• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两阶段设计中反应概率的精确置信限。

Exact confidence limits for the probability of response in two-stage designs.

作者信息

Shan Guogen

机构信息

Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154.

出版信息

Statistics (Ber). 2018;52(5):1086-1095. doi: 10.1080/02331888.2018.1469023. Epub 2018 May 8.

DOI:10.1080/02331888.2018.1469023
PMID:30906095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6426334/
Abstract

In addition to point estimate for the probability of response in a two-stage design (e.g., Simon's two-stage design for a Phase II clinical trial with binary endpoints), confidence limits should be Cute the confidence interval does not guarantee coverage probability in a two-stage setting. The existing exact approach to calculate one-sided limits is based on the overall number of responses to order the sample space. This approach could be conservative because many sample points have the same limits. We propose a new exact one-sided interval based on p-value for the sample space ordering. Exact intervals are computed by using binomial distributions directly, instead of a normal approximation. Both exact intervals preserve the nominal confidence level. The proposed exact interval based on the p-value generally performs better than the other exact interval with regard to expected length and simple average length of confidence intervals. Therefore, the new interval calculation based on p-value is recommended for use in practice.

摘要

除了两阶段设计中反应概率的点估计(例如,针对具有二元终点的II期临床试验的西蒙两阶段设计)外,还应计算置信限,因为在两阶段设置中,置信区间并不能保证覆盖概率。现有的计算单侧限的精确方法是基于反应的总数来对样本空间进行排序。这种方法可能是保守的,因为许多样本点具有相同的限值。我们提出了一种基于p值对样本空间进行排序的新的精确单侧区间。精确区间通过直接使用二项分布来计算,而不是使用正态近似。两种精确区间都保持了名义置信水平。就置信区间的期望长度和简单平均长度而言,所提出的基于p值的精确区间通常比其他精确区间表现更好。因此,建议在实际应用中使用基于p值的新区间计算方法。

相似文献

1
Exact confidence limits for the probability of response in two-stage designs.两阶段设计中反应概率的精确置信限。
Statistics (Ber). 2018;52(5):1086-1095. doi: 10.1080/02331888.2018.1469023. Epub 2018 May 8.
2
Exact confidence limits for the response rate in two-stage designs with over- or under-enrollment in the second stage.两阶段设计中第二阶段过度或不足招募时的反应率的确切置信限。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Apr;27(4):1045-1055. doi: 10.1177/0962280216650918. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
Efficient confidence limits for adaptive one-arm two-stage clinical trials with binary endpoints.具有二元终点的适应性单臂两阶段临床试验的有效置信限
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0297-5.
4
Exact p-values for Simon's two-stage designs in clinical trials.临床试验中西蒙两阶段设计的确切p值。
Stat Biosci. 2016;8(2):351-357. doi: 10.1007/s12561-016-9152-1. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Statistical inference for extended or shortened phase II studies based on Simon's two-stage designs.基于西蒙两阶段设计的扩展或缩短的II期研究的统计推断。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jun 7;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0039-5.
6
Exact one-sided confidence limits for Cohen's kappa as a measurement of agreement.作为一致性度量的科恩kappa系数的精确单侧置信限。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):615-632. doi: 10.1177/0962280214552881. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
7
Modified Simon's minimax and optimal two-stage designs for single-arm phase II cancer clinical trials.用于单臂II期癌症临床试验的改良西蒙极小极大设计和最优两阶段设计。
Oncotarget. 2019 Jul 2;10(42):4255-4261. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26981.
8
Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.基于某些加权函数的两个二项式比例差的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2014 Jun 15;33(13):2288-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.6147. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
9
Two-stage optimal designs with survival endpoint when the follow-up time is restricted.具有生存终点且随访时间受限的两阶段最优设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 3;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0696-x.
10
Interval estimation of binomial proportion in clinical trials with a two-stage design.两阶段设计的临床试验中二元比例的区间估计。
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 15;27(1):15-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.2930.

引用本文的文献

1
Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Trial Designs I: A Methodological Review.适应性试验设计的置信区间I:方法学综述
Stat Med. 2025 Aug;44(18-19):e70174. doi: 10.1002/sim.70174.
2
Response to the letter by Guogen Shan, Hua Zhang, and Tao Jiang.对单国根、张华和江涛来信的回复。
Stat Med. 2020 Sep 30;39(22):3024-3025. doi: 10.1002/sim.8583.
3
Accurate confidence intervals for risk difference in meta-analysis with rare events.荟萃分析中罕见事件风险差的精确置信区间。

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal inference for Simon's two-stage design with over or under enrollment at the second stage.关于第二阶段存在超额或不足入组情况的西蒙两阶段设计的最优推断。
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2018;47(4):1157-1167. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2017.1307398. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Minimax and admissible adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials.最小化极大和可接受的适应性两阶段设计在 II 期临床试验中。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 2;16:90. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0194-3.
3
Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for early phase II clinical trials.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Apr 30;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00954-8.
4
Correlation Coefficients for a Study with Repeated Measures.具有重复测量的研究的相关系数。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2020 Mar 26;2020:7398324. doi: 10.1155/2020/7398324. eCollection 2020.
5
Two-stage optimal designs with survival endpoint when the follow-up time is restricted.具有生存终点且随访时间受限的两阶段最优设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 3;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0696-x.
早期II期临床试验的最优适应性两阶段设计。
Stat Med. 2016 Apr 15;35(8):1257-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.6794. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
4
Exact confidence intervals for the relative risk and the odds ratio.相对风险和比值比的精确置信区间。
Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):985-95. doi: 10.1111/biom.12360. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
5
Hypothesis testing for two-stage designs with over or under enrollment.针对入组人数过多或过少的两阶段设计进行假设检验。
Stat Med. 2015 Jul 20;34(16):2417-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.6490. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
6
Statistical issues for design and analysis of single-arm multi-stage phase II cancer clinical trials.单臂多阶段II期癌症临床试验设计与分析的统计学问题
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 May;42:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
7
Randomized two-stage Phase II clinical trial designs based on Barnard's exact test.基于巴纳德精确检验的随机两阶段II期临床试验设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2013;23(5):1081-90. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.813525.
8
Unconditional tests for comparing two ordered multinomials.用于比较两个有序多项分布的无条件检验。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Feb;25(1):241-54. doi: 10.1177/0962280212450957. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
9
An exact method for analysis following a two-stage phase II cancer clinical trial.一种用于分析两阶段 II 期癌症临床试验的精确方法。
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 30;29(30):3118-25. doi: 10.1002/sim.3837.
10
Two-stage designs optimal under the alternative hypothesis for phase II cancer clinical trials.两阶段设计在 II 期癌症临床试验替代假设下的最优性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):572-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Aug 1.