产率迅速上升的背后因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfde/6583298/d519327197fb/jamanetwopen-2-e190526-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfde/6583298/5ef715236242/jamanetwopen-2-e190526-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfde/6583298/3ebe21b3a6bf/jamanetwopen-2-e190526-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfde/6583298/d519327197fb/jamanetwopen-2-e190526-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfde/6583298/5ef715236242/jamanetwopen-2-e190526-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfde/6583298/3ebe21b3a6bf/jamanetwopen-2-e190526-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfde/6583298/d519327197fb/jamanetwopen-2-e190526-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends, Regional Variations, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Cesarean Births in India, 2010-2016.2010-2016 年印度剖宫产趋势、地域差异和社会经济差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190526. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0526.
2
Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.评估 2005 年至 2016 年期间印度公立和私立医疗机构之间剖宫产率的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2015022. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15022.
3
Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality.剖宫产率与母婴死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
4
High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.私营部门医疗机构剖宫产率较高——印度第四次地区层面家庭调查(DLHS-4)分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 10;18(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5533-3.
5
Cesarean delivery and associated socioeconomic factors and neonatal survival outcome in Kenya and Tanzania: analysis of national survey data.肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚的剖宫产分娩及其相关社会经济因素与新生儿生存结局:国家调查数据分析。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1748403. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1748403.
6
Stillbirth among women in nine states in India: rate and risk factors in study of 886,505 women from the annual health survey.印度九个邦女性的死产情况:对年度健康调查中886,505名女性的研究中的发生率及风险因素
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e022583. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022583.
7
Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011.印度选择性堕胎女孩的趋势:1990 年至 2005 年全国出生史和 1991 年至 2011 年人口普查数据的分析。
Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1921-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60649-1. Epub 2011 May 25.
8
Spatial and temporal trends of cesarean deliveries in Uganda: 2012-2016.乌干达剖宫产术的时空趋势:2012-2016 年。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2279-6.
9
Out of pocket expenditure and distress financing on cesarean delivery in India: evidence from NFHS-5.印度剖宫产的自费支出和困境融资:来自 NFHS-5 的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09980-w.
10
Alarming Trends of Cesarean Section-Time to Rethink: Evidence From a Large-Scale Cross-sectional Sample Survey in India.令人担忧的剖宫产时间趋势:来自印度大规模横断面抽样调查的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 13;25:e41892. doi: 10.2196/41892.

引用本文的文献

1
Overlapping social structures behind Brazil's cesarean section births: A decomposition analysis.巴西剖宫产分娩背后重叠的社会结构:一项分解分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325251. eCollection 2025.
2
Inequality in Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Literature.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健服务利用的不平等:文献综述
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9.
3
Preventing the preventable: Assessing the burden of incessant caesarean deliveries in select Indian states using NFHS-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.减少健康妇女和婴儿不必要剖宫产的干预措施。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
2
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
3
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
预防可预防之事:利用第五轮全国家庭健康调查评估印度部分邦持续剖宫产的负担。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 23;20(4):e0320041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320041. eCollection 2025.
4
State-wise variation and inequalities in caesarean delivery rates in India: analysis of the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-2021) data.印度剖宫产率的邦级差异与不平等:基于第五次全国家庭健康调查(2019 - 2021年)数据的分析
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024 Dec 3;32:100512. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100512. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Trends and determinants of caesarean section in South Asian countries: Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan.南亚国家(孟加拉国、尼泊尔和巴基斯坦)剖宫产的趋势及决定因素
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0311082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311082. eCollection 2024.
6
A tale of two exemplars: the maternal and newborn mortality transitions of two state clusters in India.两个典范的故事:印度两个邦的孕产妇和新生儿死亡率转变。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 6;9(Suppl 2):e011413. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011413.
7
Making the health system work for over 25 million births annually: drivers of the notable decline in maternal and newborn mortality in India.使卫生系统每年为 2500 多万例分娩服务:印度孕产妇和新生儿死亡率显著下降的驱动因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 6;9(Suppl 2):e011411. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011411.
8
Disparities in Elective and Emergency Caesarean Section Rates Among Public and Private Hospitals in the Districts of Andhra Pradesh, India.印度安得拉邦各地区公立和私立医院择期及急诊剖宫产率的差异
Cureus. 2024 Feb 16;16(2):e54320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54320. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Feasibility and acceptability of the Indian Autism Screening Questionnaire in clinical and community settings.印度自闭症筛查问卷在临床和社区环境中的可行性和可接受性。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0292544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292544. eCollection 2023.
10
Commentary: Developing technical support and strategic dialogue at the country level to achieve primary health care-based health systems beyond the COVID-19 era.评论:在国家层面发展技术支持和战略对话,以在新冠疫情时代之后建立基于初级卫生保健的卫生系统。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 25;11:1212271. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1212271. eCollection 2023.
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
4
Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.2012年至2016年中国独生子女政策放宽与剖宫产率及出生结局的趋势:对近700万例医疗机构分娩的观察性研究
BMJ. 2018 Mar 5;360:k817. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k817.
5
Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries.剖宫产率的国内不平等现象:对72个低收入和中等收入国家的观察性研究
BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:k55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k55.
6
Improving Access to Institutional Delivery through Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram: Evidence from Rural Haryana, North India.通过“母婴安全行动”改善机构分娩服务可及性:来自印度北部哈里亚纳邦农村地区的证据
Indian J Community Med. 2017 Apr-Jun;42(2):73-76. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.205223.
7
Geographic Variations and Temporal Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2014.中国 2008-2014 年剖宫产率的地域差异和时间趋势。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 3;317(1):69-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18663.
8
Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.使用罗布森十组分类法检查剖宫产率
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
9
A review of national health surveys in India.印度全国健康调查综述。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Apr 1;94(4):286-96A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.158493. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.