Schwab F J, Glick S N, Teplick S K, Adler L P
Radiology. 1986 Sep;160(3):619-22. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.3.3090614.
The authors prospectively evaluated 1,001 consecutive double-contrast barium enema examinations to determine the efficacy of the preliminary film. The scout films were evaluated for the presence of unsatisfactory amounts of residual feces and clinically significant extracolonic abnormalities. The contrast studies were independently evaluated in a double-blind manner for satisfactory colonic preparation as well as extracolonic abnormalities. The routine use of the scout film resulted in an increase in health care charges and departmental costs. In addition, there was no significant increase in the detection of extracolonic abnormalities. Our data suggest that routine use of scout films prior to contrast studies is unnecessary, although selective use in some clinical situations may be justified.
作者前瞻性地评估了连续1001例双重对比钡灌肠检查,以确定初步拍片的效果。对定位片进行评估,看是否存在残留粪便量不理想以及临床上显著的结肠外异常情况。以双盲方式独立评估对比研究,看结肠准备是否令人满意以及是否存在结肠外异常。常规使用定位片导致医疗费用和科室成本增加。此外,结肠外异常的检出率没有显著提高。我们的数据表明,在对比研究之前常规使用定位片是不必要的,尽管在某些临床情况下选择性使用可能是合理的。