Suppr超能文献

主观体验的物理本质及其与大脑的相互作用。

The physical nature of subjective experience and its interaction with the brain.

机构信息

Developmental Biopsychiatry Research Program, McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Hypotheses. 2019 Apr;125:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Abstract

Penrose and Hameroff assert that brain computations, including quantum computations, involving hydrophobic areas of microtubules whose electron clouds go into orchestrated superpositions and reductions that lead to proto-conscious elements, or "bings" that become orchestrated into conscious experiences. Their assertion, however, like the findings of the neural correlates of consciousness, does not explain subjectivity, but rather describes necessary conditions for it. Many scientists, including Panksepp, Demasio, and Tononi, have each made great contributions to the field, but none explains how material biological processes acquire subjectivity. Yet, the fact is that subjectivity exists and is and of great importance to evolution. Penrose argues that understanding, which involves subjectivity, must be brought into physics, perhaps an undiscovered aspect. Subjectivity is always of or about certain living brain information even though most brain functions do not have subjectivity. Many quantum fields are known to exist and follow Dyson's definition: "a kind of tension or stress which can exist in empty space in the absence of matter. It reveals itself by producing forces, which act on any material objects that happen to lie in the space the field occupies." My hypothesis is that there may be undiscovered quantum fields, which unlike known fields, induce subjectivity when they interact with certain brain information. They emit quantum particles that exert force and cause changes to material objects (brain patterns conveying information) with which they interact. Information that transports meaning to living material exerts force through the understanding it conveys. There is a continuous interplay between experience and brain information. Experiences profoundly inform the brain and alter brain structure, function, and behavior, and local and integrated brain functions process information and initiate multiple associated experiences. Most experience is non-conscious, as discussed by Wright and others, like the soundtrack of a movie to which our brains respond continuously and emotionally even though, we are only intermittently consciously aware of it. I will explore how non-conscious experience may relate to the self, and how it might become conscious. I will offer present support and directions for testing this plausible hypothesis, as well as potential clinical applications in psychology.

摘要

彭罗斯和哈梅罗夫断言,大脑计算包括涉及微管疏水区的量子计算,其中电子云进入协调的叠加和减少,导致原意识元素或“bings”,这些元素被协调成有意识的体验。然而,他们的断言,就像意识的神经相关物的发现一样,并没有解释主观性,而是描述了它的必要条件。许多科学家,包括潘克塞普、德马西奥和托诺尼,都对该领域做出了巨大贡献,但没有一个人解释物质生物过程如何获得主观性。然而,事实是主观性存在,并且对进化具有重要意义。彭罗斯认为,理解涉及主观性,必须引入物理学中,也许是一个未被发现的方面。主观性总是与某些生命大脑信息有关,即使大多数大脑功能没有主观性。许多量子场已知存在,并遵循戴森的定义:“一种在没有物质的情况下存在于真空中的张力或压力。它通过产生力来揭示自身,这些力作用于碰巧位于该场占据的空间中的任何物质物体上。”我的假设是,可能存在未被发现的量子场,它们与已知的场不同,当它们与某些大脑信息相互作用时,会引起主观性。它们发出量子粒子,对与之相互作用的物质物体(传递信息的大脑模式)施加力并引起变化。传输有意义的信息的生命物质通过所传达的理解来施加力。经验和大脑信息之间存在着持续的相互作用。经验深刻地影响大脑并改变大脑结构、功能和行为,局部和整合的大脑功能处理信息并引发多个相关的经验。正如赖特和其他人所讨论的那样,大多数经验是非意识的,就像电影的配乐一样,我们的大脑会持续地、情绪化地对其做出反应,尽管我们只是间歇性地有意识地意识到它。我将探讨非意识经验如何与自我相关,以及它如何变得有意识。我将提供当前支持和测试这个合理假设的方向,以及心理学中的潜在临床应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验